Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials

Summary Social and psychological interventions are often complex. Understanding randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of these complex interventions requires a detailed description of the interventions tested and the methods used to evaluate them. However, RCT reports often omit, or inadequately report, this information. Incomplete and inaccurate reporting hinders the optimal use of research, wastes resources and fails to meet ethical obligations to research participants and consumers. In this paper, we explain how reporting guidelines have improved the quality of reports in medicine, and describe the ongoing development of a new reporting guideline for RCTs: CONSORT-SPI (an extension for social and psychological interventions). We invite readers to participate in the project by visiting our website, in order to help us reach the best-informed consensus on these guidelines (http://tinyurl.com/CONSORT-study).

[1]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  Reporting Quality of Social and Psychological Intervention Trials: A Systematic Review of Reporting Guidelines and Trial Publications , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  Kirsty James,et al.  Cognitive analytic therapy for personality disorder: randomised controlled trial , 2013, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[3]  David Moher,et al.  Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  David Moher,et al.  PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity , 2012, PLoS medicine.

[5]  D. Moher,et al.  Reporting quality of life in clinical trials: a CONSORT extension , 2011, The Lancet.

[6]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  G. Moore,et al.  Public health evaluation: which designs work, for whom and under what circumstances? , 2011, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[8]  J. K. Manuel,et al.  Improving the quality of reporting alcohol outcome studies: effects of the CONSORT statement. , 2010, Addictive behaviors.

[9]  Catherine Hewitt,et al.  Are criminologists describing randomized controlled trials in ways that allow us to assess them? Findings from a sample of crime and justice trials , 2010 .

[10]  D. Moher,et al.  Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[11]  Matthias J. Naleppa,et al.  Treatment Fidelity in Social Work Intervention Research: A Review of Published Studies , 2010 .

[12]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Can We Systematically Review Studies That Evaluate Complex Interventions? , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[13]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Alternatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public health interventions: design challenges and solutions , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[14]  Apa Publications,et al.  Reporting standards for research in psychology: why do we need them? What might they be? , 2008, The American psychologist.

[15]  D. Moher,et al.  Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  Carl Heneghan,et al.  What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  David Moher,et al.  Methods and processes of the CONSORT Group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[19]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Evan Mayo-Wilson,et al.  Reporting implementation in randomized trials: proposed additions to the consolidated standards of reporting trials statement. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[21]  Judith L. Green,et al.  Standards for Reporting on Empirical Social Science Research in AERA Publications , 2006 .

[22]  Diana Elbourne,et al.  Improving the Usability of Educational Research: Guidelines for the REPOrting of Primary Empirical Research Studies in Education (The REPOSE Guidelines) , 2004 .

[23]  Alan Shiell,et al.  Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be? , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  D. Altman,et al.  CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Don C Des Jarlais,et al.  Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[26]  Iain Chalmers,et al.  Trying to do more Good than Harm in Policy and Practice: The Role of Rigorous, Transparent, Up-to-Date Evaluations , 2003 .

[27]  J. Stinson,et al.  Clinical trials in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology: applying the CONSORT statement. , 2003, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[28]  C. Bonell.  The utility of randomized controlled trials of social interventions: An examination of two trials of HIV prevention , 2002 .

[29]  Stephen Scott.  Serious Emotional Disturbance in Children and Adolescents: Multisystemic Therapy. , 2002, Child and adolescent mental health.

[30]  D. D. Des Jarlais,et al.  A Profile of U.S.‐Based Trials of Behavioral and Social Interventions for HIV Risk Reduction , 2002, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[31]  Kenneth F Schulz,et al.  Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering , 2002, The Lancet.

[32]  C. Adams,et al.  Unpublished rating scales: A major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophrenia , 2000, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[33]  D. Cook,et al.  Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? , 1998, The Lancet.

[34]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. , 2012, International journal of surgery.

[35]  Matt Sutton,et al.  Using Natural Experiments to Evaluate Population Health Interventions: Guidance for Producers and Users of Evidence , 2011 .

[36]  D. Moher,et al.  Correspondence2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010 .

[37]  T. Wachs,et al.  CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts , 2008 .

[38]  L. Kinch,et al.  trafficking complexes conserved in eukaryotic evolution Longin-like folds identified in CHiPS and DUF 254 proteins : Vesicle , 2006 .

[39]  A FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF RCTs FOR COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS TO IMPROVE HEALTH , 2000 .

[40]  R. Prescott,et al.  Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. , 1999, Health technology assessment.