A force plate based method for the calibration of force/torque sensors.

This study describes a novel calibration method for six-degrees-of-freedom force/torque sensors (FTsensors) using a pre-calibrated force plate (FP) as a reference measuring device. In this calibration method, the FTsensor is rigidly connected to a FP and force/torque data are synchronously recorded while a dynamic functional loading procedure is applied by the researcher. Based on these data an accurate calibration matrix for the FTsensor can easily be obtained via least-squares optimization. Using this calibration method, this study further investigated what loading methods are appropriate for the calibration of FTsensors intended for ambulatory measurement of ground reaction forces (GRFs). Seven different loading methods were compared (e.g., walking, pushing while standing on the FTsensor). Calibration matrices were calculated based on the raw data from the seven loading methods individually and all loading methods combined. Performance of these calibration matrices was subsequently compared in an in situ trial. During the in situ trial, five common work tasks (e.g., walking, manual lifting, pushing) were performed by an experimenter, while standing on the FP wearing a "ForceShoe" with two calibrated FTsensors attached to its sole. Root-mean-square differences (RMSDs) between the FTsensor and FP outcomes were calculated over all tasks. Using the calibration matrices based on all loading methods combined resulted in small RMSDs (GRF: <8 N, center of pressure: <2 mm). Using the calibration matrices based on "pushing against manual resistance" resulted in similar RMSDs, proving it to be the best single loading method.

[1]  H B Schmiedmayer,et al.  Enhancements in the accuracy of the center of pressure (COP) determined with piezoelectric force plates are dependent on the load distribution. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  P. Veltink,et al.  Evaluation of instrumented shoes for ambulatory assessment of ground reaction forces. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[3]  Jack T Dennerlein,et al.  Biomechanical loading on the upper extremity increases from single key tapping to directional tapping. , 2011, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[4]  M. Bobbert,et al.  Accuracy of determining the point of force application with piezoelectric force plates. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Ambulatory Assessment of Ankle and Foot Dynamics , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Cleve B. Moler,et al.  5. Least Squares , 2004 .

[7]  H B Schmiedmayer,et al.  Parameters influencing the accuracy of the point of force application determined with piezoelectric force plates. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Gert S. Faber,et al.  Cart pushing: The effects of magnitude and direction of the exerted push force, and of trunk inclination on low back loading , 2007 .

[9]  Nachiappan Chockalingam,et al.  Do strain gauge force platforms need in situ correction? , 2002, Gait & posture.

[10]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Determination of joint moments with instrumented force shoes in a variety of tasks. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  P. Veltink,et al.  Ambulatory measurement of ground reaction forces , 2005 .