Assimilating information technology innovations: strategies and moderating influences

This paper examines the process of new technology assimilation with an objective of understanding what specific organizational strategies facilitate the assimilation process. A four-cell conceptual framework is synthesized from prior research, which differentiates between two units of analysis responsible for assimilation-an individual or the organization. Depending on the specific location of an organization and a technology within this framework, as well as the desired location, a few "generic" assimilation strategies are described that allow an organization to move from one cell of the framework to another by influencing individual adoption behaviors. Recognizing that the outcomes of assimilation strategies are influenced by key moderating influences-such as the differences in the technology that is being assimilated, the characteristics of target adopters, and their perceptions toward that technology-prior research is again reviewed to study the impact of these moderating variables. The assimilation strategies, together with the effects of moderating variables, constitute a model of innovation assimilation. Adopting a process orientation, the model is used to perform a retrospective analysis of the efforts of nine major corporations as they attempted to assimilate new information technologies into their operations. The analyses yield a contingency framework for the choice of assimilation strategy that can be used as a guide for management action.

[1]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  An evaluation of an innovative information technology - the case of Carrier EXPERT , 1995, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[2]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[3]  William D. Perreault,et al.  A Conceptual Paradigm and Approach for the Study of Innovators , 1981 .

[4]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation , 1977 .

[5]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[6]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[7]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  R. Zmud Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization , 1982 .

[9]  Mohan Tanniru,et al.  Knowledge-based GDSS to support reciprocally interdependent decisions , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[11]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Effectiveness of External Information Channels in Facilitating Innovation Within Software Development Groups , 1983, MIS Q..

[12]  P. Attewell Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[13]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[14]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[15]  R. Zmud An Examination of Push-Pull Theory Applied to Process Innovation in Knowledge Work , 1984 .

[16]  Malcolm Munro,et al.  Information Technology Assessment and Adoption: A Field Study , 1985, MIS Q..

[17]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Attitudes and Management Information System Use , 1979 .

[18]  V. A. Thompson Bureaucracy and innovation , 1969 .

[19]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of a Convergence in Understanding Between Technology Providers and Users on Information Technology Innovativeness , 1991 .

[20]  R. Frambach An Integrated Model of Organizational Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations , 1993 .

[21]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Assessing the impact of expert systems: The experiences of a small firm , 1994 .

[22]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[23]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  Concepts, Theory, and Techniques: FACTORS AFFECTING THE PERCEIVED UTILIZATION OF COMPUTER-BASED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS IN THE OIL INDUSTRY , 1982 .

[24]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[25]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[26]  Michael Albers,et al.  The practice of business process reengineering: radical planning and incremental implementation in an IS organization , 1994, SIGCPR '94.

[27]  Jr. Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Performance and the Use of an Information System , 1975 .

[28]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2017 .

[29]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Dorothy Leon Ard-Barton Implementation Characteristics of Organizational Innovations , 1988 .

[31]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects , 1989 .