Looking for friends and followers: a global investigation of governmental social media use

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify governmental social media use in cities with enhanced information and communications technology infrastructures (i.e. Informational World Cities) and high Internet penetration rates. Social media platforms are increasingly being used by governments to foster user interaction and it was investigated if social media platforms are valuable tools for reaching high numbers of citizens. Design/methodology/approach – This paper is based on an iterative content and Web analysis from November 2012 till January 2013 and offers a comparison of different social media service types and the particular use. Findings – This empirical investigation of 31 Informational World Cities provides an overview of social media services used for governmental purposes, of their popularity among governments and of their usage intensity in broadcasting information online. Even as cities in a globalized world become more similar, a variety in the use of social media by governments was d...

[1]  Wolfgang G. Stock.  Informational cities: Analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Jesse M. Shapiro.  Smart Cities: Quality of Life, Productivity, and the Growth Effects of Human Capital , 2005, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[3]  M. J. Moon.  The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[4]  J. Grimes,et al.  Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e‐government , 2012 .

[5]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[6]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[7]  Qi Zhang,et al.  New development: Fiscal transparency in China—government policy and the role of social media , 2013 .

[8]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[9]  W. Eggers.  Government 2.0: Using Technology to Improve Education, Cut Red Tape, Reduce Gridlock, and Enhance Democracy , 2004 .

[10]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Participative Public Policy Making Through Multiple Social Media Platforms Utilization , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[11]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Encouraging Citizen Adoption of eGovernment by Building Trust , 2002, Electron. Mark..

[12]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[13]  Bert-Jaap Koops,et al.  Government 2.0: key challenges to its realization , 2012 .

[14]  D. Norris,et al.  Local E‐Government in the United States: Transformation or Incremental Change? , 2013 .

[15]  Peter Dahlgren,et al.  Social Media and Counter-Democracy: The Contingences of Participation , 2012, ePart.

[16]  Jan Nolin,et al.  Disciplining social media: An analysis of social media policies in 26 Swedish municipalities , 2011, First Monday.

[17]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Carmen Caba-Pérez,et al.  A vision of social media in the Spanish smartest cities , 2014 .

[19]  David H. Coursey,et al.  Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment , 2008 .

[20]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems? , 2011, ePart.

[21]  Ines Mergel,et al.  A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Michael Gisler.  Electronic Government—mehr als eine Website , 2001 .

[23]  David J. Faulds,et al.  Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix , 2009 .

[24]  Yonghong Wu,et al.  Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Nick Ellison,et al.  Social Media and Local Government: Citizenship, Consumption and Democracy , 2014 .

[26]  P. Candace Deans,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL MEDIA TRENDS IN CHINA , 2011 .

[27]  Thomas Skirbunt,et al.  Government outreach to the U.S. Spanish-speaking community uses social media , 2009, D.GO.

[28]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Government innovation through social media , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[29]  Nick Ellison,et al.  DEVELOPING POLITICAL CONVERSATIONS? , 2013 .

[30]  Krishnamurthy Sriramesh,et al.  E-government in a corporatist, communitarian society: the case of Singapore , 2006, New Media Soc..

[31]  Neil Leach,et al.  The Informational City , 2015 .

[32]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[33]  Wolfgang G. Stock,et al.  Government and Social Media: A Case Study of 31 Informational World Cities , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  Lynda L. McGhie,et al.  World Wide Web , 2011, Encyclopedia of Information Assurance.