Instrument mediated activity: from subject development to anthropocentric design

The aim of this article is to present the ‘instrument-mediated activity’ approach, which is part of a ‘generative model’. A group of principles liable to contribute to the epistemological unity of generative models is put forward as well as a theoretical framework that conceptualizes what an instrument is for the subject. The article develops the idea that the instrument is a mixed entity born of both the subject and the artifact. The artifact is not an instrument in itself. It is the subject who grants it the status of a means for his/her action. Processes of design in usage by users are defined as ‘instrumental geneses’. Finally, the consequences of this model on the organization of design processes are examined, in taking into account instrumental geneses as resources for design.

[1]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  From Human Factors to Human Actors , 2007 .

[2]  Corinne Gaudart,et al.  A quel homme le travail doit-il être adapté ? , 2006 .

[3]  G Bendy,et al.  Meaning and sense in activity theory and their role in study of human performance , 2004 .

[4]  Viviane Folcher,et al.  Appropriating artifacts as instruments: when design-for-use meets design-in-use , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[5]  Pierre Rabardel,et al.  From artefact to instrument , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[6]  Pascal Béguin,et al.  Design as a mutual learning process between users and designers , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[7]  J Rasmussen,et al.  Human factors in a dynamic information society: where are we heading? , 2000, Ergonomics.

[8]  J M Hoc,et al.  From human – machine interaction to human – machine cooperation , 2000, Ergonomics.

[9]  Pascal Béguin,et al.  Designing for Instrument-Mediated Activity , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Design for Learning in Use , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[12]  M. P. Hollier,et al.  People and Technology , 1999 .

[13]  J. Wertsch.  Mind as action , 1998 .

[14]  David Meister,et al.  Performance Measurement : Current Perspectives and Future Challenges , 2006 .

[15]  R. Rieber,et al.  The Instrumental Method in Psychology , 1997 .

[16]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1997 .

[17]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[18]  Vladimir P. Zinchenko.  Developing activity theory: the zone of proximal development and beyond , 1995 .

[19]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Computer-mediated activity: functional organs in social and developmental contexts , 1995 .

[20]  Alain Wisner,et al.  Understanding problem building: ergonomic work analysis , 1995 .

[21]  Pierre Vérillon,et al.  Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of though in relation to instrumented activity , 1995 .

[22]  P. Rabardel.  Les hommes et les technologies; approche cognitive des instruments contemporains , 1995 .

[23]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[24]  M. Cole.  Sociocultural studies of mind: Socio-cultural-historical psychology: some general remarks and a proposal for a new kind of culturalgenetic methodology , 1995 .

[25]  Gilbert de Terssac,et al.  Autonomie dans le travail , 1994 .

[26]  Vicki S. Napper.  Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems, Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (Eds.). The book, Design at Work: Cooperative design of computer systems, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991, (ISBN 0-8058-611-3) is available in hardback ($49.95) and paperback ($29.95) , 1994 .

[27]  Bernard Conein,et al.  La connaissance distribuée dans le diagnostic médical , 1994 .

[28]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[29]  Mike Robinson,et al.  Design for Unanticipated Use , 1993, ECSCW.

[30]  K. Beach.  Becoming a bartender: the role of external memory cues in a work-directed educational activity , 1993 .

[31]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .

[32]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[33]  Austin Henderson,et al.  A development perspective on interface, design, and theory , 1991 .

[34]  P. Rabardel,et al.  Activity with a training robot and the formation of knowledge , 1991 .

[35]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface , 1991 .

[36]  David Woods,et al.  Cognitive consequences of clumsy automation on high workload, high consequence human performance , 1991 .

[37]  M. Cole.  Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline? , 1996, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[38]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Beyond the Interface: Encountering Artifacts in Use , 1989 .

[39]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  A Human Activity Approach to User Interfaces , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[40]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Work-oriented design of computer artifacts , 1989 .

[41]  J. Lave.  Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[42]  J. Lave.  Cognition in practice , 1988 .

[43]  T. W. Malone,et al.  The information lens: an intelligent system for information sharing in organizations , 2011, CHI '86.

[44]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Practical intelligence : nature and origins of competence in the everyday world , 1986 .

[45]  American Educational Research Aassociation , 1985 .

[46]  K. Popper,et al.  La connaissance objective , 1982 .

[47]  J M Faverge,et al.  [The operator's reliability and safety in industry]. , 1970 .

[48]  Jean Piaget,et al.  Épistémologie Mathématique Et Psychologie Essai Sur les Relations Entre la Logique Formelle Et Al Pensée Réelle , 1961 .

[49]  J. Faverge.  L’analyse du travail , 1956, Bulletin de psychologie.