Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: testing of mediator effects and construct validity

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between course experience, students’ approaches to learning, effort, ability and examination grade, and to examine aspects of construct validity in the present versions of the Course Experience Questionnaire and the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students in a sample of 206 undergraduate psychology students. The results showed that course experience, students’ approaches to learning and ability were significantly correlated with examination grade, whereas effort was not. Structural equation modelling showed that a surface approach mediated the relationship between course experience and academic achievement, whereas ability remained an independent predictor of achievement. These findings indicate that both ability and approaches to learning have considerable independent effects on academic achievement, and that the students’ perceptions of the learning environment are important sources of approaches to learning.

[1]  David Kember,et al.  Influences upon Students’ Perceptions of Workload , 1998 .

[2]  P. Bentler,et al.  Evaluating model fit. , 1995 .

[3]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[4]  Alfred Joseph Lizzio,et al.  University Students' Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for theory and practice , 2002 .

[5]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[6]  Åge Diseth,et al.  Validation of a Norwegian Version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling , 2001 .

[7]  P. Ramsden.  A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire , 1991 .

[8]  A Fransson,et al.  On qualitative differences in learning: IV -- effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome. , 1977, The British journal of educational psychology.

[9]  Angus Duff,et al.  Quality of Learning on an MBA Programme: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance , 2003 .

[10]  D. Laurillard.  The processes of student learning , 1979 .

[11]  Howard Schuman,et al.  Effort and Reward: The Assumption that College Grades Are Affected by Quantity of Study , 1985 .

[12]  Velda McCune,et al.  Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching-learning environments: Measuring students' approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching , 2003 .

[13]  Paul Ramsden,et al.  Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment , 1979 .

[14]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[15]  Velda McCune,et al.  Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts , 2000 .

[16]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in a short web-based course , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  Paul Ramsden,et al.  Context and Strategy , 1988 .

[18]  J. Tourón,et al.  The determination of factors related to academic achievement in the university: Implications for the selection and counselling of students , 1983 .

[19]  P. Abrami,et al.  Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research , 1987 .

[20]  F. Coffield.  Should We Be Using Learning Styles? What Research Has to Say to Practice , 2004 .

[21]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Arnaud Durand,et al.  The Academic Ethic and College Grades: Does Hard Work Help Students to , 2000 .

[23]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education , 2002 .

[24]  Predicting Introductory Psychology Test Scores: An Engaging and Useful Topic , 1994 .

[25]  P. Ramsden.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[26]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments , 1990 .

[27]  D. Newble,et al.  Approaches to Learning of Medical Students and Practising Physicians: some empirical evidence and its implications for medical education , 1991 .

[28]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Personal understanding and target understanding: mapping influences on the outcomes of learning. , 2002, The British journal of educational psychology.

[29]  Åge Diseth,et al.  Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement , 2003 .

[30]  D. Watkins.  Correlates of approaches to learning: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. , 2001 .

[31]  D. J. Woehr,et al.  Self-Report Measures of Ability, Effort, and Nonacademic Activity as Predictors of Introductory Psychology Test Scores , 1993 .

[32]  F. Cano,et al.  Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[33]  Barbara J. Flood,et al.  Assessing the Teaching Quality of Accounting Programmes: An evaluation of the Course Experience Questionnaire , 2003 .

[34]  Michael Prosser,et al.  Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes , 1991 .

[35]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[36]  S. Messick.  Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning. Research Report RR-94-45. , 1994 .

[37]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[39]  B. Byrne.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[40]  N. Entwistle,et al.  EFFECTS OF ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS ON STUDENTS' APPROACHES TO STUDYING , 1981 .

[41]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[42]  Howard K Wachtel,et al.  Student Evaluation of College Teaching Effectiveness: a brief review , 1998 .

[43]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in electronically delivered courses , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[44]  K. Anders Ericsson,et al.  Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance , 2005 .

[45]  P. Ramsden,et al.  The development, validation and application of the Course Experience Questionnaire , 1997 .