Laser-induced damage threshold of camera sensors and micro-optoelectromechanical systems

Abstract. The continuous development of laser systems toward more compact and efficient devices constitutes an increasing threat to electro-optical imaging sensors, such as complementary metal–oxide–semiconductors (CMOS) and charge-coupled devices. These types of electronic sensors are used in day-to-day life but also in military or civil security applications. In camera systems dedicated to specific tasks, micro-optoelectromechanical systems, such as a digital micromirror device (DMD), are part of the optical setup. In such systems, the DMD can be located at an intermediate focal plane of the optics and it is also susceptible to laser damage. The goal of our work is to enhance the knowledge of damaging effects on such devices exposed to laser light. The experimental setup for the investigation of laser-induced damage is described in detail. As laser sources, both pulsed lasers and continuous-wave (CW)-lasers are used. The laser-induced damage threshold is determined by the single-shot method by increasing the pulse energy from pulse to pulse or in the case of CW-lasers, by increasing the laser power. Furthermore, we investigate the morphology of laser-induced damage patterns and the dependence of the number of destructive device elements on the laser pulse energy or laser power. In addition to the destruction of single pixels, we observe aftereffects, such as persistent dead columns or rows of pixels in the sensor image.

[1]  Juergen Jandeleit,et al.  Picosecond laser ablation of thin copper films , 1996 .

[2]  R. M. Wood,et al.  Laser induced damage thresholds and laser safety levels. Do the units of measurement matter , 1998 .

[3]  Jian Lu,et al.  Laser-induced damage threshold of silicon in millisecond, nanosecond, and picosecond regimes , 2010 .

[4]  J. Liu Simple technique for measurements of pulsed Gaussian-beam spot sizes. , 1982, Optics letters.

[5]  Gunnar Ritt,et al.  Electro-optical sensor with spatial and spectral filtering capability. , 2011, Applied optics.

[6]  B. Eberle,et al.  Research on laser protection: an overview of 20 years of activities at Fraunhofer IOSB , 2013, Optics/Photonics in Security and Defence.

[7]  Gunnar Ritt,et al.  Protection performance evaluation regarding imaging sensors hardened against laser dazzling , 2014, Security and Defence.

[8]  A. I. Frolov,et al.  Simple method of determining the size of small-diameter Gaussian beams , 1987 .

[9]  David R Walt,et al.  Note: Toward multiple addressable optical trapping. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[10]  Gunnar Ritt,et al.  Automatic Suppression of Intense Monochromatic Light in Electro-Optical Sensors , 2012, Sensors.

[11]  Xisheng Ye,et al.  Experimental study of the damage of silicon photoelectric detector materials induced by repetitively pulsed femtosecond laser , 2013, Other Conferences.

[12]  Study of the mechanism of electronic diffusion in a CCD camera subject to intense laser illumination , 1997, RADECS 97. Fourth European Conference on Radiation and its Effects on Components and Systems (Cat. No.97TH8294).

[13]  Michael F. Becker,et al.  Laser-induced functional damage to silicon CCD sensor arrays , 1992, Laser Damage.

[14]  Gunnar Ritt,et al.  Automatic Laser Glare Suppression in Electro-Optical Sensors , 2015, Sensors.

[15]  Ang Wang,et al.  Damage effect on CMOS detector irradiated by single-pulse laser , 2013, Other Conferences.

[17]  John M. Boone,et al.  Flat-field correction technique for digital detectors , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[18]  C. Giuliano,et al.  Laser-Induced Damage in Optical Materials , 1973 .

[19]  Sergey I. Kudryashov,et al.  Single-shot and single-spot measurement of laser ablation threshold for carbon nanotubes , 2013, 1308.1866.

[20]  Michael F. Becker,et al.  Laser-Induced Damage To Silicon CCD Imaging Sensors , 1989, Defense, Security, and Sensing.