Classic and Current Social Comparison Research : Expanding the Perspective

This article assumes that social comparisons (a) constitute comparative judgments governed by the general process that applies to all judgments, (b) possess a common comparative structure including simple judgments of comparison stimuli and their juxtaposition, and (c) possess unique contents that determine the subjective meanings of comparison outcomes and their psychological implications. Examined in these terms, classical social comparison theory is found wanting in two respects: (a) It conveys a relatively fixed notion of social comparison in which people are generally driven to compare and do so mostly with respect to similar others and predominantly for the sake of evaluative accuracy. (b) Its narrow scope excludes numerous significant issues of interest to social comparison research today. It is proposed that the present, multilevel approach is useful for ordering past social comparison research and provides a heuristically rich paradigm for future work.

[1]  R. Fazio.  Motives for Social Comparison: The Construction-Validation Distinction , 1979 .

[2]  C. L. Gruder,et al.  Determinants of social comparison choices , 1971 .

[3]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Social Comparison Choices for Evaluating a Sexand Age-Related Ability , 1978 .

[4]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[5]  J. S. Shrauger,et al.  Social validation and interpersonal evaluations , 1968 .

[6]  A. Tesser,et al.  Friendship Choice and Performance: Self-Evaluation Maintenance in Children , 1984 .

[7]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Opinion change and communicator-communicatee similarity and dissimilarity. , 1966 .

[8]  Charles L. Gruder,et al.  Factors determining choice of a comparison other , 1969 .

[9]  J. C. Masters,et al.  Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation : theoretical, empirical, and policy perspectives , 1987 .

[10]  J. Singer,et al.  Social comparison—Progress and issues , 1966 .

[11]  C. Wortman,et al.  Social Support and the Cancer Patient , 1984, Cancer.

[12]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Perceived qualifications, resource abundance, and resentment about deprivation☆ , 1984 .

[13]  Other Factors Determining the Choice of a Comparison Other. , 1969 .

[14]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[15]  SELF-CONCEPT AND DISSONANCE REDUCTION. , 1963, Journal of personality.

[16]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  The influence of unique features and direction of comparison of preferences , 1989 .

[17]  E. Higgins,et al.  Standards and the process of self-evaluation: Multiple affects from multiple stages. , 1986 .

[18]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nature of Priming Effects on Categorization , 1985 .

[19]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[20]  A. Tesser.  Reproductions Supplied by Edrs Are the Best That Can Be Made * * from the Original Document. toward a Self-evaluation Maintenance Model of Social Behavior* , 2007 .

[21]  E. Hearst,et al.  Detecting and identifying change: additions versus deletions. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  E.,et al.  Self-Discrepancy : A Theory Relating Self and Affect , 2022 .

[23]  B. Major,et al.  Social comparison processes and judgments of entitlement and satisfaction , 1989 .

[24]  S. E. Taylor,et al.  Social comparison activity under threat: downward evaluation and upward contacts. , 1989, Psychological review.

[25]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  A view from a bridge: Synthesizing the consistency and attribution paradigms from a lay epistemic perspective , 1987 .

[26]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Bias and error in human judgment , 1983 .

[27]  A. Tesser,et al.  Self‐evaluation maintenance and the perception of friends and strangers , 1982 .

[28]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[29]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies , 1976 .

[30]  E. Higgins.  Personality, social psychology, and person-situation relations: Standards and knowledge activation as a common language. , 1990 .

[31]  M. Zanna,et al.  Validating Objective Versus Subjective Judgments , 1983 .

[32]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivational effects in the social comparison of opinions. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  S. Albert,et al.  Temporal comparison theory. , 1977 .

[34]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Social reference points , 1983 .

[35]  A. Kruglanski.  Lay epistemo-logic—process and contents: Another look at attribution theory. , 1980 .

[36]  T. Pettigrew.  Social evaluation theory: Convergences and applications. , 1967 .

[37]  Ladd Wheeler,et al.  Related attributes in the choice of comparison others: It's there, but it isn't all there is , 1982 .

[38]  E. Higgins,et al.  Automatic activation of self-discrepancies and emotional syndromes: when cognitive structures influence affect. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Ladd Wheeler,et al.  Motivation as a determinant of upward comparison , 1966 .

[40]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Particularistic and universalistic evaluation in the social comparison process. , 1988 .

[41]  George R. Goethals,et al.  Similarity in the influence process: The belief-value distinction. , 1973 .

[42]  James M. Olson,et al.  Relative deprivation and social comparison , 1986 .

[43]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[44]  J. D. Campbell.  Similarity and uniqueness: the effects of attribute type, relevance, and individual differences in self-esteem and depression. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  S. Read.  Similarity and causality in the use of social analogies , 1987 .

[46]  J. Suls.  Notes on the Occasion of Social Comparison Theory's Thirtieth Birthday , 1986 .

[47]  George R. Goethals,et al.  Social Comparison Theory , 1986 .

[48]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Information-gathering strategies in hypothesis-testing , 1983 .

[49]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivations for judging and knowing: Implications for causal attribution. , 1990 .

[50]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Evaluating a sex-related ability: Social comparison with similar others and standard setters , 1975 .

[51]  Ladd Wheeler,et al.  Performance evaluation: On choosing to know the related attributes of others when we know their performance , 1984 .

[52]  D. Yagil,et al.  Self-Evaluation Maintenance and the Motivation to Interact , 1989 .

[53]  M. Brodbeck,et al.  The role of small groups in mediating the effects of propaganda. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[54]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  What Makes You So Sure? Effects of Epistemic Motivations on judgmental Confidence , 1987 .

[55]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  The Freezing and Unfreezing of Impressional Primacy , 1985 .

[56]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Seeking information about one's ability as a determinant of choice among tasks , 1975 .

[57]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[58]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[59]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information , 1981 .

[60]  K. L. Hakmiller,et al.  Threat as a determinant of downward comparison , 1966 .

[61]  R. Friend,et al.  Threat and fear of negative evaluation as determinants of locus of social comparison. , 1973, Journal of personality.

[62]  Stephen R. Wilson,et al.  The effects of self-esteem and situation upon comparison choices during ability evaluation. , 1971 .

[63]  Carol T. Miller.  Self-schemas, gender, and social comparison: A clarification of the related attributes hypothesis. , 1984 .

[64]  E. Aronson,et al.  The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness , 1966 .

[65]  Y. Trope.  Self-assessment, self-enhancement, and task preference. , 1980 .

[66]  John M. Levine,et al.  Social comparison and outcome evaluation in group contexts. , 1987 .

[67]  A. Arrowood,et al.  Self-evaluation, self-enhancement, and the locus of social comparison☆ , 1966 .

[68]  S. Shoptaw,et al.  Social support, support groups, and the cancer patient. , 1986, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[69]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Context, categorization, and recall: The “change-of-standard” effect , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[70]  Gary Marks,et al.  Thinking One's Abilities Are Unique and One's Opinions Are Common , 1984 .

[71]  L. Ross,et al.  Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[72]  T. Wills.  Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[73]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Two Indirect Tactics of Image Management: Basking and Blasting , 1980 .

[74]  E. Higgins,et al.  Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. , 1982 .

[75]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[76]  G. Goethals.  Consensus and Modality in the Attribution Process: The Role of Similarity and Information. , 1972 .

[77]  E. Higgins,et al.  Self-discrepancies and emotional vulnerability: how magnitude, accessibility, and type of discrepancy influence affect. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[78]  Deviancy and Group Orientation as Determinants of Group Composition Preferences , 1973 .

[79]  William G. Austin,et al.  Internal standards revisited: Effects of social comparisons and expectancies on judgments of fairness and satisfaction , 1980 .

[80]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Contextual Effects in Hypothesis Testing: The Role of Competing Alternatives and Epistemic Motivations , 1988 .

[81]  T. K. Srull,et al.  General Principles and Individual Differences in the Self as a Habitual Reference Point: An Examination of Self-Other Judgments of Similarity , 1983 .