Impact of Advocacy, Communication, Social Mobilization and Active Case Finding on TB Notification in Jharkhand, India

Community-level benefits of screening for active tuberculosis (TB) disease remain uncertain. Project Axshya (meaning free of TB) conducted advocacy, communication, social mobilization, and active case finding among vulnerable/marginalized populations of India. Among 15 districts of Jharkhand state, the project was initiated in 36 subdistrict level administrative units – tuberculosis units (TUs) in a staggered manner between April 2013 and September 2014, and continued till the end of 2015. Seven TUs did not implement the project. We assessed the relative change in the quarterly TB case finding indicators (n = 4) after inclusion of a TU within the project. By fitting four multilevel models (mixed-effects maximum likelihood regression using random intercept), we adjusted for secular (over previous five quarters) and seasonal trends, baseline differences within Axshya and non-Axshya TUs, and population size and clustering within districts and within TUs. After inclusion of a TU within the project, we found a significant increase [95% confidence interval (CI)] in TU-level presumptive TB sputum examination rate, new sputum-positive TB Case Notification Rate (CNR), sputum-positive TB CNR, and all forms TB CNR by 12 (5.5, 18.5), 1.1 (0.5, 1.7), 1.3 (0.6, 2.0), and 1.2 (0.1, 2.2) per 100,000 population per quarter, respectively. Overall, the project resulted in an increase (95% CI) in sputum examination and detection of new sputum-positive TB, sputum-positive TB and all forms of TB patients by 22,410 (10,203, 34,077), 2066 (923, 3210), 2380 (1162, 3616), and 2122 (203, 4059), respectively. This provides evidence for implementing project Axshya over and above the existing passive case finding.

[1]  M. S. Lohar,et al.  Patient characteristics, health seeking and delays among new sputum smear positive TB patients identified through active case finding when compared to passive case finding in India , 2019, PloS one.

[2]  M. S. Lohar,et al.  Active case finding among marginalised and vulnerable populations reduces catastrophic costs due to tuberculosis diagnosis , 2018, Global health action.

[3]  S. Saw,et al.  The contribution of a non-governmental organisation’s Community Based Tuberculosis Care Programme to case finding in Myanmar: trend over time , 2017, Infectious Diseases of Poverty.

[4]  N. Arinaminpathy,et al.  Counting the lives saved by DOTS in India: a model-based approach , 2017, BMC Medicine.

[5]  S. Chadha,et al.  Status of Tuberculosis services in Indian Prisons. , 2017, International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases.

[6]  A. Mkopi,et al.  Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community‐level services , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  A. Trébucq,et al.  Do active case-finding projects increase the number of tuberculosis cases notified at national level? , 2017, The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[8]  S. Swaminathan,et al.  The Tuberculosis Cascade of Care in India’s Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[9]  S. Satyanarayana,et al.  Experience of active tuberculosis case finding in nearly 5 million households in India. , 2016, Public health action.

[10]  N. Nishikiori,et al.  Increased Case Notification through Active Case Finding of Tuberculosis among Household and Neighbourhood Contacts in Cambodia , 2016, PloS one.

[11]  S. Chadha,et al.  High and equitable tuberculosis awareness coverage in the community-driven Axshya TB control project in India. , 2015, Public Health Action.

[12]  R. Hayes,et al.  Effect of household and community interventions on the burden of tuberculosis in southern Africa: the ZAMSTAR community-randomised trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[13]  M. Uplekar,et al.  Programmatic approaches to screening for active tuberculosis. , 2013, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[14]  J. Golub,et al.  The benefits to communities and individuals of screening for active tuberculosis disease: a systematic review. , 2013, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[15]  T. Yoshiyama,et al.  Epidemiological impact of mass tuberculosis screening: a 2-year follow-up after a national prevalence survey. , 2012, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[16]  P. Dewan,et al.  New Vision for Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP): Universal access - “Reaching the un-reached” , 2012, The Indian journal of medical research.

[17]  A. Muruganathan,et al.  Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP). , 2010, Journal of the Indian Medical Association.

[18]  R. Hayes,et al.  Comparison of two active case-finding strategies for community-based diagnosis of symptomatic smear-positive tuberculosis and control of infectious tuberculosis in Harare, Zimbabwe (DETECTB): a cluster-randomised trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[19]  N. Horton Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata , 2006 .

[20]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.