Neuroanatomical Characteristics and Speech Perception in Noise in Older Adults

Objectives: Previous research has attributed older adults' difficulty with perceiving speech in noise to peripheral hearing loss. However, recent studies have suggested a more complex picture and implicate the central nervous system in sensation and sensory deficits. This study examines the relationship between the neuroanatomical structure of cognitive brain regions and the ability to perceive speech in noise in older adults. In particular, the neuroanatomical characteristics of the left ventral and dorsal prefrontal cortex (PFC) are considered relative to standard measures of hearing in noise. Design: The participants were 15 older and 14 younger right-handed native speakers of American English who had no neurologic deficits and scored better than normal on standardized cognitive tests. We measured the participants' peripheral hearing ability and their ability to perceive speech in noise using established tests. Anatomical magnetic resonance images were taken and analyzed to extract regional volumes and thicknesses of several key neuroanatomical structures. Results: Younger adults had better hearing sensitivity and better speech perception in noise ability than older adults. For the older adults only, the volume of the left pars triangularis and the cortical thickness of the left superior frontal gyrus were significant predictors of performance on the speech in noise test. Discussion: These findings suggest that, in addition to peripheral structures, the central nervous system also contributes to the ability to perceive speech in noise. In older adults, a decline in the relative volume and cortical thickness of the PFC during aging can therefore be a factor in a declining ability to perceive speech in a naturalistic environment. These findings are consistent with the decline-compensation hypothesis, which states that a decline in sensory processing caused by cognitive aging can be accompanied by an increase in the recruitment of more general cognitive areas as a means of compensation. We found that a larger PFC volume may compensate for declining peripheral hearing. Clinically, recognizing the contribution of the cerebral cortex expands treatment possibilities for hearing loss in older adults beyond peripheral hearing aids to include strategies for improving cognitive function. We conclude by considering several mechanisms by which the PFC may facilitate speech perception in noise, including inhibitory control, attention, cross-modal compensation, word prediction and phonological working memory, although no definitive conclusion can be drawn.

[1]  F. Craik,et al.  The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[2]  T. Parrish,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  D. Salat,et al.  Greater orbital prefrontal volume selectively predicts worse working memory performance in older adults. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  A hybrid approach to the Skull Stripping problem in MRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[5]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Brain mechanisms for reading words and pseudowords: an integrated approach. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[7]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Age-related changes in cortical blood flow activation during visual processing of faces and location , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  C. Turner,et al.  Limiting spectral resolution in speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  F. Craik,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed.). , 2008 .

[11]  L E Humes,et al.  Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  Lexical retrieval constrained by sound structure: The role of the left inferior frontal gyrus , 2005, Brain and Language.

[13]  Larry E Humes,et al.  Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  M. Akeroyd Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[15]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[16]  E. Gordon,et al.  Regional White Matter and Neuropsychological Functioning across the Adult Lifespan , 2006, Biological Psychiatry.

[17]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: The effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  Robert A. Koeppe,et al.  Age Differences in Behavior and PET Activation Reveal Differences in Interference Resolution in Verbal Working Memory , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[20]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Functional MRI investigation of verbal selection mechanisms in lateral prefrontal cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[21]  Sandra Gordon-Salant,et al.  Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  N. Cowan Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[23]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: Effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[24]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Development of left occipitotemporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically- based intervention , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[25]  E. Knudsen Fundamental components of attention. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[26]  L. Humes The contributions of audibility and cognitive factors to the benefit provided by amplified speech to older adults. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[27]  Michael Petrides,et al.  Frontal lobes and behaviour , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[28]  Patrick C M Wong,et al.  Volume of left Heschl's Gyrus and linguistic pitch learning. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Patrick C. M. Wong,et al.  Integrating the message level into treatment for agrammatism using story retelling , 2004 .

[30]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Editorial: Modularity, Mass-Action and Memory , 1986 .

[31]  Adam R. Walczak,et al.  Age-related Effects on Word Recognition: Reliance on Cognitive Control Systems with Structural Declines in Speech-responsive Cortex , 2008, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[32]  R. Bentler Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[33]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images , 2004, NeuroImage.

[34]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[35]  A. Parkin,et al.  Human memory , 1999, Current Biology.

[36]  A. Dale,et al.  Thinning of the cerebral cortex in aging. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  A review of neuroimaging in obstructive sleep apnea. , 2006, Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

[38]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Relationship between hippocampal volume and memory ability in healthy individuals across the lifespan: review and meta-analysis. , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  M. Killion,et al.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[41]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[43]  Robert D Frisina,et al.  Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms , 1997, Hearing Research.

[44]  W. Kennedy,et al.  Model Building for Prediction in Regression Based Upon Repeated Significance Tests , 1971 .

[45]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Hand Actions and Speech Representation in Broca's Area , 2006, Cortex.

[46]  Faith M. Gunning-Dixon,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of selected executive functions in middle-aged and older adults: a prospective MRI study , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  G. Gates,et al.  Hearing in the elderly--the Framingham cohort, 1983-1985: Part II. Prevalence of central auditory processing disorders. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[48]  Nikos Makris,et al.  Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  Graham Naylor,et al.  Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 1. Patterns of benefit , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[50]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  A functional account of age differences in memory , 2016 .

[51]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  P. Wong,et al.  Aging and cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  Murray Grossman,et al.  Sentence Processing Strategies in Healthy Seniors with Poor Comprehension: An fMRI Study , 2002, Brain and Language.

[54]  Cheryl L. Dahle,et al.  Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  Charan Ranganath,et al.  Prefrontal Cortex and Long-Term Memory Encoding: An Integrative Review of Findings from Neuropsychology and Neuroimaging , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[56]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Task-independent and task-specific age effects on brain activity during working memory, visual attention and episodic retrieval. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  Aging and Speech-on-Speech Masking , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[58]  P. Denes On the Motor Theory of Speech Perception , 1965 .

[59]  R. Plomp A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[60]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[61]  P. Renshaw,et al.  Volumetric MRI analysis comparing subjects having attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder with normal controls , 1997, Neurology.

[62]  D. Pandya,et al.  Comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis of the human and the macaque ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and corticocortical connection patterns in the monkey , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[63]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[64]  Marianna D. Eddy,et al.  Regionally localized thinning of the cerebral cortex in schizophrenia , 2003, Schizophrenia Research.

[65]  M. Eckert,et al.  Speech Recognition in Younger and Older Adults: A Dependency on Low-Level Auditory Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[67]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  Henry Simon,et al.  Age-related alterations in the neural coding of envelope periodicities. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[69]  S. Resnick,et al.  Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies of Older Adults: A Shrinking Brain , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[70]  A. Dale,et al.  Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  Robert Burkard,et al.  Auditory Temporal Processing during Aging , 2001 .

[72]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[73]  Mead C. Killion,et al.  Erratum: “Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116(4), 2395–2405 (2004)] , 2006 .

[74]  K O Lim,et al.  A controlled study of cortical gray matter and ventricular changes in alcoholic men over a 5-year interval. , 1998, Archives of general psychiatry.

[75]  J. T. Webster,et al.  The Use of an F-Statistic in Stepwise Regression Procedures , 1972 .

[76]  J. Kramer,et al.  Brain atrophy in primary lateral sclerosis , 2009, Neurology.

[77]  Graham Naylor,et al.  Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[78]  Dana L. Wilson,et al.  Longitudinal Changes in Hearing Aid Satisfaction and Usage in the Elderly Over a Period of One or Two Years After Hearing Aid Delivery , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[79]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Relations between aging sensory/sensorimotor and cognitive functions , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[80]  Elizabeth A. Peck,et al.  Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis , 2001 .

[81]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[82]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[83]  D. Delis,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging correlates of set shifting , 2007, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[84]  L E Humes,et al.  Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: the contributions of auditory processing deficits. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[85]  A. Dale,et al.  High‐resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[86]  Christopher M. Conway,et al.  Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key , 2010, Cognition.