Politics and power in training and learning: The rise and fall of the NHS university

This article examines the political processes surrounding the development and demise of an ambitious, yet short-lived, policy-based learning initiative, namely a university for the UK National Health Service. Using a Weberian framework of political action, we explore the impact of intra-organizational and macro-political dynamics on the initiative, highlighting the role of legitimate power and authority on learning within this organization. Through analysis of the practical and symbolic implications of the commitment to ‘become a university’, we identify sources of organizational resistance to the model of learning that the initiative promoted. Finally, we trace the traditional and rational-legal political processes whereby the initiative was dissolved by undermining the charismatic authority on which it was founded. We conclude by considering the wider implications of our analysis for understanding structures of authority in learning.

[1]  Russell Craig,et al.  Scholarship in university business schools – Cardinal Newman, creeping corporatism and farewell to the “disturber of the peace”? , 1999 .

[2]  Andrew Street,et al.  Organisational behaviour and organisational studies in health care , 2001 .

[3]  J. Galliher.  The protection of human subjects: a reexamination of the professional code of ethics. , 1973, The American sociologist.

[4]  J. Ferdinand.  Power, Politics and State Intervention in Organizational Learning , 2004 .

[5]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  The New Public Management in Action , 1996 .

[6]  Anders Örtenblad,et al.  Against Learning , 2003 .

[7]  Krešimir Petković.  Interpretive Policy Analysis , 2007 .

[8]  Raymond L. M. Lee.  The re-enchantment of the self: western spirituality, Asian materialism , 2003 .

[9]  D. Hunter,et al.  The Dynamics of British Health Policy , 1990 .

[10]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[11]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Who gets power — and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power , 1977 .

[12]  Raymond M. Lee,et al.  Doing Research on Sensitive Topics , 1993 .

[13]  E. Ferlie,et al.  Process Transformation: Limitations to Radical Organizational Change within Public Service Organizations , 2004 .

[14]  Frank Blackler,et al.  Power, mastery and organizational learning. , 2000 .

[15]  Russ Vince,et al.  Power and emotion in organizational learning , 2001 .

[16]  M E Spencer,et al.  Weber on legitimate norms and authority. , 1970, The British journal of sociology.

[17]  Wiliam Wiggenhorn,et al.  Motorola U: when training becomes an education , 1990 .

[18]  R. S. Meyers.  Managing With Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations , 1992 .

[19]  Aileen Clarke,et al.  Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services: Research Methods , 2001 .

[20]  J. Coopey.  The Learning Organization, Power, Politics and Ideology Introduction , 1995 .

[21]  J. Fitzmaurice.  Economy and Society , 1998 .