Spatial surplus production modeling of Atlantic tunas and billfish.

We formulate and simulation-test a spatial surplus production model that provides a basis with which to undertake multispecies, multi-area, stock assessment. Movement between areas is parameterized using a simple gravity model that includes a "residency" parameter that determines the degree of stock mixing among areas. The model is deliberately simple in order to (1) accommodate nontarget species that typically have fewer available data and (2) minimize computational demand to enable simulation evaluation of spatial management strategies. Using this model, we demonstrate that careful consideration of spatial catch and effort data can provide the basis for simple yet reliable spatial stock assessments. If simple spatial dynamics can be assumed, tagging data are not required to reliably estimate spatial distribution and movement. When applied to eight stocks of Atlantic tuna and billfish, the model tracks regional catch data relatively well by approximating local depletions and exchange among high-abundance areas. We use these results to investigate and discuss the implications of using spatially aggregated stock assessment for fisheries in which the distribution of both the population and fishing vary over time.

[1]  T. Carruthers,et al.  Erratum: Simulating spatial dynamics to evaluate methods of deriving abundance indices for tropical tunas , 2010 .

[2]  J. F. Caddy,et al.  Spatial Model for an Exploited Shellfish Population, and its Application to the Georges Bank Scallop Fishery , 1975 .

[3]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Multispecies spatial assessment models for the British Columbia groundfish trawl fishery , 1999 .

[4]  P. Lewy,et al.  Modelling the distribution of fish accounting for spatial correlation and overdispersion , 2009 .

[5]  C. Walters.  Folly and fantasy in the analysis of spatial catch rate data , 2003 .

[6]  R. Campbell.  CPUE standardisation and the construction of indices of stock abundance in a spatially varying fishery using general linear models , 2004 .

[7]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Representation of multistanza life histories in Ecospace models for spatial organization of ecosystem trophic interaction patterns , 2010 .

[8]  A. Punt,et al.  Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches , 2004 .

[9]  T. Carruthers,et al.  COMPUTING PRIOR PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR THE INTRINSIC RATE OF INCREASE FOR ATLANTIC TUNA AND BILLFISH USING DEMOGRAPHIC METHODS , 2011 .

[10]  Stéphanie Mahévas,et al.  Spatially explicit fisheries simulation models for policy evaluation , 2005 .

[11]  J. Santiago,et al.  An integrated growth study for North Atlantic albacore (Thunnus alalunga Bonn. 1788) , 2005 .

[12]  J. Pella,et al.  A generalized stock production model , 1969 .

[13]  R. Deriso.  Harvesting Strategies and Parameter Estimation for an Age-Structured Model , 1980 .

[14]  Murdoch K. McAllister,et al.  Using demographic methods to construct Bayesian priors for the intrinsic rate of increase in the Schaefer model and implications for stock rebuilding , 2001 .

[15]  J. V. Tagart,et al.  Stock Reduction Analysis, Another Solution to the Catch Equations , 1982 .

[16]  Patrick Lehodey,et al.  Predicting skipjack tuna forage distributions in the equatorial Pacific using a coupled dynamical bio-geochemical model , 1998 .

[17]  William N. Venables,et al.  GLMs, GAMs and GLMMs: an overview of theory for applications in fisheries research , 2004 .

[18]  Mark N. Maunder,et al.  Is it time to discard the Schaefer model from the stock assessment scientist's toolbox? , 2003 .

[19]  K. Hiramatsu,et al.  Developing a management procedure robust to uncertainty for southern bluefin tuna: a somewhat frustrating struggle to bridge the gap between ideals and reality , 2010, Population Ecology.

[20]  John Turner,et al.  Model uncertainty in the ecosystem approach to fisheries , 2007 .