Integrated Computational Solution for Predicting Skin Sensitization Potential of Molecules

Introduction Skin sensitization forms a major toxicological endpoint for dermatology and cosmetic products. Recent ban on animal testing for cosmetics demands for alternative methods. We developed an integrated computational solution (SkinSense) that offers a robust solution and addresses the limitations of existing computational tools i.e. high false positive rate and/or limited coverage. Results The key components of our solution include: QSAR models selected from a combinatorial set, similarity information and literature-derived sub-structure patterns of known skin protein reactive groups. Its prediction performance on a challenge set of molecules showed accuracy = 75.32%, CCR = 74.36%, sensitivity = 70.00% and specificity = 78.72%, which is better than several existing tools including VEGA (accuracy = 45.00% and CCR = 54.17% with ‘High’ reliability scoring), DEREK (accuracy = 72.73% and CCR = 71.44%) and TOPKAT (accuracy = 60.00% and CCR = 61.67%). Although, TIMES-SS showed higher predictive power (accuracy = 90.00% and CCR = 92.86%), the coverage was very low (only 10 out of 77 molecules were predicted reliably). Conclusions Owing to improved prediction performance and coverage, our solution can serve as a useful expert system towards Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment for skin sensitization. It would be invaluable to cosmetic/ dermatology industry for pre-screening their molecules, and reducing time, cost and animal testing.

[1]  Julius T. Tou,et al.  Pattern Recognition Principles , 1974 .

[2]  D A Basketter,et al.  Multivariate QSAR analysis of a skin sensitization database. , 1994, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[3]  Haifeng Chen,et al.  Comparative Study of QSAR/QSPR Correlations Using Support Vector Machines, Radial Basis Function Neural Networks, and Multiple Linear Regression , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[4]  K Enslein,et al.  A quantitative structure-toxicity relationships model for the dermal sensitization guinea pig maximization assay. , 1997, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[5]  B. Fan,et al.  Classification study of skin sensitizers based on support vector machine and linear discriminant analysis. , 2006, Analytica chimica acta.

[6]  Thomas A. Halgren,et al.  Merck molecular force field. II. MMFF94 van der Waals and electrostatic parameters for intermolecular. interactions , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[7]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  Review of Data Sources, QSARs and Integrated Testing Strategies for Skin Sensitisation , 2008 .

[8]  Prabha Garg,et al.  Role of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) as active efflux transporter on blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability , 2014, Molecular Diversity.

[9]  Chris Morley,et al.  Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox , 2011, J. Cheminformatics.

[10]  Hiroshi Itagaki,et al.  The in vitro skin sensitization test; human cell line activation test (h-CLAT) using THP-1 cells , 2007 .

[11]  Jean-Louis Reymond,et al.  Visualisation and subsets of the chemical universe database GDB-13 for virtual screening , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[12]  I Gerner,et al.  Chemical substances and contact allergy--244 substances ranked according to allergenic potency. , 2003, Toxicology.

[13]  Petra S Kern,et al.  TIMES-SS--a mechanistic evaluation of an external validation study using reaction chemistry principles. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.

[14]  Hitoshi Sakaguchi,et al.  Data integration of non-animal tests for the development of a test battery to predict the skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals. , 2013, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[15]  David W. Roberts,et al.  A Minireview of Available Skin Sensitization (Q)SARs/Expert Systems , 2008 .

[16]  Janine Ezendam,et al.  Gene expression changes induced by skin sensitizers in the KeratinoSens™ cell line: Discriminating Nrf2-dependent and Nrf2-independent events. , 2013, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[17]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Quantitative structure‐activity relationships for predicting skin and respiratory sensitization , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[18]  Kristina Luthman,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis--formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[19]  S. Enoch,et al.  Identification of mechanisms of toxic action for skin sensitisation using a SMARTS pattern based approach , 2008, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[20]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  Performance of a novel keratinocyte-based reporter cell line to screen skin sensitizers in vitro. , 2010, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[21]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[22]  J C Madden,et al.  Integrating (Q)SAR models, expert systems and read-across approaches for the prediction of developmental toxicity. , 2010, Reproductive toxicology.

[23]  Janine Ezendam,et al.  Anchoring molecular mechanisms to the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization: Analysis of existing data , 2014, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[24]  Judith C. Madden,et al.  Formation of Structural Categories to Allow for Read‐Across for Teratogenicity , 2009 .

[25]  David W Roberts,et al.  Mechanistic applicability domains for nonanimal-based prediction of toxicological end points: general principles and application to reactive toxicity. , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.

[26]  J. Hettick,et al.  Haptenation: Chemical Reactivity and Protein Binding , 2011, Journal of allergy.

[27]  Martine Ruet Rossignol The 7th Amendment to the Cosmetics Directive. , 2005, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[28]  Marco Pintore,et al.  Global QSAR models of skin sensitisers for regulatory purposes , 2010, Chemistry Central journal.

[29]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Compilation of Historical Local Lymph Node Data for Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternative Methods , 2005, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[30]  CHUN WEI YAP,et al.  PaDEL‐descriptor: An open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[31]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Electrophilic chemistry related to skin sensitization. Reaction mechanistic applicability domain classification for a published data set of 106 chemicals tested in the mouse local lymph node assay. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.

[32]  Chanita Kuseva,et al.  Towards AOP application--implementation of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) into a pipeline tool for skin sensitization. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[33]  Chris Morley,et al.  Pybel: a Python wrapper for the OpenBabel cheminformatics toolkit , 2008, Chemistry Central journal.

[34]  Aynur Aptula,et al.  Local Lymph Node Data for the Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternatives: A Second Compilation , 2010, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[35]  Nathalie Alépée,et al.  The Myeloid U937 Skin Sensitization Test (U-SENS) addresses the activation of dendritic cell event in the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization. , 2015, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[36]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[37]  G Patlewicz,et al.  An evaluation of selected global (Q)SARs/expert systems for the prediction of skin sensitisation potential , 2007, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[38]  I Kimber,et al.  Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment. , 2001, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[39]  Petra Kern,et al.  A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation , 2013, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[40]  Alexander Tropsha,et al.  Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part I: QSAR models of skin sensitization and their application to identify potentially hazardous compounds. , 2015, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[41]  Philip S. Magee Exploring the Potential for Allergic Contact Dermatitisvia Computed Heats of Reaction of Haptens with Protein End-groups Heats of Reaction of Haptens with Protein End-groups by Computation , 2000 .

[42]  Stephen R. Heller,et al.  InChI - the worldwide chemical structure identifier standard , 2013, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[43]  Nigel Greene,et al.  Computer systems for the prediction of toxicity: an update. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[44]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  Filling the concept with data: integrating data from different in vitro and in silico assays on skin sensitizers to explore the battery approach for animal-free skin sensitization testing. , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[45]  Pablo Moscato,et al.  Identification of a 5-Protein Biomarker Molecular Signature for Predicting Alzheimer's Disease , 2008, PloS one.

[46]  Gavin Maxwell,et al.  From pathways to people: applying the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) for skin sensitization to risk assessment. , 2013, ALTEX.

[47]  C. Nantasenamat,et al.  QSAR modeling of aromatase inhibition by flavonoids using machine learning approaches , 2014, Chemical Papers.

[48]  Tomasz Arodz,et al.  Computational methods in developing quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR): a review. , 2006, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[49]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Hapten–protein binding: from theory to practical application in the in vitro prediction of skin sensitization , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[50]  Alexander Tropsha,et al.  Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation , 2010, Molecular informatics.

[51]  S. Anderson,et al.  The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations , 2011, Journal of allergy.

[52]  Jonathan D. Hirst,et al.  Contemporary QSAR Classifiers Compared , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[53]  Malin Lindstedt,et al.  A genomic biomarker signature can predict skin sensitizers using a cell-based in vitro alternative to animal tests , 2011, BMC Genomics.

[54]  Deepak Singla,et al.  A web server for predicting inhibitors against bacterial target GlmU protein , 2011, BMC pharmacology.

[55]  Andrew Worth,et al.  Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance. , 2013, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[56]  Thomas A. Halgren Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94 , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[57]  Harshinder Singh,et al.  Application of the Random Forest Method in Studies of Local Lymph Node Assay Based Skin Sensitization Data , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[58]  Ivan Rusyn,et al.  Predicting drug-induced hepatotoxicity using QSAR and toxicogenomics approaches. , 2011, Chemical research in toxicology.

[59]  J. Nicolas,et al.  Effector and regulatory mechanisms in allergic contact dermatitis , 2009, Allergy.

[60]  Marvin Johnson,et al.  Concepts and applications of molecular similarity , 1990 .