This paper is to be seen as describing a new theoretical framework for investigating information retrieval. For some years now, I have felt the need to describe such a framework. It is especially important if one wants to develop information retrieval beyond the mere keyword approach. In the closing pages of my earlier book on the subject I said the following: “It has never been assumed that a retrieval system should attempt to understand” the content of a document. Most Information Retrieval systems at the moment merely aim at a bibliographic search. Documents are deemed to be relevant on the basis of a superficial description. I do not suggest that it is going to be a simple matter to program a computer to understand documents. What is suggested is that some attempt should be made to construct something like a naive model, using more than just keywords, of the content of each document in the system. The more sophisticated question-answering systems do something very similar. They have a model of their universe of discourse and can answer questions about it, and can incorporate new facts and rules as they become available (van Rijsbergen, 1979).
[1]
E. W. Adams,et al.
The logic of conditionals
,
1975
.
[2]
W. Bruce Croft.
User-specified domain knowledge for document retrieval
,
1986,
SIGIR '86.
[3]
William S. Cooper,et al.
Foundations of logico-linguistics
,
1978
.
[4]
Gregory J. Chaitin,et al.
Algorithmic Information Theory
,
1987,
IBM J. Res. Dev..
[5]
David R. Dowty,et al.
Introduction to Montague semantics
,
1980
.
[6]
Anthony Appiah,et al.
Generalising the probabilistic semantics of conditionals
,
1984,
J. Philos. Log..