Whole-of-government: does working together work?

The idea of whole-of-government processes as a pathway to more efficient and integrated government has risen in popularity in Australia over the past decade. Despite fairly widespread support for the principles of whole-of-government, a number of issues require serious consideration. The major areas of potential difficulty arise in relation to ensuring accountability for publicly funded activities, overcoming the silos created by departmentalism or vertical styles of management, and balancing inclusion in public policy development with the unwelcome effect of ‘many hands’, namely fragmentation and lack of coordination. In addition, and absent from much of the specific public administration literature on whole-of-government, is a consideration of the role of interpersonal relationships and individual behaviour as they impact on organisational values, ethics and culture. Four operational levels of ‘joining’ in the public sector are also identified, namely interdepartmental, intradepartmental, intergovernmental and intersectoral. Then, current whole-ofgovernment mechanisms at work in the Australian Department of Health and Ageing for developing child and youth health policy are identified and described in relation to these levels. Differences are observed and analysed between the child health and the youth health processes. Knowledge and attitudes of public servants to the whole-of-government vision are also seen as critical for the success of whole-of-government. Interviews with a sample of Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) officers with a key role in child and youth health policy development provide some experiential learning about the essence of the barriers and practical ingredients for success. Whole-of government – does working together

[1]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. , 1995 .

[2]  Roger Beale,et al.  TURF PROTECTION: CONFLICT BETWEEN AUTHORITIES , 1995 .

[3]  J. Goldsworth TRUST OR POWER , 1996 .

[4]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[5]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co-Ordination , 1998 .

[6]  Ida Vincent Collaboration and Integrated Services in the NSW Public Sector , 1999 .

[7]  C. Lane,et al.  Trust within and between organizations , 2000 .

[8]  C. Matheson,et al.  Policy Formulation in Australian Government: Vertical and Horizontal Axes , 2000 .

[9]  J. W. Grubbs Can Agencies Work Together? Collaboration in Public and Nonprofit Organizations , 2000 .

[10]  R. Mulgan 'Accountability': an ever-expanding concept? , 2000 .

[11]  R. Curtain Good Public Policy Making: How Australia Fares , 2001 .

[12]  J. Hyde,et al.  Working together – integrated governance , 2001 .

[13]  David Richards,et al.  Departmentalism and joined-up government , 2001 .

[14]  Mark Considine,et al.  The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships, and Joined-Up Services , 2002 .

[15]  Meredith Edwards,et al.  Public Sector Governance — Future Issues for Australia , 2002 .

[16]  Sue Gordon,et al.  Putting the Picture Together: Inquiry into Response by Government Agencies to Complaints of Family Violence and Child Abuse in Aboriginal Communities , 2002 .

[17]  Peter Wilkins,et al.  Accountability and Joined-up Government , 2002 .

[18]  T. Ling Delivering joined–up government in the UK: dimensions, issues and problems , 2002 .

[19]  M. Flinders,et al.  Governance in Whitehall , 2002 .

[20]  M. Maguire,et al.  Collaborative solutions or new policy problems: exploring multi-agency partnerships in education and health work , 2003 .