Automatic Thalamus Segmentation from Magnetic Resonance Images Using Multiple Atlases Level Set Framework (MALSF)

In this paper, we present an original multiple atlases level set framework (MALSF) for automatic, accurate and robust thalamus segmentation in magnetic resonance images (MRI). The contributions of the MALSF method are twofold. First, the main technical contribution is a novel label fusion strategy in the level set framework. Label fusion is achieved by seeking an optimal level set function that minimizes energy functional with three terms: label fusion term, image based term, and regularization term. This strategy integrates shape prior, image information and the regularity of the thalamus. Second, we use propagated labels from multiple registration methods with different parameters to take full advantage of the complementary information of different registration methods. Since different registration methods and different atlases can yield complementary information, multiple registration and multiple atlases can be incorporated into the level set framework to improve the segmentation performance. Experiments have shown that the MALSF method can improve the segmentation accuracy for the thalamus. Compared to ground truth segmentation, the mean Dice metrics of our method are 0.9239 and 0.9200 for left and right thalamus.

[1]  Cecilia Sjöberg,et al.  Multi-atlas based segmentation using probabilistic label fusion with adaptive weighting of image similarity measures , 2013, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[2]  Chunming Li,et al.  Distance Regularized Level Set Evolution and Its Application to Image Segmentation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Simon K. Warfield,et al.  Estimating A Reference Standard Segmentation With Spatially Varying Performance Parameters: Local MAP STAPLE , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Yogesh Rathi,et al.  Image Segmentation Using Active Contours Driven by the Bhattacharyya Gradient Flow , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Multi-Atlas Segmentation with Joint Label Fusion , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Sim Heng Ong,et al.  Integrating spatial fuzzy clustering with level set methods for automated medical image segmentation , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[7]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  A generative probability model of joint label fusion for multi-atlas based brain segmentation , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Yi Gao,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of the Left Atrium From MR Images via Variational Region Growing With a Moments-Based Shape Prior , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Chong-Sze Tong,et al.  Texture Classification Using Refined Histogram , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Appearance-based modeling for segmentation of hippocampus and amygdala using multi-contrast MR imaging , 2011, NeuroImage.

[12]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  DRAMMS: Deformable Registration via Attribute Matching and Mutual-Saliency Weighting , 2009, IPMI.

[13]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  A Nonrigid Registration Framework Using Spatially Encoded Mutual Information and Free-Form Deformations , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Meritxell Bach Cuadra,et al.  A review of atlas-based segmentation for magnetic resonance brain images , 2011, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[15]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Label Fusion in Atlas-Based Segmentation Using a Selective and Iterative Method for Performance Level Estimation (SIMPLE) , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  P. T. Nguyen,et al.  Statistical Parametric Mapping reveals ligand and region-specific activation of G-proteins by CB1 receptors and non-CB1 sites in the 3D reconstructed mouse brain , 2010, NeuroImage.

[18]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Multi-Object Geodesic Active Contours (MOGAC) , 2012, MICCAI.

[19]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Automatic thalamus and hippocampus segmentation from MP2RAGE: comparison of publicly available methods and implications for DTI quantification , 2016, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[20]  Arno Klein,et al.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration , 2011, NeuroImage.

[21]  Pierre Hellier,et al.  Segmentation of brain 3D MR images using level sets and dense registration , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  Huafeng Liu,et al.  Geodesic Active Contours with Adaptive Neighboring Influence , 2005, MICCAI.

[23]  Allen R. Tannenbaum,et al.  Localizing Region-Based Active Contours , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[24]  Chunming Li,et al.  Minimization of Region-Scalable Fitting Energy for Image Segmentation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[25]  Wenbing Tao Iterative Narrowband-Based Graph Cuts Optimization for Geodesic Active Contours With Region Forces (GACWRF) , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  Bennett A. Landman,et al.  Formulating Spatially Varying Performance in the Statistical Fusion Framework , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Petros Maragos,et al.  Multigrid Geometric Active Contour Models , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[28]  L. Wichert-Ana,et al.  Medical image registration using TSallis Entropy in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[29]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Automated contour detection in X-ray left ventricular angiograms using multiview active appearance models and dynamic programming , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Wei Li,et al.  Automatic hippocampus segmentation of 7.0Tesla MR images by combining multiple atlases and auto-context models , 2013, NeuroImage.