Morphometric Examination of the Proximal Femur in the Hip Joint

Femur (uyluk kemigi), kalca ve diz arasinda bulunur. Vucudun en agir, en uzun ve en guclu kemigidir. Yas ilerledikce osteoporoz gelismekte ve proksimal femur kiriklari gorulebilmektedir. Gunumuzde kalca kiriklari cok gorulen vakalar arasindadir. Bolgeye yonelik cerrahi girisimler oldukca fazladir. Calismamizda kuru kemik uzerinde caliper ile olcum yapilmis olup proksimal femur morfometrisi sekiz parametrede incelenmistir. Caput femoris capi sag femurlarda ortalama 42.75±6.14 mm, sol femurlarda ortalama 43.83±4.03 mm olarak bulundu. Linea intertrochanterica uzunlugu sag femurlarda ortalama 56.78±5.22 mm, sol femurlarda ortalama 57.65±9.97 mm olarak olculdu. Sonuclar literaturle benzerlik tasimaktadir. Yapilan diger calismalarda proksimal femur ile ilgili bazi parametrelerin standaizasyonu olmadigi goruldu. Calismamizin kuru kemik calismalarinda elde edilen degerlerin standarize edilmesinsde onemli katkisi olacagi dusuncesindeyiz. Ayrica proksimal femura yapilacak cerrahi girisimlerde caput femoris capi ve collum femoris uzunlugu onemli parametrelerdir. Ozellikle collum femorisin uzunlugu bolgede gerceklesecek olan cerrahi mudahalede femoral artroplasti aparatinin tasarimi, boyutu ve tipi ile direk iliskilidir. Bu bakimdan literature katki saglayacagi kanisindayiz.

[1]  S. Yilmaz,et al.  HUMERUS KEMİĞİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ANATOMİK YAPILARIN MORFOMETRİK OLARAK İNCELENMESİ , 2020 .

[2]  S. Yılmaz,et al.  Morphometric Measurements on Lumbal Vertebras and Its Importance , 2020 .

[3]  S. Doğan,et al.  Morphometric Investigation of the Sacral Bone in MR Images , 2019, Journal of US-China Medical Science.

[4]  Young Lu,et al.  Hip Fractures: Relevant Anatomy, Classification, and Biomechanics of Fracture and Fixation , 2019, Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation.

[5]  Raymond A. Jean,et al.  Recurrent Falls Among Elderly Patients and the Impact of Anticoagulation Therapy , 2018, World Journal of Surgery.

[6]  P. Srivastava,et al.  Morphometry of Proximal Femur in Indian Population. , 2017, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[7]  N. Acer,et al.  Examination of ınclinations in spine at childhood and adolescence stage. , 2015, Folia morphologica.

[8]  A. Konnopka,et al.  The health burden and costs of incident fractures attributable to osteoporosis from 2010 to 2050 in Germany—a demographic simulation model , 2013, Osteoporosis International.

[9]  H. Johansson,et al.  Incidence of hip fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis in Turkey: the FRACTURK study , 2012, Osteoporosis International.

[10]  J. Lotz,et al.  Relationship Between Femoral Head Size and Distance to Lesser Trochanter , 2007, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[11]  J. D. De Guise,et al.  3D reconstruction of the proximal femur with low-dose digital stereoradiography , 2004, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[12]  S. Doğan,et al.  The calculation of the femoral condyle cartilage volume and surface area in patients with osteoarthritis , 2020 .

[13]  D. Patat,et al.  Analysis of Average Index Values of Mandible , 2019, Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation.

[14]  M. Alpaslan,et al.  [Osteometry of the femora in Turkish individuals: a morphometric study in 114 cadaveric femora as an anatomic basis of femoral component design]. , 2007, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[15]  R. Aspden,et al.  A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[16]  B. Isaac,et al.  Prediction of the femoral neck‐shaft angle from the length of the femoral neck , 1997, Clinical anatomy.

[17]  F. Hoaglund,et al.  Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.