On the requirements to control neoclassical tearing modes in burning plasmas

Neoclassical tearing modes (NTMs) are magnetic islands which increase locally the radial transport and therefore degrade the plasma performance. They are self-sustained by the bootstrap current perturbed by the enhanced radial transport. The confinement degradation is proportional to the island width and to the position of the resonant surface. The q = 2 NTMs are much more detrimental to the confinement than the 3/2 modes due to their larger radii. NTMs are metastable in typical scenarios with βN ≥ 1 and in the region where the safety factor is increasing with radius. This is due to the fact that the local perturbed pressure gradient is sufficient to self-sustain an existing magnetic island. The main questions for burning plasmas are whether there is a trigger mechanism which will destabilize NTMs, and what is the best strategy to control/avoid the modes. The latter has to take into account the main aim which is to maximize the Q factor, but also the controllability of the scenario. Standardized and simplified equations are proposed to enable easier prediction of NTM control in burning plasmas from present experimental results. The present expected requirements for NTM control with localized electron cyclotron current drive (ECCD) in ITER are discussed in detail. Other aspects of the above questions are also discussed, in particular the role of partial stabilization of NTMs, the possibility to control NTMs at small size with little ECH power and the differences between controlling NTMs at the resonant surface or controlling the main trigger source, for the standard scenario namely the sawteeth. It is shown that there is no unique best strategy, but several tools are needed to most efficiently reduce the impact of NTMs on burning plasmas.

[1]  R J Buttery,et al.  Destabilization of fast-ion-induced long sawteeth by localized current drive in the JET tokamak. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[2]  M. Rosenbluth,et al.  Model for the sawtooth period and amplitude , 1996 .

[3]  E. J. Strait,et al.  Advanced techniques for neoclassical tearing mode control in DIII-D , 2009 .

[4]  S. D. Pinches,et al.  Reduction of the ion drive and ρ*θ scaling of the neoclassical tearing mode , 2002 .

[5]  H. Zohm,et al.  Cross–machine benchmarking for ITER of neoclassical tearing mode stabilization by electron cyclotron current drive , 2006 .

[6]  H. Zohm,et al.  Stabilization of neoclassical tearing modes by electron cyclotron current drive , 1997 .

[7]  Xavier Garbet,et al.  Curvature effects on the dynamics of tearing modes in tokamaks , 2001 .

[8]  R Akers,et al.  Neoclassical tearing physics in the spherical tokamak MAST. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[9]  G. Ramponi,et al.  On the stabilization of neoclassical tearing modes by electron cyclotron waves , 1999 .

[10]  Olivier Sauter,et al.  Scaling of the marginal βp of neoclassical tearing modes during power ramp-down experiments in ASDEX Upgrade , 2003 .

[11]  Olivier Sauter,et al.  Marginal β-limit for neoclassical tearing modes in JET H-mode discharges , 2002 .

[12]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Helical temperature perturbations associated with tearing modes in tokamak plasmas , 1995 .

[13]  R. J. La Haye,et al.  Prospects for stabilization of neoclassical tearing modes by electron cyclotron current drive in ITER , 2009 .

[14]  H. Zohm,et al.  Neoclassical Tearing Modes , 2000 .

[15]  Jet Team,et al.  Observation of neoclassical tearing modes in JET , 1999 .

[16]  A. Mikhailovskii Theory of magnetic islands in tokamaks with accenting neoclassicaltearing modes , 2003 .

[17]  Olivier Sauter,et al.  Physics analysis of the ITER ECW system for optimized performance , 2008 .

[18]  A. Polevoi,et al.  Chapter 1: Overview and summary , 2007 .

[19]  Olivier Sauter,et al.  Threshold for metastable tearing modes in DIII-D , 1998 .

[20]  F. Leuterer,et al.  Enhancement of the stabilization efficiency of a neoclassical magnetic island by modulated electron cyclotron current drive in the ASDEX upgrade tokamak. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[21]  H. Koslowski,et al.  Tearing mode stabilization by electron cyclotron resonance heating demonstrated in the TEXTOR tokamak and the implication for ITER , 2007 .

[22]  O Sauter,et al.  From current-driven to neoclassically driven tearing modes. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[23]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  CONTROL OF NEOCLASSICAL TEARING MODES IN DIII-D , 2001 .

[24]  J. Callen,et al.  Global energy confinement degradation due to macroscopic phenomena in tokamaks , 1990 .

[25]  Costanza Zucca Modeling and control of the current density profile in tokamaks and its relation to electron transport , 2009 .

[26]  Olivier Sauter,et al.  On the contribution of local current density to neoclassical tearing mode stabilization , 2004 .

[27]  James D. Callen,et al.  On the stabilization of neoclassical magnetohydrodynamic tearing modes using localized current drive or heating , 1997 .

[28]  T. A. Gianakon,et al.  Dynamical modelling of tearing mode stabilization by RF current drive , 1999 .

[29]  O. Sauter,et al.  Comparison of m = 2, n = 1 neo-classical tearing mode limits in JET and DIII-D , 2004 .

[30]  T. T. Suzuki,et al.  Stabilization of neoclassical tearing modes by electron cyclotron current drive in JT-60U , 2007 .

[31]  R. Carrera,et al.  Island bootstrap current modification of the nonlinear dynamics of the tearing mode , 1986 .

[32]  Gunter,et al.  Complete suppression of neoclassical tearing modes with current drive at the electron-cyclotron-resonance frequency in ASDEX upgrade tokamak , 2000, Physical review letters.

[33]  O. Sauter,et al.  Control of neoclassical tearing modes by sawtooth control. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[34]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Beta limits in long-pulse tokamak discharges , 1997 .

[35]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Requirements for alignment of electron cyclotron current drive for neoclassical tearing mode stabilization in ITER , 2008 .