Greenhouse Crop Transpiration Modelling

Aim of this chapter is to present the parameters affecting greenhouse crop transpiration and the existing models for greenhouse crop transpiration simulation. In the first paragraphs of the chapter, the importance of crop transpiration on greenhouse microclimate and on crop is presented and discussed. Presentation, analysis and discussion of the parameters affecting greenhouse crop transpiration and the thermal and hydrological negative feedback effects follow. Finally, the existing models for greenhouse crop transpiration simulation are presented and discussed. Transpiration is an important component of canopy energy and water balance and thus, a major cooling mechanism of greenhouse crop canopies. Its estimation is essential for climate and irrigation control and that is why it has been given much attention in greenhouse climate research. Air temperature and vapour pressure deficit are parameters affecting the thermal and hydrological negative feedback effects existing in a greenhouse. In addition, the main factors affecting greenhouse crop transpiration are solar radiation, vapour pressure deficit and canopy and aerodynamic conductances. Several authors have proposed models that allow getting a more accurate estimation of the crop transpiration rate. More sophisticated transpiration models are based on leaf (canopy) transpiration and leaf energy balance models in which the transpiration is characterized by the canopy resistance, as proposed initially by Penman and modified by Monteith to account for the stomatal response of the crop (P-M formula). However, the use of the complete P-M formula requires the knowledge of several inputs or parameters that are not easily available. Particularly, the aerodynamic and stomatal leaf resistances have to be known for each crop species and possibly, for each cultivar. That is why researchers have tried to overcome the estimation of these resistances by using a simplified form of the P-M formula. Transpiration models with the greenhouse climate as a boundary condition were first developed in the northern regions of Europe and North America for horticultural crops. In these northern conditions, the glasshouse is generally poorly ventilated during a large part of the growing season. The boundary layer conductance for glasshouse crops tends to be much smaller than would be expected for similar crops growing outdoors. Thus, glasshouse crops are very strongly decoupled from the outside atmosphere by the presence of the glass, and the heat and the water released at crop surface will accumulate inside the

[1]  Nader Katerji,et al.  Modelling evapotranspiration of six irrigated crops under Mediterranean climate conditions , 2006 .

[2]  S. Singer,et al.  Principles of environmental physics (contemporary biology series): by John L. Monteith. 241 pages, diagrams, 512 × 812 in. New York, American Elsevier Publishing Co., 1973. Price, $20.00. , 1975 .

[3]  O. Jolliet,et al.  HORTITRANS, a model for predicting and optimizing humidity and transpiration in greenhouses , 1994 .

[4]  Ted H. Short,et al.  Transpiration, leaf temperature and stomatal resistance of a greenhouse cucumber crop☆ , 1990 .

[5]  J. L. Monteith,et al.  Implications of stomatal response to saturation deficit for the heat balance of vegetation , 1986 .

[6]  A. Baille,et al.  Microclimate and transpiration of greenhouse rose crops , 1994 .

[7]  T. Boulard,et al.  Greenhouse crop transpiration simulation from external climate conditions , 2000 .

[8]  Marcel Fuchs,et al.  Cooling of roses in greenhouses. , 2000 .

[9]  G. Farquhar Feedforward Responses of Stomata to Humidity , 1978 .

[10]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions , 1987 .

[11]  Xiusheng Yang Comments on ‘Thermal and aerodynamic conditions in greenhouses in relation to estimation of heat flux and evapotranspiration’ , 1995 .

[12]  J. Bunce Effect of boundary layer conductance on the response of stomata to humidity , 1985 .

[13]  G. Collatz,et al.  Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer , 1991 .

[14]  L. Kappen,et al.  Responses of stomata to changes in humidity , 1971, Planta.

[15]  Thierry Boulard,et al.  A simple greenhouse climate control model incorporating effects of ventilation and evaporative cooling , 1993 .

[16]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Leaf conductance as a function of photosynthetic photon flux density and absolute humidity difference from leaf to air. , 1982, Plant physiology.

[17]  B. Hicks,et al.  A canopy stomatal resistance model for gaseous deposition to vegetated surfaces , 1987 .

[18]  J. Monteith Coupling of plants to the atmosphere , 1981 .

[19]  A. Baille,et al.  SIMULATING THE BEHAVIOUR OF A GREENHOUSE ROSE CROP BY MEANS OF A MODEL INCLUDING PHYSICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL FEEDBACK LOOPS , 2001 .

[20]  G. Papadakis,et al.  Experimental investigation and modelling of heat and mass transfer between a tomato crop and the greenhouse environment , 1994 .

[21]  M. Fuchs Effects of ventilation on the energy balance of a greenhouse with bare soil*1 , 1997 .

[22]  P. G. Jarvis,et al.  Photosynthesis in Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.): VI. Response of Stomata to Temperature , 1975 .

[23]  Z. Uchijima,et al.  A Model for the Greenhouse Environment as Affected by the Mass and Energy Exchange of a Crop , 1977 .

[24]  C. Stanghellini,et al.  Transpiration of greenhouse crops : an aid to climate management , 1987 .

[25]  L. Alados-Arboledas,et al.  Direct and diffuse photosynthetically active radiation: measurements and modelling , 1999 .

[26]  C. Stanghellini Response to comments on ?Thermal and aerodynamic conditions in greenhouses in relation to estimation of heat flux and evapotranspiration? , 1995 .

[27]  Ido Seginer Alternative Design Formulae for the Ventilation Rate of Greenhouses , 1997 .

[28]  J. F. Meneses,et al.  Influence of soil covering, plastic ageing and roof whitening on climate and tomato crop response in an unheated plastic Mediterranean greenhouse. , 2000 .

[29]  L. Fritschen,et al.  Estimating stomatal diffusion resistance for Douglas-fir, lodgepole pine and white oak under light saturated conditions , 1985 .

[30]  M. Teitel,et al.  Radiative field uniformity under shading screens under greenhouse vs whitewash in Spain. , 2000 .

[31]  A. Bailleb,et al.  Effect of misting on transpiration and conductances of a greenhouse rose canopy , 2000 .

[32]  D. Grantz,et al.  Stomatal responses to light and leaf-air water vapor pressure difference show similar kinetics in sugarcane and soybean. , 1986, Plant physiology.

[33]  Marisa Gallardo,et al.  Evapotranspiration of horticultural crops in an unheated plastic greenhouse , 2005 .

[34]  N. Katsoulas,et al.  Transpiration and energy balance of a greenhouse rose crop in mediterranean summer conditions , 2001 .

[35]  N. Zieslin,et al.  The response of rose plants to evaporative cooling: Flower production and quality , 1979 .

[36]  C. Post,et al.  I. BASIC PROBLEMS OF WATER RELATIONSHIP - ENERGY BALANCE AND WATER SUPPLY IN GLASSHOUSES IN THE WEST-NETHERLANDS , 1974 .

[37]  B. J. Bailey,et al.  The effect of climate on tomato transpiration in greenhouses : measurements and models comparison , 1992 .

[38]  J. Cock,et al.  The Humidity Factor in Stomatal Cokttrol and Its Effect on Crop Productivity , 1986 .

[39]  M. Aubinet,et al.  Stomatal regulation in greenhouse crops: analysis and simulation , 1989 .

[40]  R. Avissar,et al.  A model to simulate response of plant stomata to environmental conditions , 1985 .

[41]  Constantinos Kittas,et al.  TRANSPIRATION AND CANOPY RESISTANCE OF GREENHOUSE SOILLESS ROSES: MEASUREMENTS AND MODELING , 1999 .

[42]  N. Katsoulas,et al.  Influence of greenhouse ventilation regime on the microclimate and energy partitioning of a rose canopy during summer conditions , 2001 .

[43]  E. Fereresa,et al.  Evapotranspiration of horticultural crops in an unheated plastic greenhouse , 2005 .

[44]  N. Zieslin,et al.  The Effect of Canopy Wetting on Plant Water Status, CO2 Fixation, Ion Content and Growth Rate of ‘Baccara’ Roses , 1977 .

[45]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis , 1982 .

[46]  A. Arbel,et al.  Performance of a Fog System for Cooling Greenhouses , 1999 .

[47]  E. Zeiger,et al.  The biology of stomatal guard cells , 1983 .

[48]  P. Jarvis The Interpretation of the Variations in Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance Found in Canopies in the Field , 1976 .

[49]  W. O. Pruitt,et al.  Crop water requirements , 1997 .

[50]  Sherwood B. Idso,et al.  An empirical model for stomatal resistance of field-grown wheat , 1985 .

[51]  Constantinos Kittas,et al.  SE—Structures and Environment: Influence of Leaf Area Index on Canopy Energy Partitioning and Greenhouse Cooling Requirements , 2002 .

[52]  C. Stanghellini Microclimate and transpiration of greenhouse crops , 1988 .

[53]  A. Okuya,et al.  THE TRANSPIRATION OF GREENHOUSE TOMATO PLANTS IN ROCKWOOL CULTURE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO CLIMATIC FACTORS , 1988 .

[54]  O. de Villele,et al.  BESOINS EN EAU DES CULTURES SOUS SERRE - ESSAI DE CONDUITE DES ARROSA GES EN FONCTION DE L'ENSOLEILLEMENT , 1974 .

[55]  A. Baille GREENHOUSE STRUCTURE AND EQUIPMENT FOR IMPROVING CROP PRODUCTION IN MILD WINTER CLIMATES , 1999 .

[56]  Ido Seginer,et al.  Transpirational cooling of a greenhouse crop with partial ground cover , 1994 .

[57]  E. Nederhoff,et al.  Canopy Photosynthesis of Tomato, Cucumber and Sweet Pepper in Greenhouses: Measurements Compared to Models , 1994 .

[58]  M. Wu,et al.  Principles of environmental physics , 2004, Plant Growth Regulation.

[59]  G. Stanhill,et al.  An experimental comparison of evaporative cooling in a naturally ventilated glasshouse due to wetting the outer roof and inner crop soil surfaces , 1983 .

[60]  Charles L. Epstein,et al.  Measurements and Modeling , 2008 .

[61]  Bhaskar J. Choudhury,et al.  Simulating the effects of weather variables and soil water potential on a corn canopy temperature , 1983 .

[62]  A. Baille,et al.  Canopy surface resistances to water vapour transfer for nine greenhouse pot plant crops , 1994 .

[63]  John L. Monteith,et al.  A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity , 1995 .

[64]  Thierry Boulard,et al.  Etude de différentes méthodes de refroidissement sur le climat et la transpiration de tomates de serre , 1991 .

[65]  A. Lindroth Canopy Conductance of Coniferous Forests Related to Climate , 1985 .

[66]  D. S. Munro Stomatal conductances and surface conductance modelling in a mixed wetland forest , 1989 .

[67]  P. Schuepp,et al.  Tansley Review No. 59 Leaf boundary layers. , 1993, The New phytologist.

[68]  J. C. Bakker Leaf conductance of four glasshouse vegetable crops as affected by air humidity , 1991 .