Magnetic coupled passive direct methanol fuel cell: Promoted CO2 removal and enhanced catalyst utilization

A novel approach was proposed to promote CO2 removal from the anode catalyst layer of a liquid-fed passive direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) by introducing Lorentz force via magnetic field integrating. Due to the promoted removal of CO2 micro-bubble, the physical block of triple-phase boundary in the anode catalyst layer was reduced evidently. CO2 removal was promoted through introducing forced convection around the CO2 bubbles which can be proved by the mathematical calculations. Performance of the vapor-fed DMFC, in where no CO2 bubble existing in the anode, did not change by the magnetic field, also indicated that the enhanced performance of the liquid-fed magnetic-coupled DMFC was resulted from the promotional CO2 removal. A 12.5% enhancement in maximum power density was obtained for the liquid-fed DMFC by combining the magnetic field.

[1]  Zhancheng Guo,et al.  The intensification technologies to water electrolysis for hydrogen production - A review , 2014 .

[2]  L. Schultz,et al.  Hydrogen evolution under the influence of a magnetic field , 2011 .

[3]  S. Jiang,et al.  Enhanced electrochemical activity of Pt nanowire network electrocatalysts for methanol oxidation reaction of fuel cells , 2011 .

[4]  J. Coey,et al.  Electrochemical noise analysis of the effects of a magnetic field on cathodic hydrogen evolution , 2009 .

[5]  Qiang Ye,et al.  In situ visualization study of CO2 gas bubble behavior in DMFC anode flow fields , 2005 .

[6]  L. Zhuang,et al.  A feasibility analysis for alkaline membrane direct methanol fuel cell: thermodynamic disadvantages versus kinetic advantages , 2003 .

[7]  D. Stolten,et al.  Novel method for investigation of two-phase flow in liquid feed direct methanol fuel cells using an aqueous H2O2 solution , 2004 .

[8]  A. Faghri,et al.  A transient, multi-phase and multi-component model of a new passive DMFC , 2006 .

[9]  Keith Scott,et al.  Carbon dioxide evolution patterns in direct methanol fuel cells , 1999 .

[10]  H. Matsushima,et al.  Gas bubble evolution on transparent electrode during water electrolysis in a magnetic field , 2013 .

[11]  Tianshou Zhao,et al.  A two-dimensional, two-phase mass transport model for liquid-feed DMFCs , 2007 .

[12]  Chao-Yang Wang,et al.  Two-phase transport and the role of micro-porous layer in polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2004 .

[13]  Corrado Santoro,et al.  Low methanol crossover and high efficiency direct methanol fuel cell: The influence of diffusion lay , 2011 .

[14]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  A review on methanol crossover in direct methanol fuel cells: challenges and achievements , 2011 .

[15]  Ho-jin Kweon,et al.  The Effect of the Anode Loading and Method of MEA Fabrication on DMFC Performance , 2007 .

[16]  Hongtan Liu,et al.  A three-dimensional two-phase flow model for a liquid-fed direct methanol fuel cell , 2007 .

[17]  Ulrich Stimming,et al.  Developments for Improved Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Stacks for Portable Power , 2007 .

[18]  Keith Scott,et al.  Electrochemical and gas evolution characteristics of direct methanol fuel cells with stainless steel mesh flow beds , 2001 .

[19]  Songtao Li,et al.  Design and simulation of a liquid electrolyte passive direct methanol fuel cell with low methanol crossover , 2011 .

[20]  J. Weidner,et al.  Experimental validation of a methanol crossover model in DMFC applications , 2008 .

[21]  A. Casalegno,et al.  Nanostructured Pd barrier for low methanol crossover DMFC , 2014 .

[22]  Jiujun Zhang,et al.  A review of water flooding issues in the proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2008 .