Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Rectal Cancer Patients from the Iowa Cancer Registry: Role of Hospital Volume and Tumor Location

[1]  D. Wasowicz,et al.  Hospital variation in sphincter-preservation rates in rectal cancer treatment: results of a population-based study in the Netherlands , 2021, BJS open.

[2]  Bin Huang,et al.  Neoadjuvant Therapy in Stage II/III Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study in a Disparate Population and the Effect on Survival , 2021, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[3]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Patient and Caregiver Considerations and Priorities When Selecting Hospitals for Complex Cancer Care , 2021, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[4]  K. Bilimoria,et al.  National Evaluation of Patient Preferences in Selecting Hospitals and Health Care Providers , 2020, Medical care.

[5]  M. Huguet.  Centralization of care in high volume hospitals and inequalities in access to care. , 2020, Social science & medicine.

[6]  M. Ward,et al.  Hospital and Surgeon Selection for Medicare Beneficiaries With Stage II/III Rectal Cancer , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[7]  C. Lynch,et al.  Guideline-Recommended Chemoradiation for Patients With Rectal Cancer at Large Hospitals: A Trend in the Right Direction. , 2019, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.

[8]  J. Dimick,et al.  Centralization of High-Risk Cancer Surgery Within Existing Hospital Systems. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  D. Winchester,et al.  Compliance with Cancer Quality Measures Over Time and Their Association with Survival Outcomes: The Commission on Cancer’s Experience with the Quality Measure Requiring at Least 12 Regional Lymph Nodes to be Removed and Analyzed with Colon Cancer Resections , 2019, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  L. Wyrwicz,et al.  Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  M. Patti,et al.  Challenges of centralizing cancer care in the US. , 2018, International journal of surgery.

[12]  J. Monson,et al.  Accreditation Readiness in US Multidisciplinary Rectal Cancer Care: A Survey of OSTRICH Member Institutions , 2017, JAMA surgery.

[13]  Justin T. Brady,et al.  Evaluating the Current Status of Rectal Cancer Care in the US: Where We Stand at the Start of the Commission on Cancer's National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[14]  L. Temple,et al.  Is the Distance Worth It? Patients With Rectal Cancer Traveling to High-Volume Centers Experience Improved Outcomes , 2017, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[15]  S. Wexner,et al.  The Rationale for and Reality of the New National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer , 2017, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[16]  M. Kornmann,et al.  Minimum Volume Discussion in the Treatment of Colon and Rectal Cancer: A Review of the Current Status and Relevance of Surgeon and Hospital Volume regarding Result Quality and the Impact on Health Economics , 2017, Visceral Medicine.

[17]  K. Phan,et al.  Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery. , 2017, Journal of gastrointestinal oncology.

[18]  C. Booth,et al.  Lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in routine clinical practice: a population-based study. , 2017, Current oncology.

[19]  A. Benson,et al.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer Affects Lymph Node Yield and Status Without Clear Implications on Outcome: The Case for Eliminating a Metric and Using Preoperative Staging to Guide Therapy. , 2016, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[20]  J. Monson,et al.  High volume improves outcomes: The argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery. , 2016, Surgery.

[21]  Chi Lin,et al.  Hospital Characteristics Associated with Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Guideline Concordant Care: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Data , 2016, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[22]  J. Fleshman,et al.  Failure of Evidence-Based Cancer Care in the United States: The Association Between Rectal Cancer Treatment, Cancer Center Volume, and Geography , 2014, Annals of surgery.

[23]  A. Laenen,et al.  Effect of hospital volume on quality of care and outcome after rectal cancer surgery , 2014, The British journal of surgery.

[24]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Black patients more likely than whites to undergo surgery at low-quality hospitals in segregated regions. , 2013, Health affairs.

[25]  K. Smedh,et al.  Centralization of rectal cancer surgery improves long‐term survival , 2010, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[26]  B. Egleston,et al.  Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  R. Sandler,et al.  The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgery. , 2008, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[28]  J. Meyerhardt,et al.  Impact of hospital procedure volume on surgical operation and long-term outcomes in high-risk curatively resected rectal cancer: findings from the Intergroup 0114 Study. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  A. Zaslavsky,et al.  Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.