Bacterial contamination of suction tips used during surgical procedures performed on dogs and cats.

OBJECTIVE To determine prevalence of bacterial contamination of surgical suction tips. SAMPLE POPULATION Surgical tips used during 44 surgical procedures performed on 42 dogs and 2 cats. PROCEDURE Surgical procedures were classified into 1 of 3 categories according to degree of bacterial contamination of the surgical site (clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated). Two sets of suction apparatuses were used for test and control suction tips. Test tips were used normally to suction blood and fluid, whereas control tips were placed on the surgical drapes but not in the surgical wound. Suction tips were collected aseptically and placed into thioglycolate broth tubes for qualitative aerobic and anaerobic bacterial culture at the end of each procedure. RESULTS Test and control suction tips were contaminated with bacteria during 30 of 44 (68%) procedures. Staphylococcus spp were the predominant bacteria in tips used during clean and clean-contaminated surgeries. When surgery was performed on clean-contaminated or contaminated wounds, prevalence of isolation of other bacteria such as Pseudomonas spp, Streptococcus spp, and Escherichia coli from both test and control suction tips was higher than for clean wounds. Mean time of procedures during which both test and control suction tips became contaminated was not significantly different from time of procedures during which neither tip became contaminated. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Surgical suction tips often become contaminated during standard veterinary surgical procedures. The risk of wound infection after surgery may be influenced by bacterial contamination of surgical suction tips.

[1]  P. Muir,et al.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in 11 dogs , 1999, Veterinary Record.

[2]  C. Papoutsi,et al.  Factors that influence the effectiveness of surgical gowns in the operating theatre. , 1997, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[3]  M. Conzemius,et al.  Epidemiologic evaluation of postoperative wound infections in dogs and cats. , 1997, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[4]  G. Bannister,et al.  Clothing in laminar-flow operating theatres. , 1996, The Journal of hospital infection.

[5]  J. McElwain,et al.  Intraoperative suction catheter tip contamination. , 1994, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[6]  M. Markel.  The power of a statistical test. What does insignificance mean? , 1991, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[7]  M. Miller,et al.  Wound infection rates in dogs and cats after use of cotton muslin or disposable impermeable fabric as barrier material: 720 cases (1983-1989). , 1990, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[8]  J. Romatowski.  Prevention and control of surgical wound infection. , 1989, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[9]  J. Levy,et al.  Surgical wound infection rates in dogs and cats. Data from a teaching hospital. , 1988, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[10]  C. Greenough.  An investigation into contamination of operative suction. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  F. H Howorth,et al.  PREVENTION OF AIRBORNE INFECTION DURING SURGERY , 1985, The Lancet.

[12]  A. Suzuki,et al.  Airborne contamination in an operating suite: report of a five-year survey , 1984, Journal of Hygiene.

[13]  Z. Quraishi,et al.  Movement of personnel and wound contamination. , 1983, AORN journal.

[14]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Modified oxidase and benzidine tests for separation of staphylococci from micrococci , 1981, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[15]  R. Meals,et al.  The surgical suction top--a contaminated instrument. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  D. Vesley,et al.  Bacterial dispersion in relation to operating room clothing , 1976, Journal of Hygiene.

[17]  J. Kiser,et al.  Profunda Femoris—Popliteal Shunt , 1964, Annals of surgery.