Efficient design sensitivities of structures subjected to dynamic loading

Calculation of design sensitivities often involves much computational effort, particularly in large structural systems with many design variables. Approximation concepts, which are often used to reduce the computational cost involved in repeated analysis, are usually not sufficiently accurate for sensitivity analysis. In this study, approximate reanalysis is used to improve the efficiency of dynamic sensitivity analysis. Using modal analysis, the response derivatives with respect to design variables are presented as a combination of sensitivities of the eigenvectors and the generalized displacements. A procedure intended to reduce the number of differential equations that must be solved during the solution process is proposed. Efficient evaluation of the derivatives, using finite difference and the recently developed combined approximations approach, is presented. Numerical examples show that high accuracy of design sensitivities can be achieved efficiently.

[1]  Fred van Keulen,et al.  Efficient Finite Difference Design Sensitivities , 2005 .

[2]  Uri Kirsch,et al.  Efficient Dynamic Reanalysis of Structures , 2007 .

[3]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of nonlinear transient dynamics , 2000 .

[4]  John Rasmussen,et al.  On Accuracy Problems for Semi-Analytical Sensitivity Analyses , 1989 .

[5]  Uri Kirsch,et al.  A unified reanalysis approach for structural analysis, design, and optimization , 2003 .

[6]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Accurate displacement derivatives for structural optimization using approximate reanalysis , 2001 .

[7]  Uri Kirsch,et al.  Approximate Vibration Reanalysis of Structures , 2002 .

[8]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Accuracy problems associated with semi-analytical derivatives of static response , 1988 .

[9]  Uri Kirsch,et al.  Procedures for approximate eigenproblem reanalysis of structures , 2004 .

[10]  Donald E. Grierson,et al.  Computer automated design of structures under dynamic loads , 1989 .

[11]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems , 1986 .

[12]  R. Barton COMPUTING FORWARD DIFFERENCE DERIVATIVES IN ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION , 1992 .

[13]  Uri Kirsch Efficient sensitivity analysis for structural optimization , 1994 .

[14]  U. Kirsch,et al.  Efficient structural optimization using reanalysis and sensitivity reanalysis , 2007, Engineering with Computers.

[15]  R. Haftka,et al.  Review of options for structural design sensitivity analysis. Part 1: Linear systems , 2005 .

[16]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of non‐linear transient dynamics. Part I—sizing design , 2000 .

[17]  R. Haftka,et al.  Elements of Structural Optimization , 1984 .

[18]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis , 1989 .

[19]  I. Sheinman,et al.  Dynamic Sensitivities Using Efficient Reanalysis Of Structures , 2006 .