Environmental Sustainability Assessment of an Innovative Cr (III) Passivation Process

A life cycle assessment was conducted for the Zn-electroplating products passivated by different processes in a small and medium enterprise. The goal was to evaluate and to compare the environmental impact associated to the conventional and alternative passivation process from a “cradle to grave” analysis. The assessment was divided into “cradle to gate”, “gate to gate”, and “gate to grave” steps for natural resources usage and environmental burdens. The innovative process was based on the integration of emulsion pertraction technology to the passivation bath in order to extend its lifetime. Results showed that the transferred hazardous waste from the process to the landfill was the major contributor to the environmental impact of the conventional and innovative passivation. The manufacture of the sodium hydroxide needed in the wastewater treatment process had a main role in the impacts of the “cradle to gate” cycle. This work concluded that the innovative passivation decreased most of the generated waste...

[1]  Yasunori Kikuchi,et al.  Analysis of risk trade-off relationships between organic solvents and aqueous agents: case study of metal cleaning processes , 2011 .

[2]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Allocation of environmental burdens in co-product systems: Product-related burdens (Part 1) , 1999 .

[3]  I. Ortiz,et al.  Zinc recovery and waste sludge minimization from chromium passivation baths. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  I. Ortiz,et al.  The role of liquid membranes in the selective separation and recovery of zinc for the regeneration of Cr(III) passivation baths , 2010 .

[5]  Eugenio Bringas,et al.  Development and validation of a dynamic model for regeneration of passivating baths using membrane contactors , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[6]  Byeong-Kyu Lee,et al.  Sludge minimization and production improvement by changing filtration and reaction techniques in vinyl acetate-ethylene copolymerization , 2012 .

[7]  Qiong Ding,et al.  Environmental life-cycle comparisons of two polychlorinated biphenyl remediation technologies: incineration and base catalyzed decomposition. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  Michela Gallo,et al.  Resource productivity enhancement as means for promoting cleaner production: analysis of co-incineration in cement plants through a life cycle approach , 2011 .

[9]  A. E. Jansen,et al.  The membrane contactor: Environmental applications and possibilities , 2001 .

[10]  Daniel Froelich,et al.  Use of LCA to evaluate the environmental benefits of substituting chromic acid anodizing (CAA) , 2008 .

[11]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[13]  Antonio Dominguez-Ramos,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment as a Tool for Cleaner Production: Application to Aluminium Trifluoride , 2007 .

[14]  M. Sarrà,et al.  A comparative life cycle assessment of two treatment technologies for the Grey Lanaset G textile dye: biodegradation by Trametes versicolor and granular activated carbon adsorption , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  Temperature enhancement of zinc and iron separation from chromium(III) passivation baths by emulsion pertraction technology , 2012 .