Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT The vertebral spine angle in the frontal plane is an important parameter in the assessment of scoliosis and may be obtained from panoramic X-ray images. Technological advances have allowed for an increased use of digital X-ray images in clinical practice. PURPOSE In this context, the objective of this study is to assess the reliability of computer-assisted Cobb angle measurements taken from digital X-ray images. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Clinical investigation quantifying scoliotic deformity with Cobb method to evaluate the intra- and interobserver variability using manual and digital techniques. PATIENT SAMPLE Forty-nine patients diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis were chosen based on convenience, without predilection for gender, age, type, location, or magnitude of the curvature. OUTCOME MEASURES Images were examined to evaluate Cobb angle variability, end plate selection, as well as intra- and interobserver errors. METHODS Specific software was developed to digitally reproduce the Cobb method and calculate semiautomatically the degree of scoliotic deformity. During the study, three observers estimated the Cobb angle using both the digital and the traditional manual methods. RESULTS The results showed that Cobb angle measurements may be reproduced in the computer as reliably as with the traditional manual method, in similar conditions to those found in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS The computer-assisted method (digital method) is clinically advantageous and appropriate to assess the scoliotic curvature in the frontal plane using Cobb method.

[1]  Ian A. F. Stokes,et al.  Computer-Assisted Algorithms Improve Reliability of King Classification and Cobb Angle Measurement of Scoliosis , 2006, Spine.

[2]  D. Polly,et al.  Measurement of Lumbar Lordosis: Evaluation of Intraobserver, Interobserver, and Technique Variability , 1996, Spine.

[3]  A. Oliveira,et al.  Validity and reliability of a computer method to estimate vertebral axial rotation from digital radiographs , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[4]  F. Pernus,et al.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[5]  C. Adam,et al.  Variability in Cobb Angle Measurements Using Reformatted Computerized Tomography Scans , 2005, Spine.

[6]  A. Oestreich,et al.  Scoliosis circa 2000: radiologic imaging perspective , 1998, Skeletal Radiology.

[7]  Bert Verdonck,et al.  The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[8]  C. Bach,et al.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[9]  A. Oestreich,et al.  Scoliosis circa 2000: radiologic imaging perspective , 1998, Skeletal Radiology.

[10]  Ewa Pietka,et al.  Informatics infrastructure of CAD system. , 2005, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[11]  S J Dwyer,et al.  Computerized measurement and analysis of scoliosis: a more accurate representation of the shape of the curve. , 1980, Radiology.

[12]  A. Veldhuizen,et al.  Analysis of Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. , 1987, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  J. Auerbach,et al.  Comparison of Cobb Angle Measurement of Scoliosis Radiographs With Preselected End Vertebrae: Traditional Versus Digital Acquisition , 2007, Spine.

[14]  M. O’Brien,et al.  Comparison of Manual and Digital Measurements in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2006, Spine.

[15]  M G Ehrlich,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in the evaluation of scoliosis: an application of digital radiography. , 1986, Radiology.

[16]  T. Cochrane,et al.  Computer-assisted Cobb measurement of scoliosis , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[17]  E. Berthonnaud,et al.  Analysis of structural features of deformed spines in frontal and sagittal projections , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[18]  A. Mehbod,et al.  The Assessment of Intraobserver and Interobserver Error in the Measurement of Noncongenital Scoliosis in Children ≤ 10 Years of Age , 2004, Spine.

[19]  Lawrence W. C. Chan,et al.  Computer-Generated Index for Evaluation of Idiopathic Scoliosis in Digital Chest Images: A Comparison with Digital Measurement , 2007, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[20]  R. Vialle,et al.  Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 × 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films? , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[21]  David W. Polly,et al.  Reliability Analysis for Manual Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Measurements , 2005, Spine.

[22]  J O'Connor,et al.  Reliability of the Cobb angle index derived by traditional and computer assisted methods. , 1989, Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine.

[23]  Cobb,et al.  Outlines for the study of scoliosis , 1948 .

[24]  E. Hall,et al.  Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  W. Skalli,et al.  Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[26]  Edmond Lou,et al.  Validity and Reliability of Active Shape Models for the Estimation of Cobb Angle in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[27]  K. Shea,et al.  A Comparison of Manual Versus Computer‐Assisted Radiographic Measurement: Intraobserver Measurement Variability for Cobb Angles , 1998, Spine.