The Circular Economy and Cascading: Towards a Framework

Abstract The principle of cascading, the sequential and consecutive use of resources, is a potential method to create added value in circular economy (CE) practices. Despite conceptual similarities, no research to date has explored how cascading has been operationalised and how to integrate it with CE R-imperatives (Reduce, Reuse etc.) to facilitate implementation practices. CE practices emphasise value creation and retention, yet, there has been little reflexive examination of explicit and intrinsic value considerations; namely, how allocation choices, i.e. the decision-making process, for resource utilization are made. This paper aims to (1) examine how cascading has been operationalised (empirically and theoretically) to understand its normative underpinnings and value considerations; and (2) integrate cascading with the CE practices in a manner that accounts for the complexities of material allocation choices. Through a literature review of 64 articles from three bodies of literature (CE, cascading and up/downcycling), plus additional material on sustainable development, we show the cascading concept is a suitable framework to direct material uses and provides an overarching concept to integrate with CE R-imperatives. From this, we propose a new theoretical framework that considers the socio-organisational necessities for a CE-cascading system, specifically by deconstructing the allocation choices and exchanges of product material combinations between actor groups. This considers a dual perspective of the physical aspects of materials and the social context in which material allocation is made. The framework transcends individual value chain actor configurations to propose an overarching steering/governance framework, based on the triple-P of sustainability (People, Planet, Prosperity), to examine and direct CE-cascading exchanges, between and above individual users/firms.

[1]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? — Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options , 2017, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[2]  Jouni Korhonen,et al.  Material and energy flows of a local forest industry system in Finland , 2003 .

[3]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Organizing Self‐Organizing Systems , 2012 .

[4]  Carlo Vandecasteele,et al.  Materials Recycling in Construction: A Review of the Last 2 Decades Illustrated by the WASCON Conferences , 2013 .

[5]  Holger Militz,et al.  Wood polymer composites and their contribution to cascading utilisation , 2016 .

[6]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions , 2017 .

[7]  B. Elbersen,et al.  Cascading use: a systematic approach to biomass beyond the energy sector , 2013 .

[8]  N. Jacobsen Industrial Symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A Quantitative Assessment of Economic and Environmental Aspects , 2006 .

[9]  J. Korhonen,et al.  Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations , 2018 .

[10]  N. V. Nes,et al.  Product lifetime optimization: a challenging strategy towards more sustainable consumption patterns , 2006 .

[11]  Patrick Reumerman,et al.  Assessing wood use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of wood product cascading in the European Union , 2018 .

[12]  Hubert Jochheim,et al.  Effect of cascade use on the carbon balance of the German and European wood sectors , 2018 .

[13]  J. Korhonen Regional industrial ecology: examples from regional economic systems of forest industry and energy supply in Finland. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  Ted Sirkin,et al.  The cascade chain: A theory and tool for achieving resource sustainability with applications for product design , 1994 .

[15]  Joyeeta Gupta,et al.  Sustainable development goals and inclusive development , 2016, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[16]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems , 2016 .

[17]  Alberto Bezama,et al.  Let us discuss how cascading can help implement the circular economy and the bio-economy strategies , 2016, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[18]  F. Blomsma,et al.  The Emergence of Circular Economy: A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity , 2017 .

[19]  E. Hultink,et al.  The Circular Economy - A New Sustainability Paradigm? , 2017 .

[20]  Veena Sahajwalla,et al.  Cascading use of textile waste for the advancement of fibre reinforced composites for building applications , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[21]  Omprakash Sarkar,et al.  Waste biorefinery models towards sustainable circular bioeconomy: Critical review and future perspectives. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[22]  Sjors Witjes,et al.  On addressing the dual and embedded nature of business and the route towards corporate sustainability , 2016 .

[23]  Kun-Mo Lee,et al.  Allocation for cascade recycling system , 1997 .

[24]  Karin Weimann,et al.  Building Materials from Waste , 2003 .

[25]  G. O’Brien,et al.  Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development , 2002 .

[26]  W. Stahel The Performance Economy , 2010 .

[27]  Anastasia Zabaniotou,et al.  Food waste valorization advocating Circular Bioeconomy - A critical review of potentialities and perspectives of spent coffee grounds biorefinery , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[28]  Thomas M. Parris,et al.  Characterizing a sustainability transition: Goals, targets, trends, and driving forces , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Jan Broeze,et al.  A research challenge vision regarding management of agricultural waste in a circular bio-based economy , 2018 .

[30]  Walter J.V. Vermeulen,et al.  Social Dimension of Industrial Ecology: on the implications of the inherent nature of social phenomena , 2007 .

[31]  Jenq-Gong Duh,et al.  Scalable Upcycling Silicon from Waste Slicing Sludge for High-performance Lithium-ion Battery Anodes , 2015 .

[32]  Jouni Korhonen,et al.  Industrial ecology flows of agriculture and food industry in Finland: utilizing by-products and wastes , 2003 .

[33]  Walter J.V. Vermeulen,et al.  Substantiating the rough consensus on the concept of sustainable development as a point of departure for indicator development , 2018, Routledge Handbook of Sustainability Indicators.

[34]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  Potentials for cascading of recovered wood from building deconstruction—A case study for south-east Germany , 2013 .

[35]  V. Pol,et al.  Upcycling: converting waste plastics into paramagnetic, conducting, solid, pure carbon microspheres. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Carlos A Garcia,et al.  State-of-the-art of waste wood supply chain in Germany and selected European countries. , 2017, Waste management.

[37]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  A mathematical model and decision-support framework for material recovery, recycling and cascaded use , 2002 .

[38]  Timothy D. Stark,et al.  Sustainable geomembrane recycling and downcycling: Shale oil and gas open sustainability opportunities , 2013 .

[39]  A. Petit‐Boix,et al.  Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy - What can we learn from wood cascading? , 2020 .

[40]  Bernhard Steubing,et al.  Life Cycle Impacts and Benefits of Wood along the Value Chain: The Case of Switzerland , 2017 .

[41]  Keith R. Skene,et al.  The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context , 2015, Journal of Business Ethics.

[42]  Herbert Sixta,et al.  Upcycling of waste paper and cardboard to textiles , 2016 .

[43]  S. Pascucci,et al.  Institutional incentives in circular economy transition: The case of material use in the Dutch textile industry , 2017 .

[44]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Environmentally optimal wood use in Switzerland—Investigating the relevance of material cascades , 2018 .

[45]  J. Eyckmans,et al.  Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making. , 2018, Waste management.

[46]  Monia Niero,et al.  Environmental screening of novel technologies to increase material circularity: A case study on aluminium cans , 2017 .

[47]  K. McCormick,et al.  Towards a Bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and Industrial Strategies , 2015 .

[48]  Desta Mebratu Sustainability and sustainable development: Historical and conceptual review , 1998 .

[49]  Thorsten Wuest,et al.  Cascade Use and the Management of Product Lifecycles , 2017 .

[50]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Recycling of Lumber , 2014 .

[51]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Energy and carbon balances of wood cascade chains , 2006 .

[52]  Aldo Roberto Ometto,et al.  Theoretical contribution of industrial ecology to circular economy , 2018 .

[53]  Marit Aursand,et al.  Cascading Norwegian co-streams for bioeconomic transition , 2018 .

[54]  Peter J. Fraanje,et al.  Towards sustainable use of the renewable resource wood in the Netherlands — a systematic approach , 1997 .

[55]  Maria J Grant,et al.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[56]  Tobias Stern,et al.  Cascading Utilization of Wood: a Matter of Circular Economy? , 2017, Current Forestry Reports.

[57]  A. Valero,et al.  Downcycling in automobile recycling process: A thermodynamic assessment , 2018, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[58]  Florian Lüdeke-Freund,et al.  A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns , 2019 .

[59]  Patrick Lamers,et al.  Time to tear down the pyramids? A critique of cascading hierarchies as a policy tool , 2018 .

[60]  Yiannis A. Levendis,et al.  Upcycling waste plastics into carbon nanomaterials: A review , 2014 .

[61]  Christoph Koffler,et al.  Tackling the Downcycling Issue—A Revised Approach to Value-Corrected Substitution in Life Cycle Assessment of Aluminum (VCS 2.0) , 2013 .

[62]  David Gibbs,et al.  Resource recovery and remediation of highly alkaline residues: A political-industrial ecology approach to building a circular economy , 2017 .

[63]  T. Graedel Industrial Ecology , 1995 .

[64]  M. Hughes,et al.  Forest sector circular economy development in Finland: A regional study on sustainability driven competitive advantage and an assessment of the potential for cascading recovered solid wood , 2017 .

[65]  Denise Reike,et al.  Circular Economy 3.0: getting beyond the messy conceptualization of circularity and the 3R’s, 4R’s and more… , 2018 .

[66]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Cascade utilization of biomass: strategies for a more efficient use of a scarce resource , 2000 .