Flow exchanges in multi-reservoir systems with spillbacks

Abstract Large-scale traffic flow models based on the Network Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram (MFD) are usually grounded on the bathtub analogy and a conservation equation for vehicle accumulation inside a given urban area. Recent studies have proposed a different approach where the MFD defines the spatial mean speed that is shared by all vehicles in a region while their traveling distance is tracked individually. The former approach is also referred to as “accumulation-based” while the latter is usually named “trip-based”. While extensive studies of both model properties have been carried out for the single reservoir case (a unique region), the multi-reservoir setting still requires some research effort in particular to clearly understand how inflow merge at a reservoir entry and outflow diverge at exit should be managed. These two components play a significant role in the evolution of the whole system, when flows are exchanged between multiple reservoirs. One of the crucial questions is to ensure that congestion properly propagates backwards through a succession of reservoirs when oversaturated situations are observed. In this paper, we propose a thorough analysis of how to handle congestion propagation in the accumulation-based framework with several trip lengths or categories, e.g. internal and external trips. This allows to derive a congestion propagation model for the trip-based approach in a multi-reservoir setting. Based on theoretical considerations and simulation studies, we develop a consistent framework to restrict the inflow and adapt to oversaturated traffic conditions in a reservoir including several trip lengths. Two inflow merging schemes are investigated. The first one is inspired from the existing literature and shares the available supply based on the demand flow ratio at the entry boundary. It is called “exogeneous” in contrast to the second “endogenous” scheme, which shares the supply with respect to the internal accumulation ratio on the different routes. At the reservoir exit, a new outflow diverging scheme is also introduced to better reproduce the effect of queuing vehicles that are prevented from exiting the reservoir when congestion spills back from neighboring reservoirs. Compared to the conventional outflow model, our new approach proves to avoid unrealistic gridlocks when the reservoir becomes oversaturated. Both entry and exit flow models are investigated in details considering the accumulation-based and trip-based frameworks. Finally, the most consistent approach is compared with two other existing MFD models for multiple reservoirs. This demonstrates the importance of properly handling entry and exit flows at boundaries.

[1]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Macroscopic modeling of traffic in cities , 2007 .

[2]  C. Daganzo THE CELL TRANSMISSION MODEL.. , 1994 .

[3]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Distance-dependent congestion pricing for downtown zones , 2015 .

[4]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Dynamics of heterogeneity in urban networks: aggregated traffic modeling and hierarchical control , 2015 .

[5]  Jack Haddad,et al.  Adaptive perimeter traffic control of urban road networks based on MFD model with time delays , 2016 .

[6]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Equilibrium analysis and route guidance in large-scale networks with MFD dynamics , 2015 .

[7]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Estimation of regional trip length distributions for the calibration of the aggregated network traffic models , 2019, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[8]  G. F. Newell A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part II: Queueing at freeway bottlenecks , 1993 .

[9]  Jin Cao,et al.  System dynamics of urban traffic based on its parking-related-states , 2015 .

[10]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  The morning commute in urban areas with heterogeneous trip lengths , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[11]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Economic Model Predictive Control of Large-Scale Urban Road Networks via Perimeter Control and Regional Route Guidance , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[12]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Meso Lighthill-Whitham and Richards Model Designed for Network Applications , 2012 .

[13]  N. Geroliminis,et al.  Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings - eScholarship , 2007 .

[14]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  THE CELL TRANSMISSION MODEL, PART II: NETWORK TRAFFIC , 1995 .

[15]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Perimeter and boundary flow control in multi-reservoir heterogeneous networks , 2013 .

[16]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Enhancing model-based feedback perimeter control with data-driven online adaptive optimization , 2017 .

[17]  Bart De Schutter,et al.  Optimal dynamic route guidance: A model predictive approach using the macroscopic fundamental diagram , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[18]  J D Littler,et al.  A PROOF OF THE QUEUING FORMULA , 1961 .

[19]  H. M. Zhang,et al.  On the distribution schemes for determining flows through a merge , 2003 .

[20]  N. Geroliminis Dynamics of Peak Hour and Effect of Parking for Congested Cities , 2009 .

[21]  Richard Arnott,et al.  A Bathtub Model of Downtown Traffic Congestion , 2013 .

[22]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Minimal Parameter Formulations of the Dynamic User Equilibrium using Macroscopic Urban Models: Freeway vs City Streets Revisited , 2017 .

[23]  Jack Haddad Robust Constrained Control of Uncertain Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram Networks , 2015 .

[24]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Hierarchical control of heterogeneous large-scale urban road networks via path assignment and regional route guidance , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[25]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Dynamic macroscopic simulation of on-street parking search: A trip-based approach , 2017 .

[26]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Approximating Dynamic Equilibrium Conditions with Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams , 2014 .

[27]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Modeling and optimization of multimodal urban networks with limited parking and dynamic pricing , 2015 .

[28]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Exploiting the fundamental diagram of urban networks for feedback-based gating , 2012 .

[29]  Fang Guo,et al.  Traffic guidance–perimeter control coupled method for the congestion in a macro network , 2017 .

[30]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Urban Gridlock: Macroscopic Modeling and Mitigation Approaches , 2007 .

[31]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Macroscopic modelling and robust control of bi-modal multi-region urban road networks , 2017 .

[32]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Macroscopic Traffic Dynamics with Heterogeneous Route Patterns , 2015 .

[33]  Jorge A. Laval,et al.  Macroscopic urban dynamics: Analytical and numerical comparisons of existing models , 2017 .

[34]  Rong Su,et al.  Region-based dynamic forecast routing for autonomous vehicles , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[35]  Jack Haddad,et al.  Coordinated distributed adaptive perimeter control for large-scale urban road networks , 2017 .

[36]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Network transmission model: A dynamic traffic model at network level (poster) , 2014 .

[37]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Cruising-for-parking in congested cities with an MFD representation , 2015 .