Efficient detection in hyperspectral imagery

Hyperspectral sensors collect hundreds of narrow and contiguously spaced spectral bands of data. Such sensors provide fully registered high resolution spatial and spectral images that are invaluable in discriminating between man-made objects and natural clutter backgrounds. The price paid for this high resolution data is extremely large data sets, several hundred of Mbytes for a single scene, that make storage and transmission difficult, thus requiring fast onboard processing techniques to reduce the data being transmitted. Attempts to apply traditional maximum likelihood detection techniques for in-flight processing of these massive amounts of hyperspectral data suffer from two limitations: first, they neglect the spatial correlation of the clutter by treating it as spatially white noise; second, their computational cost renders them prohibitive without significant data reduction like by grouping the spectral bands into clusters, with a consequent loss of spectral resolution. This paper presents a maximum likelihood detector that successfully confronts both problems: rather than ignoring the spatial and spectral correlations, our detector exploits them to its advantage; and it is computationally expedient, its complexity increasing only linearly with the number of spectral bands available. Our approach is based on a Gauss-Markov random field (GMRF) modeling of the clutter, which has the advantage of providing a direct parameterization of the inverse of the clutter covariance, the quantity of interest in the test statistic. We discuss in detail two alternative GMRF detectors: one based on a binary hypothesis approach, and the other on a "single" hypothesis formulation. We analyze extensively with real hyperspectral imagery data (HYDICE and SEBASS) the performance of the detectors, comparing them to a benchmark detector, the RX-algorithm. Our results show that the GMRF "single" hypothesis detector outperforms significantly in computational cost the RX-algorithm, while delivering noticeable detection performance improvement.

[1]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Comparative analysis of hyperspectral adaptive matched filter detectors , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[2]  J. Wade Davis,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2003, Technometrics.

[3]  Craig R. Schwartz,et al.  Analysis of infrared multispectral target/background field measurements , 1994, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[4]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Hyperspectral imagery: Clutter adaptation in anomaly detection , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Edward A. Ashton,et al.  Detection of subpixel anomalies in multispectral infrared imagery using an adaptive Bayesian classifier , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Glenn Healey,et al.  Exploiting an atmospheric model for automated invariant material identification in hyperspectral imagery , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[7]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[8]  John W. Woods,et al.  Two-dimensional discrete Markovian fields , 1972, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  Mark L. G. Althouse,et al.  Least squares subspace projection approach to mixed pixel classification for hyperspectral images , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  John Fisher,et al.  Hyperspectral analysis and target detection system for the Adaptive Spectral Reconnaissance Program (ASRP) , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[11]  Nikhil Balram,et al.  Recursive structure of noncausal Gauss-Markov random fields , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  Remote sensing, models, and methods for image processing , 1997 .

[13]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Automatic target detection and recognition in multiband imagery: a unified ML detection and estimation approach , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Susan Marie Schweizer,et al.  The GMRF detector for hyperspectral imagery: An efficient fully-adaptive maximum likelihood detector , 1999 .

[15]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  15 Statistical algorithms for noncausal Gauss-Markov fields , 1993, Signal Processing and its Applications.

[16]  Charles F. Ferrara Adaptive spatial/spectral detection of subpixel targets with unknown spectral characteristics , 1994, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[17]  Anil K. Jain Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing , 2018, Control of Color Imaging Systems.

[18]  Wojciech Pieczynski,et al.  SEM algorithm and unsupervised statistical segmentation of satellite images , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Adaptive detection of subpixel targets using multiband frame sequences , 1991, Defense, Security, and Sensing.