Computer assisted surgery of the distal humerus can employ contralateral images for pre-operative planning, registration, and surgical intervention.

BACKGROUND Bone loss at the distal humerus can lead to errors in the identification of the elbow's flexion-extension axis. Referencing the anatomy of the contralateral (uninjured) elbow may prove beneficial in accurately defining this axis. The objective of this study was to compare distal humeral morphology between paired specimens and determine whether geometric differences exist. METHODS Medical CT images of 25 paired, dry cadaveric, distal humeri were acquired and a range of anatomic characteristics were measured, following registration of each pair to a common coordinate system. RESULTS The anthropometric features of the distal humerus were similar from side-to-side, with differences on the order of 1.0 degrees and 0.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative imaging of the contralateral normal elbow may be employed in patients with peri-articular bone loss, where referencing anatomic landmarks of the injured side is not possible.

[1]  Colin P McDonald,et al.  A comparison of registration techniques for computer- and image-assisted elbow surgery , 2007, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[2]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  J. London.  Kinematics of the elbow. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  F C Ewald.  Motion and laxity of the capitellocondylar total elbow prosthesis. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  M. Kronberg,et al.  Retroversion of the humeral head in the normal shoulder and its relationship to the normal range of motion. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  Gilles Walch,et al.  The Three-Dimensional Geometry of the Proximal Humerus: Implications for Surgical Technique and Prosthetic Design , 1997 .

[7]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Surgeon accuracy in the selection of the flexion-extension axis of the elbow: an in vitro study. , 2006, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[8]  Bernard F. Morrey,et al.  The Elbow and Its Disorders , 2000 .

[9]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Daniel B. Russakoff,et al.  Intensity-based 2D-3D spine image registration incorporating a single fiducial marker. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[11]  R. Ellis,et al.  Computer-assisted distal radius osteotomy. , 2003, The Journal of hand surgery.

[12]  William J. Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit , 2005, The Visualization Handbook.

[13]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Morphologic analysis of the distal humerus with special interest in elbow implant sizing and alignment. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[14]  田村 裕一.  Surface-based registration accuracy of CT-based image-guided spine surgery , 2005 .

[15]  Kai-Nan An.  Kinematics and constraint of total elbow arthroplasty. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[16]  L. Amiot,et al.  Computed Tomography-Based Navigation for Hip, Knee, and Spine Surgery , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  I. Hvid,et al.  Total condylar knee arthroplasty. Prosthetic component positioning and radiolucent lines. , 1984, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[18]  H E Veeger,et al.  Determination of the optimal elbow axis for evaluation of placement of prostheses. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[19]  T Nishii,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[20]  Chitranjan S. Ranawat,et al.  Total-Condylar Knee Arthroplasty , 1985, Springer New York.

[21]  R Shapiro,et al.  Biomechanics of the elbow. , 1994, Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

[22]  J T Bryant,et al.  Geometry of the humeroulnar joint , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  R. Morris,et al.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  Randy E. Ellis,et al.  Fixation-Based Surgery: A New Technique for Distal Radius Osteotomy , 2000, MICCAI.

[25]  A. Nassr,et al.  Osseous anatomy of the distal humerus and proximal ulna: implications for total elbow arthroplasty. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[26]  F. Smith,et al.  Measurement of the bony anatomy of the humerus using magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[27]  Colin P McDonald,et al.  The effect of anatomic landmark selection of the distal humerus on registration accuracy in computer-assisted elbow surgery. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[28]  James A. Johnson,et al.  An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[29]  Randy E. Ellis,et al.  Robust registration for computer-integrated orthopedic surgery: Laboratory validation and clinical experience , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[30]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[31]  Ken Yamaguchi,et al.  Elbow arthroplasty using a convertible implant. , 2005, Techniques in hand & upper extremity surgery.