Adoption of Computer Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques (CAATTs) by Internal Auditors: Current issues in the UK

Adoption of Computer Assisted Audit Techniques and Tools (CAATTs) has not only become a beneficial choice for some businesses, but has become a fundamental part of many audit methodologies. (CICA, 1994; Progrob, Isenberg, 1999; Paukowits, 2000; Hudson, 1998). However, little is known about the adoption process for these tools. This research posits that further knowledge about the motivations for successful adoption of CAATTs may be contained in general literature on IT adoption activity. It also argues this could be usefully supplemented to address wider implementation and operational issues by better understanding of existing practices of internal audit departments who use CAATTs extensively to illustrate best practice in this field that others could benefit from. This paper therefore reviews, then makes use of, current theories that are seeking to better understand IT adoption processes (in particular, the most recent unified theory called the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology - UTAUT) and explores the application of this theory to the specialized domain of CAATTs adoption for internal audit. This is undertaken initially using a survey instrument to collect quantitative data on the potential applicability of this theory. Building on the results of this survey, a series of ten mini-case studies is then used to add qualitative depth to the survey results. Using a combination of these two approaches, a model of successful CAATTs adoption by internal auditors is then proposed. This resulting model is comprised of four dimensions covering the issues of; factors influencing motivation, best practices of implementation, performance measurement criteria and challenges that can become barriers to successful implementation. This paper details the theoretical foundations used for the development of this model, details the empirics used to explore the motivational theory for adoption, presents the resulting model and illustrates the validation performed on the model.

[1]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Investigating the Research Approaches for Examining Technology Adoption Issues , 2005 .

[2]  Frank Paukowits,et al.  Bridging CAATs and Risk , 2000 .

[3]  Melvin M. Mark,et al.  Alternative models for the use of multiple methods , 1987 .

[4]  Leslie Woods,et al.  Qualitative data analysis - explorations with NVivo G Gibbs Qualitative data analysis - explorations with nvivo open university press no of pages: 257 £19.99 0335200842 0335200842. , 2002, Nurse researcher.

[5]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2002 .

[6]  Rick Elam,et al.  Continuous Auditing: Building Automated Auditing Capability , 2002 .

[7]  James G. Anderson,et al.  Clearing the way for physicians' use of clinical information systems , 1997, CACM.

[8]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[9]  Jean C. Bedard,et al.  The effect of training on auditors' acceptance of an electronic work system , 2003, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Michael Sherer,et al.  Audit automation as control within audit firms , 2001 .

[11]  Gultekin Özsoyoglu,et al.  Auditing for secure statistical databases , 1981, ACM '81.

[12]  Jay C. Thibodeau,et al.  The impact of information technology on the audit process: an assessment of the state of the art and implications for the future , 2001 .

[13]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[14]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Stuart Manson,et al.  Audit Automation in the UK and the Us: A Comparative Study , 1998 .

[16]  Roger Debreceny,et al.  Employing generalized audit software in the financial services sector: Challenges and opportunities , 2005 .

[17]  Robert L. Braun,et al.  Computer‐assisted audit tools and techniques: analysis and perspectives , 2003 .

[18]  R. Elliott,et al.  Twenty-First Century Assurance , 2002 .

[19]  Zhiping Walter,et al.  Theory of user acceptance of information technologies: an examination of health care professionals , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[20]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[21]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Mary B. Curtis,et al.  An examination of contextual factors and individual characteristics affecting technology implementation decisions in auditing , 2008, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Roger Debreceny,et al.  The Development of Embedded Audit Modules to Support Continuous Monitoring in the Electronic Commerce Environment , 2003 .

[24]  Anish Bhimani,et al.  Securing the commercial Internet , 1996, CACM.

[25]  K. Johnstone Client-Acceptance Decisions: Simultaneous Effects of Client Business Risk, Audit Risk, Auditor Business Risk, and Risk Adaptation , 2006 .

[26]  S. Kvale Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[27]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[28]  Tommie Singleton,et al.  A 25‐year retrospective on the IIA’s SAC projects , 2003 .

[29]  H. J. Will,et al.  Acl: Audit Command Language , 1975 .

[30]  Roger S. Debreceny,et al.  Embedded Audit Modules in Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Implementation and Functionality , 2005, J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Timothy B. Bell,et al.  Auditing organizations through a strategic-systems lens : the KPMG Business Measurement Process , 1997 .

[32]  A. Rashad Abdel-Khalik,et al.  The Effects of Certain Internal Audit Variables on the Planning of External Audit Programs , 1983 .

[33]  Marcia L. Weidenmier,et al.  CHAPTER 9 THE PERVASIVE IMPACT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON INTERNAL AUDITING , 2004 .

[34]  Sonja Wiley-Patton,et al.  Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[35]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  C. Janie Chang,et al.  The Impact of Retention Incentives and Client Business Risks on Auditors' Decisions Involving Aggressive Reporting Practices , 2003 .

[37]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..