Pricing music using personal data: mutually advantageous first-degree price discrimination

In addition to customized products and services, personal data also enables personalized pricing. However, consumers are often unwilling to accept being price discriminated for fear that they would end up paying more for the same product or service. This article demonstrates that by rewarding consumers for disclosing personal information it is possible to achieve a situation where first-degree price discrimination is mutually advantageous and both buyers and sellers gain by adopting such a pricing model. The conditions required for this to happen are investigated and the impact on social welfare is discussed. Finally, the article considers the robustness of this model when consumers adopt an opportunistic behavior which consists in manipulating personal data in order to masquerade as a consumer with a lower willingness to pay.

[1]  Rajiv K. Sinha,et al.  Don't Think Twice, It's All Right: Music Piracy and Pricing in a DRM-Free Environment , 2010 .

[2]  Bettina Berendt,et al.  E-privacy in 2nd generation E-commerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior , 2001, EC '01.

[3]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity , 2015 .

[4]  Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsreihe,et al.  Would You Like to Be a Prosumer ? Information Revelation , Personalization and Price Discrimination in Electronic Markets , 2003 .

[5]  Curtis R. Taylor.  Consumer Privacy and the Market for Customer Information , 2004 .

[6]  H. Varian.  Price Discrimination and Social Welfare , 1985 .

[7]  Preyas S. Desai,et al.  Music Downloads and the Flip Side of Digital Rights Management , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[8]  H. Varian,et al.  Conditioning Prices on Purchase History , 2005 .

[9]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  The Value of Privacy Assurance: An Exploratory Field Experiment , 2007, MIS Q..

[10]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Consumer Privacy and Marketing Avoidance: A Static Model , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[11]  H. Simon,et al.  Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioural Science , 1966 .

[12]  Jonathan H. Hamilton,et al.  Nonlinear price discrimination with a finite number of consumers and constrained recontracting , 2004 .

[13]  Blake J. Roessler,et al.  The Value of Privacy , 2004 .

[14]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Shared Social Responsibility: A Field Experiment in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing and Charitable Giving , 2010, Science.

[15]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Hide and Seek: Costly Consumer Privacy in a Market with Repeat Purchases , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[16]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Overcoming Online Information Privacy Concerns: An Information-Processing Theory Approach , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  D. Encaoua,et al.  First-Degree Discrimination by a Duopoly: Pricing and Quality Choice , 2007 .

[18]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Disclosure : Motivators and Measurements , 2006 .

[19]  Alan T. Peacock,et al.  Classics in the theory of public finance , 1959 .

[20]  Martin Spann,et al.  Pricing in electronic markets and networks , 2010, Electron. Mark..

[21]  Ju-Young Kim,et al.  Pay what you Want: A New Participative Pricing Mechanism , 2009 .

[22]  J. Miguel Villas-Boas,et al.  Price Cycles in Markets with Customer Recognition , 2004 .

[23]  Francisco Galera,et al.  Welfare and Output in Third-Degree Price Discrimination: a Note , 2006 .

[24]  E. Lindahl.  Just Taxation—A Positive Solution , 1958 .

[25]  Thierry Rayna,et al.  Privacy or Piracy, Why Choose? Two Solutions to the Issue of Digital Rights Management and Protection of Personal Information , 2008 .

[26]  Timothy Hazledine.  Price discrimination in Cournot–Nash oligopoly , 2006 .

[27]  J. Miguel Villas-Boas,et al.  Dynamic Competition with Customer Recognition , 1999 .

[28]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Output and Welfare Implications of Monopolistic Third-Degree Price Discrimination , 1980 .

[29]  Alessandro Pavan,et al.  On the Optimality of Privacy in Sequential Contracting , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[30]  Thierry Rayna,et al.  Fighting Consumer Piracy with Graduated Response: An Evaluation of the French and British Implementations , 2010 .

[31]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[32]  Christopher M. Snyder,et al.  Bounding the Relative Profitability of Price Discrimination , 2004 .

[33]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Online Information Privacy: Measuring the Cost-Benefit Trade-Off , 2002, ICIS.

[34]  Duncan K. Foley,et al.  Lindahl's Solution and the Core of an Economy with Public Goods , 1970 .

[35]  Nir Vulkan,et al.  Electronic Commerce and Competitive First-Degree Price Discrimination , 2000 .

[36]  Thierry Rayna.  Understanding the Challenges of the Digital Economy: The Nature of Digital Goods , 2008 .

[37]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[38]  Mark J. Safferstone.  Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy , 1999 .

[39]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[40]  Qihong Liu,et al.  Imperfect price discrimination in a vertical differentiation model , 2005 .

[41]  Martin Spann,et al.  Pay what you Want: A New Participative Pricing Mechanism , 2009 .

[42]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Consumer Trust and Online Information Privacy , 2003, ICIS.

[43]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[44]  Oliver Günther,et al.  Privacy in e-commerce: stated preferences vs. actual behavior , 2005, CACM.

[45]  Helmut Bester,et al.  Coupons and Oligopolistic Price Discrimination , 1994 .

[46]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  Online social networks: why we disclose , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[47]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[48]  Thierry Rayna,et al.  White Knight or Trojan Horse? The Consequences of Digital Rights Management for Consumers, Firms and Society , 2009 .

[49]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Privacy Regulation and Online Advertising , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Joshua S. Gans,et al.  Perfect Price Discrimination with Costless Arbitrage , 2007 .

[51]  Ramnath K. Chellappa,et al.  Personalization versus Privacy: An Empirical Examination of the Online Consumer’s Dilemma , 2005, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[52]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Analyzing Online Information Privacy Concerns: An Information Processing Theory Approach , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[53]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .