Carbon allowance auction design of China's emissions trading scheme: A multi-agent-based approach

In this paper, a multi-agent-based ETS simulation model is proposed for carbon allowance auction design in China. In the proposed model, two main agents, i.e., the government (the ETS implementer) and the firms in different sectors (the ETS targets), are considered. Under the ETS policy, all agents make various decisions individually according to their own goals, and interact with each other through three main markets: the commodity market, the primary carbon auction market and the secondary carbon trading market. Different popular auction designs are introduced into the ETS formulation to offer helpful insights into China's ETS design. (1) Generally, the ETS would lead to positive effects on China's carbon mitigation and energy structure improvement, but a negative impact on economy. (2) As for auction forms, the uniform-price design is relatively moderate, while the discriminative-price design is quite aggressive in both economic damage and emissions reduction. (3) As for carbon price, the uniform-price auction might generate a slightly higher market clearing price than the discriminative-price auction, and the prices under two auction rules fluctuate about RMB 40 per metric ton. (4) As for carbon cap, the total allowances in the carbon auction market should be carefully set to well balance economic growth and mitigation effect.

[1]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry , 2008 .

[2]  Yue-Jun Zhang,et al.  Regional allocation of carbon emission quotas in China: Evidence from the Shapley value method , 2014 .

[3]  Zhen Liu,et al.  Multi-agent based experimental analysis on bidding mechanism in electricity auction markets , 2012 .

[4]  Leigh Tesfatsion,et al.  Market power and efficiency in a computational electricity market with discriminatory double-auction pricing , 2001, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[5]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Experimental comparison of impact of auction format on carbon allowance market , 2012 .

[6]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF AUCTIONS VERSUS GRANDFATHERING TO ASSIGN POLLUTION PERMITS , 2010 .

[7]  J. Goeree,et al.  Demand reduction and preemptive bidding in multi-unit license auctions , 2005, Experimental Economics.

[8]  A. Anger,et al.  Including aviation in the European emissions trading scheme: Impacts on the industry, CO2 emissions and macroeconomic activity in the EU , 2010 .

[9]  Ling Tang,et al.  Designing an emissions trading scheme for China with a dynamic computable general equilibrium model , 2016 .

[10]  John Hutton,et al.  Allocation of carbon permits within a country: a general equilibrium analysis of the United Kingdom , 2001 .

[11]  Endogenous Market Power in an Emissions Trading Scheme with Auctioning , 2014 .

[12]  Bin Ye,et al.  The allowance mechanism of China’s carbon trading pilots: A comparative analysis with schemes in EU and California , 2017 .

[13]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Auction design for the allocation of carbon emission allowances: uniform or discriminatory price? , 2010 .

[14]  Yue-Jun Zhang,et al.  The impact of China's carbon allowance allocation rules on the product prices and emission reduction behaviors of ETS-covered enterprises , 2015 .

[15]  Juan Carlos Ciscar,et al.  CO2 emission trading within the European Union and Annex B countries: the cement industry case , 2006 .

[16]  Kenji Matsui,et al.  Cost-based transfer pricing under R&D risk aversion in an integrated supply chain , 2012 .

[17]  B. LeBaron Agent-based Computational Finance , 2006 .

[18]  Noah Dormady,et al.  Carbon auctions, energy markets & market power: An experimental analysis , 2014 .

[19]  Yue-Jun Zhang,et al.  Carbon emission quota allocation among China’s industrial sectors based on the equity and efficiency principles , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[20]  D. N. Dewees,et al.  Pollution and the Price of Power , 2008 .

[21]  Lean Yu,et al.  Carbon emissions trading scheme exploration in China: A multi-agent-based model , 2015 .

[22]  Lei Zhu,et al.  How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020 carbon intensity reduction target? , 2014 .

[23]  Junli Zhang,et al.  An equivalent marginal cost-pricing model for the district heating market , 2013 .

[24]  The choice of multiple or single auctions in emissions trading , 2005 .

[25]  A. Roth,et al.  Predicting How People Play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibria , 1998 .

[26]  Peter Cramton,et al.  Tradeable Carbon Permit Auctions: How and Why to Auction Not Grandfather , 2002 .

[27]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  Collusion in Auctions for Emission Permits: An Experimental Analysis , 2008 .

[28]  Christian Egenhofer,et al.  The Making of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme:: Status, Prospects and Implications for Business , 2007 .

[29]  P. Klemperer What Really Matters in Auction Design , 2001 .

[30]  Eugeniusz Mokrzycki,et al.  CO2 emissions from Polish cement industry , 2010 .

[31]  Ranjit Bharvirkar,et al.  The Effect of Allowance Allocation on the Cost of Carbon Emission Trading , 2001 .

[32]  Cal B. Muckley,et al.  An Emerging Equilibrium in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme , 2010 .

[33]  Han Qiao,et al.  Impacts of Border Carbon Adjustments on China's Sectoral Emissions: Simulations with a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Model , 2012 .

[34]  D. Scott,et al.  Aviation's inclusion in international climate policy regimes: Implications for the Caribbean tourism industry , 2011 .