The use and role of open source software applications in public and not-for-profit hospitals in the United States

Background: The potential cost savings and customizability of open source software (OSS) may be particularly attractive for hospitals. However, numerous health-care-specific OSS applications exist, the adoption of OSS health information technology (HIT) applications is not widespread in the United States. Purpose: This disconnect between the availability of promising software and low adoption raises the basic question: If OSS HIT is so advantageous, why are more health care organizations not using it? Methodology: We interviewed the chief information officer, or equivalent position, at 17 not-for-profit and public hospitals across the United States. Through targeted recruitment, our sample included nine hospitals using OSS HIT and eight hospitals not using OSS HIT. The open-ended interview questions were guided by domains included in the fit-viability theory, an organizational-level innovation adoption framework, and those suggested by a review of the literature. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive and comparative approach, which involved an open coding for relevant themes. Findings: Interviews described the state of OSS use in hospitals. Specifically, general OSS applications were widely used by IT professionals. In addition, hospitals using OSS HIT still relied heavily on vendor support. In terms of why decisions arose to use OSS HIT, several hospitals using OSS HIT noted the cost advantages. In contrast, hospitals avoiding OSS HIT were clear, OSS as a class did not fit with clinical work and posed too much risk. Practice Implications: Perceptions of OSS HIT ranged from enthusiastic embracement to resigned adoption, to refusal, to abandonment. Some organizations were achieving success with their OSS HIT choices, but they still relied on vendors for significant support. The decision to adopt OSS HIT was not uniform but contingent upon views of the risk posed by the technology, economic factors, and the hospital’s existing capabilities.

[1]  David Hartzband,et al.  Open Source Software: A Primer for Health Care Leaders , 2006 .

[2]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Factors Influencing the Level of Vitality and Popularity of Open Source Projects , 2002, ICIS.

[3]  Wei Gao,et al.  The State and Profile of Open Source Software Projects in health and medical informatics , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  Chih-Ping Wei,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Mobile Commerce Applications , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[5]  H. Murff,et al.  Physician satisfaction with two order entry systems. , 2001, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[6]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Developing an information systems infrastructure with open source software , 2004, IEEE Software.

[7]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Commercial adoption of open source software: an empirical study , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2005..

[8]  Varun Grover,et al.  Open Source: Concepts, Benefits, and Challenges , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Defining Open Source Software Project Success , 2003, ICIS.

[10]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  Open Source software in medical informatics - why, how and what , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation , 2009 .

[12]  The Ninth Annual HIMSS Leadership Survey. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. , 1998, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[13]  Hhs Centers for Medicare Medicare Services Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. , 2010, Federal register.

[14]  Binshan Lin,et al.  Adoption of mobile technology in business: a fit-viability model , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[15]  Carolyn B. Seaman,et al.  An Empirical Investigation into the Adoption of Open Source Software in Hospitals , 2008, Int. J. Heal. Inf. Syst. Informatics.

[16]  Sigi Goode,et al.  Something for nothing: management rejection of open source software in Australia's top firms , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Michael S. Aronoff,et al.  The Elephant and the Blind Men , 1991 .

[18]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Open Source Software the Trenches: Lessons from a Large-Scale OSS Implementation , 2003, ICIS.

[19]  Guy Paré,et al.  Barriers to Open Source Software Adoption in Quebec’s Health Care Organizations , 2009, Journal of Medical Systems.

[20]  Oyvind Hauge,et al.  An empirical study on selection of Open Source Software - Preliminary results , 2009, 2009 ICSE Workshop on Emerging Trends in Free/Libre/Open Source Software Research and Development.

[21]  Margaret Jackson,et al.  Australian Case Studies in Mobile Commerce , 2007, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[22]  Gareth S. Kantor,et al.  Letter to the Editor: Open-source Software and the Primary Care EMR , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[23]  Neil A. Ernst,et al.  Open Source, Open Standards, and Health Care Information Systems , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[25]  Jesper Holck,et al.  Managerial and Technical Barriers to the Adoption of Open Source Software , 2005, ICCBSS.

[26]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[27]  F Lawler,et al.  Implementation and termination of a computerized medical information system. , 1996, The Journal of family practice.

[28]  Michael Hogarth,et al.  A Study of Clinically Related Open Source Software Projects , 2005, AMIA.

[29]  Dimitrios G. Katehakis,et al.  Reflections on the Role of Open Source in Health Information System Interoperability , 2007, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.