Comparison of Different Feedback Procedures in Second Language Vocabulary Learning

Research into the learning of Second Language (SL) vocabulary by beginning learners has indicated that the simultaneous presentation of the First and Second Language words results in blocking of the learning process by the familiar First Language (FL) word. Previous research also suggests that blocking by the First Language can be eliminated by bringing it in as informative feedback (either as a written or spoken word). Our experiments were designed to further extend this research. The use of a picture, either as feedback or simultaneously presented with its equivalent, along with the aural feedback and the conventional procedures were investigated in Experiment 1. Results revealed that pictures blocked the learning process less than the written FL word when both were presented with their SL referent. When used as feedback, however, pictures were not as good as the spoken FL word. Experiment 2 demonstrated that aural feedback was the best type of feedback when compared with the picture and written FL presentations, and that the picture feedback was better than the written feedback. Taken together, the results of these two studies showed that all forms of feedback overcame the problem of blocking created by simultaneous presentation of the FL and SL words, and that aural feedback was the most effective feedback procedure. It was suggested that the superiority of aural feedback was likely to be a consequence of the use of a different input channel to that of the visually presented written SL word.

[1]  Nancy E. Webber Pictures and Words as Stimuli in Learning Foreign Language Responses , 1978 .

[2]  A. Paivio Imagery and verbal processes , 1972 .

[3]  L. Kamin Attention-like processes in classical conditioning , 1967 .

[4]  R. Solman,et al.  Language transfer and blocking in second language vocabulary learning , 1996 .

[5]  S. Deno Effects of words and pictures as stimuli in learning language equivalents. , 1968, Journal of educational psychology.

[6]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[7]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[8]  L. Kamin Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning , 1967 .

[9]  Francis T. Durso,et al.  Facilitation in naming and categorizing repeated pictures and words. , 1979 .

[10]  A. Paivio Coding Distinctions and Repetition Effects in Memory1 , 1975 .

[11]  The relation between mode of presentation and retention. , 1912 .

[12]  D. Neale,et al.  Differential memory for picture and word stimuli. , 1967, Journal of educational psychology.

[13]  F. W. Wicker,et al.  On the locus of picture-word differences in paired-associate learning , 1970 .

[14]  A. R. Wagner,et al.  One-trial overshadowing: evidence of distributive processing. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[15]  D. Berlyne A theory of human curiosity. , 1954, British journal of psychology.

[16]  Cue selection in paired-associate learning. , 1962 .

[17]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning , 1971 .

[18]  G. Bower,et al.  Attention in Learning: Theory and Research , 1968 .

[19]  Roger Bruning,et al.  Cognitive psychology for teachers , 1990 .

[20]  A. Paivio Mental imagery in associative learning and memory , 1969 .

[21]  V. S. Reed,et al.  Learning to Order Pictures and Words: A Model of Sensory and Semantic Encoding. , 1977 .

[22]  R. Solman,et al.  The effect of aural feedback in second language vocabulary learning , 1995 .

[23]  R. Ammons Effects of Knowledge of Performance: A Survey and Tentative Theoretical Formulation , 1956 .

[24]  R. Solman,et al.  Pictures as Feedback in Single Word Learning , 1995 .

[25]  R. Solman,et al.  Effective use of pictures as extra stimulus prompts. , 1993, The British journal of educational psychology.

[26]  B. Wasser,et al.  On the fate of visual and verbal memory codes for pictures and words: Evidence for a dual coding mechanism in recognition memory , 1974 .

[27]  E. Kehoe CS-US contiguity and CS intensity in conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to serial compound stimuli. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[28]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Effects of decision difficulty on recognition and recall , 1979 .

[29]  R. Haber,et al.  Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli , 1970 .

[30]  Robert T. Elliott,et al.  FIRST LANGUAGE WORDS AS EXTRA-STIMULUS PROMPTS IN LEARNING SECOND LANGUAGE VOCABULARY , 1997 .