Combining driving simulator and physiological sensor data in a latent variable model to incorporate the effect of stress in car-following behaviour

Abstract Car-following models, which are used to predict the acceleration-deceleration decisions of drivers in the presence of a closely spaced lead vehicle, are critical components of traffic microsimulation tools and useful for safety evaluation. Existing car-following models primarily account for the effects of surrounding traffic conditions on a driver’s decision to accelerate or decelerate. However, research in human factors and safety has demonstrated that driving decisions are also significantly affected by individuals’ characteristics and their emotional states like stress, fatigue, etc. This motivates us to develop a car-following model where we explicitly account for the stress level of the driver and quantify its impact on acceleration-deceleration decisions. An extension of the GM stimulus-response model framework is proposed in this regard, where stress is treated as a latent (unobserved) variable, while the specification also accounts for the effects of drivers’ sociodemographic characteristics. The proposed hybrid models are calibrated using data collected with the University of Leeds Driving Simulator where participants are deliberately subjected to stress in the form of aggressive surrounding vehicles, slow leaders and/or time pressure while driving in a motorway setting. Alongside commonly used variables, physiological measures of stress (i.e. heart rate, blood volume pulse, skin conductance) are collected with a non-intrusive wristband. These measurements are used as indicators of the latent stress level in a hybrid model framework and the model parameters are estimated using Maximum Likelihood Technique. Estimation results indicate that car-following behaviour is significantly influenced by stress alongside speed, headway and drivers’ characteristics. The findings can be used to improve the fidelity of simulation tools and designing interventions to improve safety.

[1]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Quantitative analysis of wrist electrodermal activity during sleep. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[2]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Driver stress as influenced by driving maneuvers and roadway conditions , 2007 .

[3]  R. Fuller Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Unobserved heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data , 2016 .

[5]  Martin Treiber,et al.  Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation , 2012 .

[6]  F. Mannering Temporal instability and the analysis of highway accident data , 2018 .

[7]  Rongfang Liu,et al.  DRACULA: DYNAMIC ROUTE ASSIGNMENT COMBINING USER LEARNING AND MICRO-SIMULATION , 1995 .

[8]  Peter A. Hancock Is car following the real question – are equations the answer? , 1999 .

[9]  Alexandra Kondyli,et al.  Assessment of car-following models by driver type and under different traffic, weather conditions using data from an instrumented vehicle , 2014, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[10]  Martin L. Griss,et al.  Activity-Aware Mental Stress Detection Using Physiological Sensors , 2010, MobiCASE.

[11]  Samer H. Hamdar Driver Behavior Modeling , 2012 .

[12]  Ajay K. Rathi,et al.  Urban Network Traffic Simulation:TRAF-NETSIM Program , 1990 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[14]  G. Matthews,et al.  DIMENSIONS OF DRIVER STRESS , 1989 .

[15]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Modelling the loss and retention of contacts in social networks: The role of dyad-level heterogeneity and tie strength , 2018, Journal of Choice Modelling.

[16]  GedeonTom,et al.  Objective measures, sensors and computational techniques for stress recognition and classification , 2012 .

[17]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Modeling Acceleration Decisions for Freeway Merges , 2009 .

[18]  Yi Zhu,et al.  SimMobility: A Multi-scale Integrated Agent-Based Simulation Platform , 2016 .

[19]  Philipp Yorck Herzberg,et al.  Beyond “accident-proneness”: Using Five-Factor Model prototypes to predict driving behavior , 2009 .

[20]  Samer H. Hamdar,et al.  From behavioral psychology to acceleration modeling: Calibration, validation, and exploration of drivers’ cognitive and safety parameters in a risk-taking environment , 2014, 1403.4980.

[21]  Peter Bonsall,et al.  Modelling safety-related driving behaviour: impact of parameter values , 2005 .

[22]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[23]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Recovery of inter- and intra-personal heterogeneity using mixed logit models , 2011 .

[24]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  Incorporating human-factors in car-following models : a review of recent developments and research needs , 2014 .

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[26]  Danping Liu,et al.  Assessing Risk-Taking in a Driving Simulator Study: Modeling Longitudinal Semi-Continuous Driving Data Using a Two-Part Regression Model with Correlated Random Effects. , 2015, Analytic methods in accident research.

[27]  W. V. Winsum THE HUMAN ELEMENT IN CAR FOLLOWING MODELS , 1999 .

[28]  Simon Washington,et al.  Revisiting the Task-Capability interface model for incorporating human factors into car-following models , 2015 .

[29]  D. Hennessy,et al.  Traffic congestion, driver stress, and driver aggression , 1999 .

[30]  Shlomo Bekhor,et al.  A passing gap acceptance model for two-lane rural highways , 2009 .

[31]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Driver behaviour and traffic modelling. Are we looking at the right issues? , 2003, IEEE IV2003 Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8683).

[32]  Tamás D. Gedeon,et al.  Objective measures, sensors and computational techniques for stress recognition and classification: A survey , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[33]  Mazen Danaf,et al.  Modeling anger and aggressive driving behavior in a dynamic choice-latent variable model. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Marissa A. Gorlick,et al.  To Brake or Accelerate When the Light Turns Yellow? , 2009, Psychological science.

[35]  Winnie Daamen,et al.  Key Variables of Merging Behaviour: Empirical Comparison between Two Sites and Assessment of Gap Acceptance Theory , 2013 .

[36]  Jennifer Healey,et al.  Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[37]  Grigorios Fountas,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of discrete outcome and continuous dependent variable equations: A bivariate random effects modeling approach with unrestricted instruments , 2017 .

[38]  Syed Waqar Jaffry,et al.  Modeling of individual differences in car-following behaviour of drivers , 2017, 2017 International Multi-topic Conference (INMIC).

[39]  Armando Barreto,et al.  Stress Recognition Using Non-invasive Technology , 2006, FLAIRS.

[40]  T. Chau,et al.  Comparison of blood volume pulse and skin conductance responses to mental and affective stimuli at different anatomical sites , 2011, Physiological measurement.

[41]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Heterogeneity In Car-Following Behavior: Theory And Empirics , 2011 .

[42]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Mental Workload, Longitudinal Driving Behavior, and Adequacy of Car-Following Models for Incidents in Other Driving Lane , 2010 .

[43]  Jennifer Healey,et al.  Toward Machine Emotional Intelligence: Analysis of Affective Physiological State , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[44]  K. Ahmed Modeling drivers' acceleration and lane changing behavior , 1999 .

[45]  Jasper Laagland How To Model Aggressive Behavior In Traffic simulation , 2005 .

[46]  Konstantina Gkritza,et al.  Modeling Driver Behavior in Dilemma Zones: A Discrete/Continuous Formulation with Selectivity Bias Corrections , 2014 .

[47]  J Törnros,et al.  Effect of driving speed on reaction time during motorway driving. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[48]  Nima Golshani,et al.  Grouped random parameters bivariate probit analysis of perceived and observed aggressive driving behavior: A driving simulation study , 2017 .

[49]  D. Gazis,et al.  Nonlinear Follow-the-Leader Models of Traffic Flow , 1961 .

[50]  Christos D. Katsis,et al.  An integrated system based on physiological signals for the assessment of affective states in patients with anxiety disorders , 2011, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[51]  Tomer Toledo,et al.  Driving Behaviour: Models and Challenges , 2007 .

[52]  Samer H. Hamdar,et al.  Modeling Driver Behavior as Sequential Risk-Taking Task , 2008 .

[53]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Integrated driving behavior modeling , 2007 .

[54]  I. Norros,et al.  The Palm distribution of traffic conditions and its application to accident risk assessment , 2016 .

[55]  J. W. C. van Lint,et al.  A generic multi-level framework for microscopic traffic simulation—Theory and an example case in modelling driver distraction , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[56]  Penousal Machado,et al.  Simulating the Impact of Drivers ’ Personality on City Transit , 2013 .

[57]  Andyka Kusuma,et al.  Modelling driving behaviour at motorway weaving sections , 2015 .

[58]  Daniel McDuff,et al.  AutoEmotive: bringing empathy to the driving experience to manage stress , 2014, DIS Companion '14.

[59]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The effect of speed limits on drivers' choice of speed: A random parameters seemingly unrelated equations approach , 2016 .

[60]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Do cooperative systems make drivers' car-following behavior safer? , 2014 .

[61]  Ikki Kim,et al.  Identifying driver heterogeneity in car-following based on a random coefficient model , 2013 .

[62]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Intra-respondent Heterogeneity in a Stated Choice Survey on Wetland Conservation in Belarus: First Steps Towards Creating a Link with Uncertainty in Contingent Valuation , 2015 .

[63]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Car-Following Behavior Analysis from Microscopic Trajectory Data , 2005 .

[64]  D. Haigney,et al.  Individual differences in driver stress, error and violation , 2000 .

[65]  M. Benedek,et al.  A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[66]  Abdullah Bin Queyam,et al.  A Novel Method of Stress Detection using Physiological Measurements of Automobile Drivers , 2013 .

[67]  Gennaro Nicola Bifulco,et al.  Heterogeneity of Driving Behaviors in Different Car-Following Conditions , 2016 .

[68]  Jack Demick,et al.  Relations Among Personality Traits, Mood States, and Driving Behaviors , 2001 .

[69]  Charisma F. Choudhury,et al.  Transferability of Car-Following Models Between Driving Simulator and Field Traffic , 2017 .