Understanding the Role of Computer-Supported Argumentation in the Strategic Change Process

In this paper the authors develop a conceptual framework for appreciating the use of computer-supported argumentation systems in organisational settings undergoing strategic change. More specifically, the authors concentrate on the role of computer-supported argumentation as catalyst for compensating distortions in the outcome of change, originating from the organisation’s power regime. The framework developed is based on a view of strategic change as actor-network (re)formation. Argumentation is in the core of this process which is greatly influenced by the power distribution among the participants of the change effort. A dynamic simulation model is used to instantiate the conceptual framework and to capture the dynamics of change. Simulation experiments are conducted to investigate the effects of employing argumentation technologies with specific characteristics related to the representation of power and accessibility in the argumentation discourse on the outcome of change.

[1]  Nandini Rajagopalan,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF STRATEGIC CHANGE: A MULTI-LENS PERSPECTIVE AND INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK , 1997 .

[2]  M. Feldman Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[3]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Technochange management: using IT to drive organizational change , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[4]  William David Salisbury,et al.  Understanding the influence of organizational change strategies on information technology and knowledge management strategies , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  Jose Abdelnour-Nocera Knowledge and Technological Development Effects on Organizational and Social Structures , 2012 .

[6]  Nikos Karacapilidis,et al.  Knowledge management and collaborative model building in the strategy development process , 2005 .

[7]  David Bloor,et al.  Polyhedra and the Abominations of Leviticus , 1978, British Journal for the History of Science.

[8]  R. Whittington Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research , 2006 .

[9]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[10]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[11]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  The Machine at Work , 1997 .

[12]  Steven D. Brown Michel Serres , 2002 .

[13]  Mark J. Zbaracki,et al.  Strategic decision making , 1992 .

[14]  S. Toulmin The uses of argument , 1960 .

[15]  RathnayakeChamil Social Construction of Colombo Lotus Tower , 2015 .

[16]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[17]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[18]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[19]  B. Latour Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[20]  G. Hamel Strategy Innovation and the Quest for Value , 1998 .

[21]  Roderick E. White,et al.  Strategy Process: Forming, Implementing and Changing Strategies , 2006 .

[22]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Negotiating using rewards , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[23]  P. Bourdieu Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[24]  R. Capdevila,et al.  Perpetuum Mobile: Substance, Force and the Sociology of Translation , 1999 .

[25]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[26]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[27]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies , 1996 .

[28]  Aldo de Moor,et al.  Argumentation support , 2006 .

[29]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  Governing Through Technology: Information Artefacts and Social Practice , 2010 .

[30]  Simon Lilley,et al.  Representing Organization: Knowledge, Management, and the Information Age , 2004 .

[31]  Nandini Rajagopalan,et al.  TOWARDS A THEORY OF STRATEGIC CHANGE: A MULTI-LENS PERSPECTIVE AND INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK. , 1996 .

[32]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Organizations and Unusual Routines: A Systems Analysis of Dysfunctional Feedback Processes , 2010 .

[33]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Information, Systems, And Information Systems , 1997 .

[34]  M. Gordon Hunter,et al.  Identifying Issues of the Chief Information Officer Role through Qualitative Interviews , 2011, Int. J. Sociotechnology Knowl. Dev..

[35]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[36]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems , 2005 .

[37]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames , 2007 .

[38]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[39]  Erik R. Larsen,et al.  Representing change: a system model of organizational inertia and capabilities as dynamic accumulation processes , 2002, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[40]  C. Eden,et al.  Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management , 1998 .

[41]  Nikos Karacapilidis,et al.  Supporting Argumentative Collaboration in Communities of Practice: The CoPe_it! Approach , 2009 .

[42]  Badreya Nasser Al-Jenaibi,et al.  The New Electronic Government: Are the Federal Authorities Ready to use E-Government? , 2015, Int. J. Knowl. Soc. Res..

[43]  J. Sillince The Organizational Setting, Use and Institutionalization of Argumentation Repertoires , 1999 .

[44]  Mark Klein,et al.  Mediating debate through on-line large-scale argumentation: Evidence from the field , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[45]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Argumentation Rationality of Management Decisions , 1999 .

[46]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods , 2006 .

[47]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Alternative Approaches for Studying Organizational Change , 2005 .

[48]  Bernard Moulin,et al.  A taxonomy of argumentation models used for knowledge representation , 2010, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[49]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1979 .

[50]  Robert Chia,et al.  On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change , 2002, Organ. Sci..