Additive manufacturing of geopolymer for sustainable built environment

Abstract This paper evaluates the potential of fly ash based geopolymer cement for large scale additive manufacturing (AM) of construction elements. Geopolymer is considered as a green construction material and its use in AM may contribute towards sustainable environment since in AM process material is only deposited whereby it is necessary. As part of this research, an industrial robot was employed to print geopolymer mortar in layer-by-layer manner directly from 3D computer-aided design (CAD) model. The characteristic of raw materials and fresh properties were examined by rheology, x-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Mechanical tests such as compression, flexural and tensile bond strength were conducted on the printed geopolymer in different printing directions and their performance was compared with casted samples. It was found, from the experimental results, that the mechanical properties of 3D printed geopolymer are mostly dependent of loading directions due to anisotropic nature of the printing process and retains intrinsic performance of the material.

[1]  Musaad Zaheer Nazir Khan,et al.  Synthesis of high strength ambient cured geopolymer composite by using low calcium fly ash , 2016 .

[2]  Kyoungsoo Park,et al.  Viscoelastic Properties of Fresh Cement Paste to Study the Flow Behavior , 2016, International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials.

[3]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete – a new processing route for architects and builders , 2016 .

[4]  J. Deventer,et al.  Direct measurement of the kinetics of geopolymerisation by in-situ energy dispersive X-ray diffractometry , 2007 .

[5]  Phillip Frank Gower Banfill,et al.  The rheology of fresh mortar , 1991 .

[6]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry , 2016 .

[7]  Behrokh Khoshnevis,et al.  Cementitious materials for construction-scale 3D printing: Laboratory testing of fresh printing mixture , 2017 .

[8]  Ali Nazari,et al.  Synthesis of geopolymer from industrial wastes , 2015 .

[9]  Paolo Colombo,et al.  Direct ink writing of geopolymeric inks , 2017 .

[10]  N. Roussel,et al.  Properties of fresh and hardened concrete , 2011 .

[11]  T. Erdem,et al.  Thixotropy and structural breakdown properties of self consolidating concrete containing various supplementary cementitious materials , 2015 .

[12]  Dirk Volkmer,et al.  Properties of 3D-printed fiber-reinforced Portland cement paste , 2017 .

[13]  Bernhard Mueller,et al.  Additive Manufacturing Technologies – Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing , 2012 .

[14]  Jon Elvar Wallevik,et al.  Rheological properties of cement paste: Thixotropic behavior and structural breakdown , 2009 .

[15]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Processing and Properties of Construction Materials for 3D Printing , 2016 .

[16]  Nathalie Labonnote,et al.  Additive construction: State-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities , 2016 .

[17]  Ming Jen Tan,et al.  Anisotropic mechanical performance of 3D printed fiber reinforced sustainable construction material , 2017 .

[18]  Behrokh Khoshnevis,et al.  Automated construction by contour craftingrelated robotics and information technologies , 2004 .

[19]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  Whole-body vibration and postural stress among operators of construction equipment: a literature review. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[20]  J. Davidovits Geopolymers : inorganic polymeric new materials , 1991 .

[21]  Brian A. Eick,et al.  Investigation of Concrete Mixtures for Additive Construction , 2017, 3D Concrete Printing Technology.

[22]  Freek Bos,et al.  Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing , 2016, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction.

[23]  Damien Rangeard,et al.  Structural built-up of cement-based materials used for 3D-printing extrusion techniques , 2016 .

[24]  Freek Bos,et al.  3D concrete printing – a structural engineering perspective , 2018 .

[25]  Danijel Rebolj,et al.  Interoperability requirements for automated manufacturing systems in construction , 2016, J. Intell. Manuf..

[26]  Richard A. Buswell,et al.  Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes , 2012 .

[27]  N. Shafiq,et al.  Effects of micro-structure characteristics of interfacial transition zone on the compressive strength of self-compacting geopolymer concrete , 2013 .

[28]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  3D printing and additive manufacturing : principles and applications , 2015 .

[29]  N. Roussel,et al.  An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends , 2011 .

[30]  Kah Fai Leong,et al.  3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review , 2017 .

[31]  Freek Bos,et al.  3D Printing Concrete with Reinforcement , 2017 .

[32]  J. Sanjayan,et al.  Method of formulating geopolymer for 3D printing for construction applications , 2016 .

[33]  Behrokh Khoshnevis,et al.  Mega-scale fabrication by Contour Crafting , 2006 .

[34]  T. T. Le,et al.  Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete , 2012 .

[35]  Jian fei Chen,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Structures 3D-Printed With Cementitious Powders , 2015, 3D Concrete Printing Technology.

[36]  A. Gibb,et al.  Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete , 2012 .