Experiencing other people's houses: a model of similarities and differences in environmental experience

Abstract This paper presents a model for the process underlying similarities and differences in environmental experience. According to the model, repeated exposure to regularities in the environment influences the development of internal knowledge structures. Discrepancies from the knowledge structures influence emotional appraisals. In Experiment 1, using measure of goodness of example and familiarity for knowledge structures, and measures of preferences and interest for emotional appraisals, we had first year architecture and students from other disciplines judge a set of single family houses-half of ‘high’ style, and half of ‘popular’ style. In a second experiment, two groups of the same architecture students at the end of their third year made judgements of goodness of example and preference for the same set of houses. In the first experiment, the two groups displayed similar knowledge structures for the homes, but they differed in the way their emotional appraisals related to discrepancies from the shared knowledge structure. In the second experiment, the goodness of example judgements indicated that little change had occurred in the students' knowledge structures but preference for ‘popular’ style houses had decreased significantly. These results are discussed in terms of the model of the processes that produce similarities and differences in experience.

[1]  A. T. Purcell,et al.  The relationship between buildings and behaviour , 1987 .

[2]  J. Wohlwill Environmental Aesthetics: The Environment as a Source of Affect , 1976 .

[3]  Larry R. Ford,et al.  Architecture and the Geography of the American City , 1983 .

[4]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  A. T. Purcell,et al.  Environmental Perception and Affect , 1986 .

[6]  I. Altman,et al.  Culture and Environment , 1984 .

[7]  D. Rumelhart Schemata and the cognitive system. , 1984 .

[8]  Pawel Lewicki,et al.  Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Nickolaus R. Feimer Environmental perception: The effects of media, evaluative context, and observer sample , 1984 .

[10]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Memory For Experience , 1985 .

[11]  L. Barsalou Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  L. Groat,et al.  Meaning in post-modern architecture: An examination using the multiple sorting task , 1982 .

[13]  G. Mandler Mind and Body: Psychology of Emotion and Stress , 1984 .

[14]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[15]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  Perception, Cognition, and Evaluation of Urban Places , 1989 .

[16]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Human behavior and environment : advances in theory and research , 1976 .

[17]  A. Purcell,et al.  Multivariate Models and the Attributes of the Experience of the Built Environment , 1984 .

[18]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[19]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Aesthetics and Psychobiology , 1975 .

[20]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Play it again, Sam: On Liking Music , 1987 .

[21]  J. D. Wellman,et al.  Landscape architects' interpretations of people's landscape preferences. , 1978 .

[22]  A. T. Purcell,et al.  Abstract and specific physical attributes and the experience of landscape , 1992 .

[23]  A. Purcell The effects of depth of processing, typicality and affect on recognition memory for instances of single detached houses , 1991 .

[24]  Ervin H. Zube,et al.  Landscape perception: Research, application and theory , 1982 .

[25]  J. Mandler Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Schema Theory , 1984 .

[26]  R. Sternberg Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .

[27]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[28]  F. Philip Australia's Home , 1952 .

[29]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[30]  T. Whitfield,et al.  Predicting preference for familiar, everyday objects: An experimental confrontation between two theories of aesthetic behaviour , 1983 .

[31]  A. Purcell,et al.  Landscape Perception, Preference, and Schema Discrepancy , 1987 .

[32]  J. Nasar,et al.  The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of ‘high’ versus ‘popular’ residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same , 1989 .