Teacher Support of Student Autonomy in Comprehensive School Reform Classrooms

Background/Context: Research in the self-determination theoretical (SDT) tradition indicates that teachers’ autonomy-supportive behaviors result in students’ greater perceived academic competence, better academic performance, and increased achievement. This study describes autonomy-supportive teacher behaviors in schools participating in Comprehensive School Reform (CSR). Research Question: In a 2006 pilot study to determine if autonomous opportunities occurred in CSR classroom contexts, Bozack, McCaslin, and Good identified the presence or absence of autonomy-supporting teaching in their written narratives of classroom practices. The current study moves that pilot research forward by asking, Are autonomy-supportive teaching practices present? And if so, what is the nature of the teacher-student interactions in these classrooms? Population: The sample consisted of 696 intervals of field notes from 106 classroom observations in five CSR schools in Grades 3, 4, and 5. Research Design: Comprehensive School Reform Classroom Observation System (CSRCOS) observation field notes were analyzed using the Autonomy Supportive Behavior Instrument (ASBI). The scale was developed based on previous SDT research suggestions about how teachers can foster autonomy in the classroom. Conclusions: Results indicated that all eight teaching practices suggested by SDT were present in our field notes; however, their frequency and form varied considerably from SDT expectations. Students had many opportunities to manipulate objects, but in half of the

[1]  Zur Shapira,et al.  Expectancy determinants of intrinsically motivated behavior. , 1976 .

[2]  R. D. Charms,et al.  Enhancing Motivation: Change in the Classroom , 1977 .

[3]  C. Midgley,et al.  Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. , 1989, Child development.

[4]  A. Assor,et al.  Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. , 2002, The British journal of educational psychology.

[5]  T. Good,et al.  Comprehensive School Reform Instructional Practices Throughout a School Year: The Role of Subject Matter, Grade Level, and Time of Year , 2008, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[6]  Jizhi Zhang,et al.  How Well Do 1st-Year Teachers Teach , 2006 .

[7]  Shawn Van Etten,et al.  Big theories revisited , 2004 .

[8]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  Predicting Students’ Outcomes from Their Perceptions of Classroom Psychosocial Environment , 1982 .

[9]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[10]  E. Deci,et al.  Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective , 2008 .

[11]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  An Instrument to Assess Adults' Orientations toward Control versus Autonomy with Children: Reflections on Intrinsic Motivation and Perceived Competence. , 1981 .

[12]  B. Rogoff.  Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners , 2009 .

[13]  C. Midgley,et al.  Teacher Discourse and Sixth Graders' Reported Affect and Achievement Behaviors in Two High-Mastery/High-Performance Mathematics Classrooms , 2003, The Elementary School Journal.

[14]  S. Nichols,et al.  Comprehensive School Reform: An Observational Study of Teaching in Grades 3 through 5 , 2006, The Elementary School Journal.

[15]  J. Reeve,et al.  What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. , 2006 .

[16]  R. Decharms.  Personal causation : the internal affective determinants of behavior , 1968 .

[17]  Stanley Pogrow.  HOTS Revisited: A Thinking Development Approach to Reducing the Learning Gap after Grade 3 , 2005 .

[18]  E. Deci,et al.  The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective , 2000 .

[19]  E. Deci,et al.  A motivational approach to self: integration in personality. , 1990, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[20]  J. Reeve,et al.  Autonomy-Supportive Teachers: How They Teach and Motivate Students , 1999 .

[21]  E. Deci,et al.  The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Y. Eshel,et al.  The Informal Curriculum , 2001 .

[23]  Kathleen C. Perencevich,et al.  Supporting Autonomy in the Classroom: Ways Teachers Encourage Student Decision Making and Ownership , 2004 .

[24]  M. Barrett,et al.  Use of techniques promoting students' self-determination: Effects on students' analytic problem-solving skills , 1993 .

[25]  Barbara L. McCombs,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: A Phenomenological View , 1989 .

[26]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theoretical perspectives , 2001 .

[27]  Mary M. Mccaslin.  Co-Regulation of Student Motivation and Emergent Identity , 2009 .