The Slip-resistance Effect Evaluation of Floor Roughness Under Different Liquid Viscosity

Abstract Slipping, tripping and falling which causes serious damages and losses happen all the time within household and work areas. According the formula of squeeze film, when the floor is contaminated with liquid, the higher the liquid viscosity the longer time to connect shoes with floor, the higher the risk of falling. The appropriate roughness of floor surface could be effective to improve the squeeze film effect caused by liquid while the floor is contaminated by liquid or oil. In kitchens, oil, sauces and liquid with higher viscosity are easily spread on floor. Therefore, this study discussed the influences of liquid viscosity and floor roughness upon slip-resistance effect adopting two shoe materials, six liquid with different viscosity and six floors with different roughness. The results demonstrate that the higher the liquid viscosity the lower the coefficient of friction. No matter how rough the floor is, the coefficient of friction approaches zero while the viscosity larger than 38 mPa.s. With the liquid (water or soda) viscosities were lower than 2mPa.s, the slip resistant effect only shown as the floor roughness (Ra) was larger than 28 μm and Rtm was greater than 145 μm. The slip resistant effect shown as the floor roughness (Ra) must be much greater than 40 μm and Rtm must be much higher than 185 μm while the floor contaminated by liquid with viscosities higher than 2mPa.s. Therefore, the best strategy to prevent slips/falls should be keeping the floor dry all the time.

[1]  T B Leamon,et al.  Occupational slips and falls: more than a trivial problem. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[2]  T. D. Proctor.  Slipping accidents in Great Britain — an update , 1993 .

[3]  Raoul Grönqvist,et al.  Mechanisms of friction and assessment of slip resistance of new and used footwear soles on contaminated floors. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[4]  Wen-Ruey Chang,et al.  The Effects of Surface Roughness and Contaminants on the Dynamic Friction between Porcelain Tile and Vulcanized Rubber , 2000 .

[5]  In-Ju Kim,et al.  Observation of the floor surface topography changes in pedestrian slip resistance measurements , 2000 .

[6]  T. D. Proctor,et al.  Slipping, tripping and falling accidents in Great Britain -- Present and future , 1988 .

[7]  Hisao Nagata,et al.  Microscopic observations of the progressive wear on shoe surfaces that affect the slip resistance characteristics , 2001 .

[8]  Wen-Ruey Chang,et al.  Field evaluation of two commonly used slipmeters. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  W R Chang,et al.  The role of surface roughness in the measurement of slipperiness , 2001, Ergonomics.

[10]  Kai Way Li,et al.  Friction measurements on anti-slip floors under shoe sole, contamination, and inclination conditions , 2010 .

[11]  Wen-Ruey Chang,et al.  Floor slipperiness measurement: friction coefficient, roughness of floors, and subjective perception under spillage conditions , 2004 .

[12]  M. Adams,et al.  The Friction and Lubrication of elastomers , 1995 .

[13]  S. R. Shaw,et al.  Slip resistance of floors: Users' opinions, Tortus instrument readings and roughness measurement , 1988 .

[14]  Wen-Ruey Chang.  The effects of slip criterion and time on friction measurements , 2002 .

[15]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  An investigation of floor surface profile characteristics that will reduce the incidence of slips and falls , 1992 .

[16]  In-Ju Kim.  Development of a new analyzing model for quantifying pedestrian slip resistance characteristics: Part I–Basic concepts and theories , 2004 .

[17]  Wen-Ruey Chang,et al.  Linear regression models of floor surface parameters on friction between Neolite and quarry tiles. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  S. Leclercq,et al.  Tribological concepts involved in slipping accident analysis. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[19]  W R Chang,et al.  The slip resistance of common footwear materials measured with two slipmeters. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.