Regional involvement in EU trade policy: what remains after politicization?

[1]  M. H. Guimarães,et al.  Trade contestation and regional politics: The case of Belgium and Germany , 2022, Frontiers in Political Science.

[2]  Niels Gheyle.  Evading Vetoes: Exiting the Politicized Decision Trap in EU Trade Policy , 2022, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies.

[3]  P. Bursens,et al.  Seizing the moment: Regional opportunity structures and Wallonia’s temporary veto of the EU–Canada bilateral trade agreement , 2021, Regional & Federal Studies.

[4]  Jörg Broschek.  The federalization of trade politics in Switzerland, Germany and Austria , 2021, Regional & Federal Studies.

[5]  C. Freudlsperger.  The conditions and potentials of federalizing trade policy: Comparing Canada and the United States , 2021, Regional & Federal Studies.

[6]  J. Jaursch.  Regional mobilization in international trade policy: The US states in transatlantic trade negotiations , 2021, Regional & Federal Studies.

[7]  Patricia M. Goff.  The Multilevel Politics of Trade , 2020 .

[8]  C. Freudlsperger.  Trade Policy in Multilevel Government , 2020 .

[9]  A. Poletti,et al.  Towards Explaining Varying Degrees of Politicization of EU Trade Agreement Negotiations , 2020 .

[10]  C. Dupuy,et al.  Policy feedback , 2019, Dictionnaire des politiques publiques.

[11]  Francesco Duina.  Why the excitement? Values, identities, and the politicization of EU trade policy with North America , 2019, Journal of European Public Policy.

[12]  Sophie Meunier,et al.  From back rooms to the street? A research agenda for explaining variation in the public salience of trade policy-making in Europe , 2019, Journal of European Public Policy.

[13]  Niels Gheyle.  Conceptualizing the Parliamentarization and Politicization of European Policies , 2019, Politics and Governance.

[14]  C. Freudlsperger.  More voice, less exit: sub-federal resistance to international procurement liberalization in the European Union, the United States and Canada , 2018 .

[15]  Luis Bouza,et al.  From the 2005 Constitution’s ‘Permissive Consensus’ To TTIP’s ‘Empowering Dissensus’: The EU as a Playing Field for Spanish Civil Society , 2018, Journal of Contemporary European Research.

[16]  Sandra León.  Intergovernmental councils in Spain: Challenges and opportunities in a changing political context , 2017 .

[17]  M. Tatham.  With, Without, or Against the State?: How European Regions Play the Brussels Game , 2016 .

[18]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Volume I , 2016 .

[19]  C. Colino,et al.  Multilevel structures, coordination and partisan politics in Spanish intergovernmental relations , 2014 .

[20]  Anna Grzymala-Busse.  Time Will Tell? Temporality and the Analysis of Causal Mechanisms and Processes , 2011 .

[21]  Gerda. Falkner.  The EU's Decision Traps , 2011 .

[22]  L. Hooghe,et al.  The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies , 2010 .

[23]  T. Falleti,et al.  Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis , 2009 .

[24]  Joachim Blatter,et al.  In Search of Co‐variance, Causal Mechanisms or Congruence? Towards a Plural Understanding of Case Studies , 2008 .

[25]  Joachim Blatter,et al.  The Foreign Relations of European Regions: Competences and Strategies , 2008 .

[26]  Andreas Dür.  EU Trade Policy as Protection for Exporters: The Agreements With Mexico and Chile , 2007 .

[27]  P. Bursens,et al.  The European rescue of the federal state: How Europeanisation shapes the Belgian state , 2006 .

[28]  Andreas Dür,et al.  Constituency Interests and Delegation in European and American Trade Policy , 2005 .

[29]  P. Pierson.  Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis , 2004 .

[30]  A. Benz.  Föderale Demokratie , 2020 .

[31]  S. Kropp.  Kooperativer Föderalismus und Politikverflechtung , 2010 .