Predicting the behavioral impact of transcranial direct current stimulation: issues and limitations

The transcranial application of weak currents to the human brain has enjoyed a decade of widespread use, providing a simple and powerful tool for non-invasively altering human brain function. However, our understanding of current delivery and its impact upon neural circuitry leaves much to be desired. We argue that the credibility of conclusions drawn with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is contingent upon realistic explanations of how tDCS works, and that our present understanding of tDCS limits the technique’s use to localize function in the human brain. We outline two central issues where progress is required: the localization of currents, and predicting their functional consequence. We encourage experimenters to eschew simplistic explanations of mechanisms of transcranial current stimulation. We suggest the use of individualized current modeling, together with computational neurostimulation to inform mechanistic frameworks in which to interpret the physiological impact of tDCS. We hope that through mechanistically richer descriptions of current flow and action, insight into the biological processes by which transcranial currents influence behavior can be gained, leading to more effective stimulation protocols and empowering conclusions drawn with tDCS.

[1]  N. Ward Faculty Opinions recommendation of Predicting the behavioral impact of transcranial direct current stimulation: issues and limitations. , 2014 .

[2]  S. Bestmann,et al.  Combined neurostimulation and neuroimaging in cognitive neuroscience: past, present, and future , 2013, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: A basis for high-definition tDCS , 2013, NeuroImage.

[4]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Comparing Cortical Plasticity Induced by Conventional and High-Definition 4 × 1 Ring tDCS: A Neurophysiological Study , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[5]  M. Bikson,et al.  Computational modeling of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in obesity: Impact of head fat and dose guidelines☆ , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[6]  L. Parra,et al.  Validation of finite element model of transcranial electrical stimulation using scalp potentials: implications for clinical dose , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  L. Parra,et al.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  F. Wendling,et al.  Transcranial Current Brain Stimulation (tCS): Models and Technologies , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Giulio Ruffini,et al.  The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation , 2013, NeuroImage.

[10]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: An optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[11]  R. Cohen Kadosh,et al.  The Mental Cost of Cognitive Enhancement , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  On the role of electric field orientation in optimal design of transcranial current stimulation , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  Yu Huang,et al.  An automated method for high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation modeling , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  L. Parra,et al.  Inter-Individual Variation during Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Normalization of Dose Using MRI-Derived Computational Models , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[15]  J. Brasil-Neto Learning, Memory, and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[16]  L. Merabet,et al.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[17]  M. Bikson,et al.  Computational Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2012, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[18]  J. Delgado-García,et al.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates synaptic mechanisms involved in associative learning in behaving rabbits , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  V. Di Lazzaro,et al.  Modulation of LTP at rat hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses by direct current stimulation. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Xin Zheng,et al.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on human regional cerebral blood flow , 2011, NeuroImage.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  An In Vivo Assay of Synaptic Function Mediating Human Cognition , 2011, Current Biology.

[22]  L. Parra,et al.  Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[23]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Beyond the target area: remote effects of non‐invasive brain stimulation in humans , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  Mark D. McDonnell,et al.  The benefits of noise in neural systems: bridging theory and experiment , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Stochastic Resonance Effects Reveal the Neural Mechanisms of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[27]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[28]  M. Bikson,et al.  Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[29]  P. Rossini,et al.  Consensus paper: Combining transcranial stimulation with neuroimaging , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[30]  R. Lemon,et al.  State of the art: Physiology of transcranial motor cortex stimulation , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[31]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Sean L. Hill,et al.  Modeling the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical circuits. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[34]  J. Jefferys,et al.  Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[36]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  P. Goldman-Rakic Regional and cellular fractionation of working memory. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  C. Marsden,et al.  Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Effects of electric fields on transmembrane potential and excitability of turtle cerebellar Purkinje cells in vitro. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  K. Mills,et al.  Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  R. Morris,et al.  Making memories last: the synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  N. D. Stein,et al.  Stochastic resonance , 1993, Scholarpedia.

[43]  Markus Voelter,et al.  State of the Art , 1997, Pediatric Research.

[44]  C. Bellone,et al.  ON A ROLE , 1996 .

[45]  F. Attneave,et al.  The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory , 1949 .