Optimization of the simulation parameters for improving realism in anthropomorphic breast phantoms

Virtual clinical trials (VCTs) were introduced as a preclinical alternative to clinical imaging trials, and for the evaluation of breast imaging systems. Realism in computer models of breast anatomy (software phantoms), critical for VCT performance, can be improved by optimizing simulation parameters based on the analysis of clinical images. We optimized the simulation to improve the realism of simulated tissue compartments, defined by the breast Cooper’s ligaments. We utilized the anonymized, previously acquired CT images of a mastectomy specimen to manually segment 205 adipose compartments. We generated 1,440 anthropomorphic breast phantoms based on octree recursive partitioning. These phantoms included variations of simulation parameters—voxel size, number of compartments, percentage of dense tissue, and shape and orientation of the compartments. We compared distributions of the compartment volumes in segmented CT images and phantoms using Kolmogrov-Smirnov (KS) distance, Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence and a novel distance metric (based on weighted sum of distribution descriptors differences). We identified phantoms with the size distributions closest to CT images. For example, KS resulted in the phantom with 1000 compartments, ligament thickness of 0.4 mm and skin thickness of 12 mm. We applied multilevel analysis of variance (ANOVAN) to these distance measures to identify parameters that most significantly influence the simulated compartment size distribution. We have demonstrated an efficient method for the optimization of phantom parameters to achieve realistic distribution of adipose compartment size. The proposed methodology could be extended to other phantom parameters (e.g., ligaments and skin thicknesses), to further improve realism of the simulation and VCTs.

[1]  K Myers,et al.  MO-A-141-02: Session In Memory of Fearghus O't Foghludha - Virtual Tools for Validation of X-Ray Breast Imaging Systems. , 2013, Medical physics.

[2]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Reduction of artifacts in computer simulation of breast Cooper's ligaments , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  Predrag R. Bakic VIRTUAL CLINICAL TRIALS OF BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS , 2014 .

[4]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Two methods for simulation of dense tissue distribution in software breast phantoms , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Computer simulation of the breast subcutaneous and retromammary tissue for use in virtual clinical trials , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Towards Breast Anatomy Simulation Using GPUs , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[7]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Simulation of Breast Anatomy: Bridging the Radiology-Pathology Scale Gap , 2016, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[8]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Optimized generation of high resolution breast anthropomorphic software phantoms. , 2012, Medical physics.

[9]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Partial volume simulation in software breast phantoms , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  A Virtual Clinical Trial of FDG-PET Imaging of Breast Cancer: Effect of Variability on Response Assessment. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[11]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[12]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Roadmap for efficient parallelization of breast anatomy simulation , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Estimation of adipose compartment volumes in CT images of a mastectomy specimen , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  Predrag R. Bakic,et al.  SU‐E‐I‐153: A Method for Fast Generation of High Resolution Software Breast Phantoms , 2011 .

[15]  Nooshin Kiarashi Towards Realizing Virtual Clinical Trials for Optimization and Evaluation of Breast Imaging Systems , 2014 .

[16]  Varsha Shankla,et al.  Automatic insertion of simulated microcalcification clusters in a software breast phantom , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[17]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Description and Characterization of a Novel Method for Partial Volume Simulation in Software Breast Phantoms , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Andrew D. A. Maidment Virtual Clinical Trials for the Assessment of Novel Breast Screening Modalities , 2014, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[19]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Shape analysis of simulated breast anatomical structures , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[20]  Predrag R. Bakic,et al.  Monte Carlo testing and verification of numerical algorithm implementations , 2015, 2015 12th International Conference on Telecommunication in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS).

[21]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Simulation of Three Material Partial Volume Averaging in a Software Breast Phantom , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[22]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[23]  F. Massey The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit , 1951 .

[24]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Virtual Tools for the Evaluation of Breast Imaging: State-of-the Science and Future Directions , 2016, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[25]  John M Boone,et al.  Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data. , 2009, Medical physics.

[26]  Predrag Bakic,et al.  MO-FG-209-00: Recent Advances in Virtual Tools for Validation of 3D/4D Breast Imaging Systems (TG234). , 2016, Medical physics.

[27]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Realistic Simulation of Breast Tissue Microstructure in Software Anthropomorphic Phantoms , 2014, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[28]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Advanced Theory of Statistics: Volume 1, Distribution Theory , 1978 .

[29]  Predrag R. Bakic,et al.  Spatial distribution of adipose compartments size, shape and orientation in a CT breast image of a mastectomy specimen , 2015, 2015 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB).