Prevention and Control of Actinobacillus (Haemophilus) pleuropneumoniae Infection in Swine: A review.

Transmission of Actinobacillus pleuropneumonlae The bacterium, Actinobacillus (Haemophilus) pleuroIpneumoniae, is the causative agent of pleuropneumonia of swine (1,2). Mortality may vary but is usually high in acute outbreaks of pleuropneumonia. Survivors of acute infection often develop chronic lung lesions (sequestra, abscesses, and pleuritic adhesions) and become carriers (2). Chronically infected animals have reduced feed conversion, higher medication costs, lower weaning rates, and reduced market value. In total, it is estimated that losses due to pleuropneumonia are over 40 million dollars a year in Canada. Due to this great economic impact, prevention and control programs for pleuropneumonia should receive high priority (3). Since A. pleuropneumoniae does not persist in the environment, and only pigs are known to be susceptible to infection under natural conditions, elimination of this organism should be feasible (2). Pleuropneumonia is spread between herds by carriers. Infected pigs may carry the bacterium in the nose, tonsils, or sequestered in the lungs without demonstrating any clinical signs (4). Following the introduction of the pathogen into herds not previously exposed, morbidity and mortality may occur in all age groups. Losses are usually highest in feeder pigs, probably as the result of the stress related to rapid growth and their naive immune status. Moving and mixing pigs increases the risk of pleuropneumonia. The probability of introducing A. pleuropneumoniae into a herd increases with frequency of purchase and with the number of animals purchased at a time (5). If pigs are purchased from sales barns, the risk is significantly higher than if they are purchased directly from one breeder. Closed herds have the lowest incidence. Measures such as quarantining new stock, pest control programs, banning visitors, and purchasing health-examined stock can be correlated with reduced risk (5). Once a herd is infected, several stress factors influence the likelihood of an outbreak of the disease. Crowding, sudden climatic changes, ventilator breakdown, and intercurrent disease can all be associated with onset of clinical pleuropneumonia (2). In infected herds, measures should be taken to create optimal environmental conditions for the animals. Particular attention should be given to providing pigs with adequate space and proper ventilation and to limiting mixing of animals.

[1]  J. MacInnes,et al.  Analysis of major antigens of Haemophilus (Actinobacillus) pleuropneumoniae and related organisms , 1987, Infection and immunity.

[2]  O. P. Miniats,et al.  Protective efficacy of capsule extracts of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae in pigs and mice. , 1986, Veterinary microbiology.

[3]  S. Martin,et al.  Prevalence of respiratory diseases and their association with growth rate and space in randomly selected swine herds. , 1986, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[4]  中井 豊次,et al.  Bacteriological, serological, and pathological examinations of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae infection in 200 slaughtered pigs. , 1986 .

[5]  R. Nielsen Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae (Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae). Serotypes 8, 3 and 6. Serological response and cross immunity in pigs. , 1985, Nordisk veterinaermedicin.

[6]  K. Mittal,et al.  Serological cross-reactivity between a porcine Actinobacillus strain and Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. , 1985, Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee.

[7]  H. M. Schey,et al.  Comparison of tissue reactions produced by Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae vaccines made with six different adjuvants in swine. , 1985, Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee.

[8]  P. Willson,et al.  Comparison of common antibiotic therapies for haemophilus pleuropneumonia in pigs. , 1985, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[9]  R. Nielsen Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae serotypes--cross protection experiments. , 1984, Nordisk veterinaermedicin.

[10]  S. Larivière,et al.  A 2-mercaptoethanol tube agglutination test for diagnosis of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae infection in pigs. , 1984, American journal of veterinary research.

[11]  J R Saunders,et al.  Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae infection in swine: a review. , 1983, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[12]  W. R. Mitchell,et al.  Epidemiology of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae infection in pigs: a survey of Ontario Pork Producers, 1981. , 1983, Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee.

[13]  M. Libal,et al.  Plasmid-mediated antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. , 1982, American journal of veterinary research.

[14]  J. Nicolet,et al.  An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, using an EDTA-extracted antigen for the serology of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. , 1981, American journal of veterinary research.

[15]  M. R. Wilson,et al.  Vaccination against pleuropneumonia of pigs caused by Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. , 1981, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[16]  A. Gunnarsson Evaluation of different antigens in the complement-fixation test for diagnosis of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae (parahaemolyticus) infections in swine. , 1979, American journal of veterinary research.

[17]  R. Nielsen Pleuropneumonia of swine caused by Haemophilus parahaemolyticus. Studies on the protection obtained by vaccination. , 1976, Nordisk veterinaermedicin.