Graphically driven interactive finite element stress reanalysis for machine elements in the early design stage

In this work a new graphically driven interactive stress reanalysis finite element technique has been developed so that an engineer can easily carry out manual geometric changes in a machine element during the early design stage. The interface allow an engineer to model a machine element in the commercial finite element code ANSYS® and then modify part geometry graphically to see instantaneous graphical changes in the stress and displacement contour plots. A reanalysis technique is used to enhance the computational performance for solving the modified problem; with the aim of obtaining results of acceptable accuracy in a short a period of time in order to emphasize the interactive nature of the design process.Three case studies are considered to demonstrate the effectiveness of the prototype graphically driven reanalysis finite element technique. The finite element type considered is a plane stress four-node quadrilateral based on a homogenous, isotropic, linear elastic material. The first two problems consider a plate with hole and plate with fillets. These two examples demonstrate that by changing the hole and fillet size/shape, an engineer can manually obtain an optimum design based on the stress concentration factor, i.e. engineer-driven optimization process. Each case study considered multiple redesigns. A combined approximation reanalysis method is used to solve each redesigned problem. The third case study considers a support bracket. The goal is to design the cantilever portion of the bracket to have uniform strength and to minimize the stress concentration at the fillet.

[1]  W Waldman,et al.  Optimal free-form shapes for shoulder fillets in flat plates under tension and bending , 2001 .

[2]  Barry Hilary Valentine Topping,et al.  Static Reanalysis: A Review , 1987 .

[3]  Uri Kirsch,et al.  Structural Reanalysis for General Layout Modifications , 1997 .

[4]  Barna A. Szabó,et al.  Finite element analysis in professional practice , 1996 .

[5]  K. Woodgate,et al.  Efficient stiffness matrix estimation for elastic structures , 1998 .

[6]  Jesse C. Jones,et al.  The Engineering Design Process , 1993 .

[7]  G. Verchery,et al.  AN EXACT STRUCTURAL STATIC REANALYSIS METHOD , 1997 .

[8]  Ahmed K. Noor,et al.  Recent Advances and Applications of Reduction Methods , 1994 .

[9]  Vince Adams,et al.  Building Better Products with Finite Element Analysis , 1998 .

[10]  Fred Moses,et al.  An improved reanalysis method for grillage-type structures , 1998 .

[11]  D'arcy W. Thompson.  On Growth and Form , 1945 .

[12]  T Haftka Raphael,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[13]  Kurt M. Marshek,et al.  Fundamentals of Machine Component Design , 1991 .

[14]  U. Kirsch,et al.  Exact and Accurate Reanalysis of Structures for Geometrical Changes , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[15]  Walter D. Pilkey.  Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors , 1997 .

[16]  U. Kirsch,et al.  Exact structural reanalysis by a first-order reduced basis approach , 1995 .

[17]  H. Miura,et al.  An approximate analysis technique for design calculations , 1971 .

[18]  R. Averill,et al.  Finite element solution refinement using combined approximations reanalysis , 2001 .

[19]  Uri Kirsch,et al.  Optimum structural design: Concepts, methods, and applications , 1981 .