Scaling body support in mammals: limb posture and muscle mechanics.

The scaling of bone and muscle geometry in mammals suggests that peak stresses (ratio of force to cross-sectional area) acting in these two support elements increase with increasing body size. Observations of stresses acting in the limb bones of different sized mammals during strenuous activity, however, indicate that peak bone stress is independent of size (maintaining a safety factor of between 2 and 4). It appears that similar peak bone stresses and muscle stresses in large and small mammals are achieved primarily by a size-dependent change in locomotor limb posture: small animals run with crouched postures, whereas larger species run more upright. By adopting an upright posture, large animals align their limbs more closely with the ground reaction force, substantially reducing the forces that their muscles must exert (proportional to body mass) and hence, the forces that their bones must resist, to counteract joint moments. This change in limb posture to maintain locomotor stresses within safe limits, however, likely limits the maneuverability and accelerative capability of large animals.

[1]  T. McMahon,et al.  Size and Shape in Biology , 1973, Science.

[2]  T. McMahon,et al.  Scaling Stride Frequency and Gait to Animal Size: Mice to Horses , 1974, Science.

[3]  T. McMahon Using body size to understand the structural design of animals: quadrupedal locomotion. , 1975, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  N. Heglund SHORT COMMUNICATION A SIMPLE DESIGN FOR A FORCE-PLATE TO MEASURE GROUND REACTION FORCES , 1981 .

[5]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Limb mechanics as a function of speed and gait: a study of functional strains in the radius and tibia of horse and dog. , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  G. Cavagna,et al.  Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. IV. Total mechanical energy changes as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals. , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  A A Biewener,et al.  Bone strength in small mammals and bipedal birds: do safety factors change with body size? , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  A. Biewener,et al.  Bone stress in the horse forelimb during locomotion at different gaits: a comparison of two experimental methods. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  A. C. Economos Elastic and/or geometric similarity in mammalian design? , 1983, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  A. Biewener Locomotory stresses in the limb bones of two small mammals: the ground squirrel and chipmunk. , 1983, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  A. Biewener Allometry of quadrupedal locomotion: the scaling of duty factor, bone curvature and limb orientation to body size. , 1983, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Force development during sustained locomotion: a determinant of gait, speed and metabolic power. , 1985, The Journal of experimental biology.

[13]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Bone strain: a determinant of gait and speed? , 1986, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  N. Heglund,et al.  Speed, stride frequency and energy cost per stride: how do they change with body size and gait? , 1988, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Preferred speeds in terrestrial vertebrates: are they equivalent? , 1988, The Journal of experimental biology.