Effect of electrostatic, hydrodynamic, and Brownian forces on particle trajectories and sieving in normal flow filtration.

Particle deposition and fouling are critical factors governing the performance of microfiltration and ultrafiltration systems. Particle trajectories were evaluated by numerical integration of the Langevin equation, accounting for the combined effects of electrostatic repulsion, enhanced hydrodynamic drag, and Brownian diffusion. In the absence of Brownian forces, particles are unable to enter the membrane pores unless the drag associated with the filtration velocity can overcome the electrostatic repulsion. Brownian forces significantly alter this behavior, allowing some particles to enter the pore even at low filtration velocities. The average particle transmission, evaluated from the probability of having a particle enter the pore, increases with increasing filtration velocity due to the greater hydrodynamic drag force on the particle. These results provide important insights into particle behavior in membrane systems.

[1]  W. Deen.  Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid‐filled pores , 1987 .

[2]  M. Otaki,et al.  Virus removal in a membrane separation process , 1998 .

[3]  W. Bowen,et al.  Prediction of optimum membrane design: pore entrance shape and surface potential , 2002 .

[4]  Georges Belfort,et al.  Fluid mechanics and cross-flow filtration: some thoughts , 1985 .

[5]  Goodarz Ahmadi,et al.  Dispersion and Deposition of Spherical Particles from Point Sources in a Turbulent Channel Flow , 1992 .

[6]  Chung C. Hsu,et al.  Membrane fouling in sterile filtration of recombinant human growth hormone , 1996, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  R. Field,et al.  Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling , 1995 .

[8]  S. Weinbaum,et al.  Theory and experiment on the three-dimensional motion of a freely suspended spherical particle at the entrance to a pore at low Reynolds number , 1983 .

[9]  R. G. Cox,et al.  Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall , 1967 .

[10]  V. Starov,et al.  A model of the interaction between a charged particle and a pore in a charged membrane surface , 1999 .

[11]  S. Weinbaum,et al.  A theoretical model for nuclepore filters including hydrodynamic and molecular wall interaction effects , 1988 .

[12]  P. Schmitz,et al.  Hydrodynamic aspects of crossflow microfiltration. Analysis of particle deposition at the membrane surface , 1992 .

[13]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration: Principles and Applications , 1996 .

[14]  Georges Belfort,et al.  Lateral migration of spherical particles in porous flow channels: application to membrane filtration , 1984 .

[15]  J. L. Anderson,et al.  Hindered diffusion in slit pores: an analytical result , 1993 .

[16]  Robert Y. Ning,et al.  Discussion of silica speciation, fouling, control and maximum reduction , 2003 .

[17]  R. Iranpour.  Virus removal by advanced membrane filtration for wastewater reclamation , 1998 .

[18]  W. Bowen,et al.  Hydrodynamic and colloidal interactions effects on the rejection of a particle larger than a pore in microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes , 1998 .