Refined classification and characterization of atmospheric new-particle formation events using air ions

Abstract. Atmospheric new-particle formation (NPF) is a worldwide-observed phenomenon that affects the human health and the global climate. With a growing network of global atmospheric measurement stations, efforts towards investigating NPF have increased. In this study, we present an automated method to classify days into four categories including NPF events, non-events and two classes in between, which then ensures reproducibility and minimizes the hours spent on manual classification. We applied our automated method to 10 years of data collected at the SMEAR II measurement station in Hyytiälä, southern Finland using a Neutral cluster and Air Ion Spectrometer (NAIS). In contrast to the traditionally applied classification methods, which categorize days into events and non-events and ambiguous days as undefined days, our method is able to classify the undefined days as it accesses the initial steps of NPF at sub-3 nm sizes. Our results show that, on ∼24 % of the days in Hyytiälä, a regional NPF event occurred and was characterized by nice weather and favourable conditions such as a clear sky and low condensation sink. Another class found in Hyytiälä is the transported event class, which seems to be NPF carried horizontally or vertically to our measurement location and it occurred on 17 % of the total studied days. Additionally, we found that an ion burst, wherein the ions apparently fail to grow to larger sizes, occurred on 18 % of the days in Hyytiälä. The transported events and ion bursts were characterized by less favourable ambient conditions than regional NPF events and thus experienced interrupted particle formation or growth. Non-events occurred on 41 % of the days and were characterized by complete cloud cover and high relative humidity. Moreover, for regional NPF events occurring at the measurement site, the method identifies the start time, peak time and end time, which helps us focus on variables within an exact time window to better understand NPF at a process level. Our automated method can be modified to work in other measurement locations where NPF is observed.

[1]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Intermediate ions as a strong indicator of new particle formation bursts in a boreal forest , 2016 .

[2]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Long-term analysis of clear-sky new particle formation events and nonevents in Hyytiälä , 2016 .

[3]  S. Martin,et al.  Ground-based observation of clusters and nucleation-mode particles in the Amazon , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[4]  Pasi Aalto,et al.  Smart-SMEAR: on-line data exploration and visualization tool for SMEAR stations , 2009 .

[5]  L. Ahonen,et al.  Vertical profiles of sub-3 nm particles over the boreal forest , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[6]  L. Morawska,et al.  New particle formation in China: Current knowledge and further directions. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  T. Petäjä,et al.  New particle formation in the free troposphere: A question of chemistry and timing , 2016, Science.

[8]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Atmospheric new particle formation and growth: review of field observations , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[9]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Observations of biogenic ion-induced cluster formation in the atmosphere , 2018, Science Advances.

[10]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Classifying previously undefined days from eleven years of aerosol-particle-size distribution data from the SMEAR II station, Hyytiälä, Finland , 2008 .

[11]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Trends in atmospheric new-particle formation: 16 years of observations in a boreal-forest environment , 2014 .

[12]  C. O'Dowd,et al.  Number size distributions and seasonality of submicron particles in europe 2008–2009 , 2011 .

[13]  A. Ding,et al.  Atmospheric gas-to-particle conversion: why NPF events are observed in megacities? , 2017, Faraday discussions.

[14]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Long-term field measurements of charged and neutral clusters using Neutral cluster and Air Ion Spectrometer (NAIS) , 2009 .

[15]  G. Mann,et al.  Impact of nucleation on global CCN , 2009 .

[16]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Technical note: New particle formation event forecasts during PEGASOS–Zeppelin Northern mission 2013 in Hyytiälä, Finland , 2015 .

[17]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Growth rates of nucleation mode particles in Hyytiälä during 2003−2009: variation with particle size, season, data analysis method and ambient conditions , 2011 .

[18]  A. Ding,et al.  On secondary new particle formation in China , 2016, Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering.

[19]  Tuomas Laurila,et al.  On measurements of aerosol particles and greenhouse gases in Siberia and future research needs , 2011 .

[20]  Sophocles J. Orfanidis,et al.  Introduction to signal processing , 1995 .

[21]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Direct Observations of Atmospheric Aerosol Nucleation , 2013, Science.

[22]  Markku Kulmala,et al.  Build a global Earth observatory , 2018, Nature.

[23]  Paulo Artaxo,et al.  Atmospheric aerosols in Amazonia and land use change: from natural biogenic to biomass burning conditions. , 2013, Faraday discussions.

[24]  A. Mirme,et al.  The mathematical principles and design of the NAIS – a spectrometer for the measurement of cluster ion and nanometer aerosol size distributions , 2011 .

[25]  T. Petäjä,et al.  How to reliably detect molecular clusters and nucleation mode particles withNeutral cluster and Air Ion Spectrometer (NAIS) , 2016 .

[26]  M. Kulmala,et al.  Regional effect on urban atmospheric nucleation , 2016 .

[27]  C. O'Dowd,et al.  Physical characterization of aerosol particles during nucleation events , 2001 .

[28]  Cloud condensation nuclei production associated with atmospheric nucleation: a synthesis based on existing literature and new results , 2012 .

[29]  Miikka Dal Maso,et al.  Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[30]  G. Mann,et al.  Explaining global surface aerosol number concentrations in terms of primary emissions and particle formation , 2009 .

[31]  L. Ahonen,et al.  Solar eclipse demonstrating the importance of photochemistry in new particle formation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[32]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  A look at aerosol formation using data mining techniques , 2005 .

[33]  A. Arneth,et al.  EUCAARI ion spectrometer measurements at 12 European sites – analysis of new particle formation events , 2010 .

[34]  The effect of cloudiness on new particle formation: investigation of radiation levels , 2014 .

[35]  Frank Arnold,et al.  The role of relative humidity in continental new particle formation , 2011 .

[36]  Miikka Dal Maso,et al.  Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, Hyytiälä, Finland , 2005 .

[37]  Eero Nikinmaa,et al.  Station for Measuring Ecosystem-Atmosphere Relations: SMEAR , 2013 .

[38]  D. Brus,et al.  Aerosol size distribution seasonal characteristics measured in Tiksi, Russian Arctic , 2015 .

[39]  M. D. Maso,et al.  Probability of nucleation events and aerosol particle concentration in different air mass types arriving at Hyytiälä, southern Finland, based on back trajectories analysis , 2005 .

[40]  M. Kulmala,et al.  A long-term comparison of nighttime cluster events and daytime ion formation in a boreal forest , 2016 .