A Comparative Study of Feature Extraction Methods for Wood Texture Classification

The objective of this paper is to evaluate the classification performance of several feature extraction and classification methods for exotic wood texture images as dataset. The Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix, Local Binary Patterns, Wavelet, Ranklet, Granulometry, and Laws’ Masks will be used to extract features from the images. The extracted features are then fed into five classification techniques: Linear and Quadratic Classifier, Neural Networks, Support Vector Machine, and K-Nearest Neighbor so that each class membership can be obtained. The success rate of each method then measured by comparing the predicted labels and its ground truth so that in the end, the best feature extraction method will be indicated by the highest classification rate. This paper provides recommendations in feature extraction method and classification technique which may give good result in similar task. By considering several factors, such as: computational complexity, classification rate, and running time, this work has found that LBP is more appropriate to analyze wood texture.

[1]  Esther de Ves,et al.  Selecting the structuring element for morphological texture classification , 2006, Pattern Analysis and Applications.

[2]  M. Aly Survey on Multiclass Classification Methods , 2005 .

[3]  Z. Zhong,et al.  Improved segmentation of semiconductor defects using area sieves , 2005, Machine Vision and Applications.

[4]  Renato Campanini,et al.  Texture classification using invariant ranklet features , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[5]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Graham D. Finlayson,et al.  The 1.5D sieve algorithm , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[7]  Ziad Alqadi,et al.  Separating Low Pass and High Pass Frequencies in the Image Without Loosing Information , 2007 .

[8]  Paul Southam,et al.  Texture Granularities , 2005, ICIAP.

[9]  Xianghua Xie,et al.  A Galaxy of Texture Features , 2008 .

[10]  C.-C. Jay Kuo,et al.  Texture analysis and classification with tree-structured wavelet transform , 1993, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  Fabrizio Smeraldi Fast algorithms for the computation of Ranklets , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[12]  Paul Southam,et al.  Compact rotation-invariant texture classification , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04..

[13]  Robert P.W. Duin,et al.  PRTools3: A Matlab Toolbox for Pattern Recognition , 2000 .

[14]  Xianghua Xie,et al.  Handbook of Texture Analysis , 2008 .

[15]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  A Texture Analysis Approach to Corrosion Image Classification , 1996 .

[16]  Yoshitomo Yaginuma,et al.  A 2D Texture Image Retrieval Technique based on Texture Energy Filters , 2009, IMAGAPP.

[17]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..