Geostatistical modeling of the spatial variability of arsenic in groundwater of southeast Michigan

During the last decade one has witnessed an increasing interest in assessing healthrisks caused by exposure to contaminants present in the soil, air, and water. A keycomponent of any exposure study is a reliable model for the space-time distribution ofpollutants. This paper compares the performances of multi-Gaussian and indicator krigingfor modeling probabilistically the spatial distribution of arsenic concentrations ingroundwater of southeast Michigan, accounting for arsenic data collected at privateresidential wells and the hydrogeochemistry of the area. The arsenic data set, which wasprovided by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), includesmeasurements collected between 1993 and 2002 at 8212 different wells. Factorial krigingwas used to filter the short-range spatial variability in arsenic concentration, leading to asignificant increase (17–65%) in the proportion of variance explained by secondaryinformation, such as type of unconsolidated deposits and proximity to Marshall Sandstonesubcrop. Cross validation of well data shows that accounting for this regional backgrounddoes not improve the local prediction of arsenic, which reveals the presence ofunexplained sources of variability and the importance of modeling the uncertaintyattached to these predictions. Slightly more precise models of uncertainty were obtainedusing indicator kriging. Well data collected in 2004 were compared to the predictionmodelandbestresultswerefoundforsoftindicatorkrigingwhichhasameanabsoluteerrorof 5.6 mg/L. Although this error is large with respect to the USEPA standard of 10 mg/L,it is smaller than the average difference (12.53 mg/L) between data collected at the samewell and day, as reported in the MDEQ data set. Thus the uncertainty attached to thesampled values themselves, which arises from laboratory errors and lack of informationregarding the sample origin, contributes to the poor accuracy of the geostatisticalpredictions in southeast Michigan.

[1]  P. Goovaerts Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall , 2000 .

[2]  Yvan Pannatier,et al.  Variowin: Software for Spatial Data Analysis in 2D , 1996 .

[3]  Jerome O. Nriagu,et al.  Natural sources of arsenic in Southeastern Michigan groundwater , 2003 .

[4]  Dennis R. Helsel,et al.  Arsenic in Ground Water of the United States: Occurrence and Geochemistry , 2000 .

[5]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Variowin: Software for Spatial Data Analysis , 1996 .

[6]  Michael F. Goodchild The Application of Advanced Information Technology in Assessing Environmental Impacts , 2015 .

[7]  Myoung-Jin Kim,et al.  Arsenic species and chemistry in groundwater of southeast Michigan. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[8]  Phaedon C. Kyriakidis,et al.  Geostatistical Space–Time Models: A Review , 1999 .

[9]  T. Arnold,et al.  Arsenic in Illinois Ground Water-Community and Private Supplies , 2003 .

[10]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[11]  R. Ortega,et al.  The concentrations of arsenic and other toxic elements in Bangladesh's drinking water. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  Charles F. Harvey,et al.  Arsenic in groundwater in Bangladesh: A geostatistical and epidemiological framework for evaluating health effects and potential remedies , 2003 .

[13]  T. Schneider Improving exposure assessment requires measurements and modeling. , 2002, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[14]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Factorial kriging analysis of springwater contents in the Dyle River Basin, Belgium , 1993 .

[15]  R. Olea Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation By Pierre Goovaerts, Oxford University Press, Applied Geostatistics Series, 1997, 483 p., hardcover, $65 (U.S.), ISBN 0-19-511538-4 , 1999 .

[16]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[17]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science , 2001 .

[18]  G. Jacquez,et al.  Visualization and exploratory analysis of epidemiologic data using a novel space time information system , 2004, International journal of health geographics.

[19]  G. Christakos,et al.  An Application of the Holistochastic Human Exposure Methodology to Naturally Occurring Arsenic in Bangladesh Drinking Water , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Geoffrey M. Jacquez,et al.  Improving exposure assessment in environmental epidemiology: Application of spatio-temporal visualization tools , 2005, J. Geogr. Syst..

[21]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Geostatistical Interpolation of Positively Skewed and Censored Data in a Dioxin-Contaminated Site , 2000 .

[22]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Error Propagation in Environmental Modelling with GIS , 1998 .

[23]  Craig Steinmaus,et al.  Case-control study of bladder cancer and drinking water arsenic in the western United States. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[24]  Eulogio Padro-Igúzquiza VARFIT: a fortran-77 program for fitting variogram models by weighted least squares , 1999 .

[25]  A. Journel Nonparametric estimation of spatial distributions , 1983 .

[26]  Myoung-Jin Kim,et al.  Arsenic in southeastern Michigan , 2003 .